NVIDIA
GeForce RTX 5080 vs Radeon HD 8690M
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
AMD
Radeon HD 8690M
Aggregate performance score
We've compared RTX 5080 and Radeon HD 8690M across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗RTX 5080 outperforms Radeon HD 8690M by ~162% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+162%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: GeForce RTX 5080 (~103%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider RTX 5080
- Higher catalog performance index
- More graphics memory
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 12.0 · DLSS 4
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 8690M
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 1.2 · Not supported
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIA
AMDPerformance
Price / performance
Memory capacity
7629
5464
8856
Graphics card ranking
Positions 28–33of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon HD 8690M
170 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
76Better
29
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
61Better
27
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
59Better
25
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
63Better
26
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
67Better
33
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
HDMI
DisplayPort
Device class
Upscaling
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumption—
Memory type
Power connector
Release date
Architecture
Thickness
Compute API
Launch price—
Shader units / coresBetter
Length
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAMBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory busBetter
Memory bandwidthBetter
Interface
Power consumption—
Process nodeBetter
Recommended PSU
Die sizeBetter
Memory cache
Transistor countBetter
Max monitors
Max resolution
USB Type-C
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares RTX 5080 and Radeon HD 8690M across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
RTX 5080Radeon HD 8690M
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
316 FPS
148 FPS
1080p Ultra
222 FPS
104 FPS
1440p Ultra
173 FPS
56 FPS
4K Ultra
86 FPS
20 FPS
Counter-Strike 2RTX 5080316 FPSRadeon HD 8690M148 FPSRTX 5080222 FPSRadeon HD 8690M104 FPSRTX 5080173 FPSRadeon HD 8690M56 FPSRTX 508086 FPSRadeon HD 8690M20 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077RTX 5080204 FPSRadeon HD 8690M96 FPSRTX 5080176 FPSRadeon HD 8690M82 FPSRTX 5080125 FPSRadeon HD 8690M40 FPSRTX 508058 FPSRadeon HD 8690M13 FPS
Forza Horizon 5RTX 5080234 FPSRadeon HD 8690M121 FPSRTX 5080167 FPSRadeon HD 8690M78 FPSRTX 5080155 FPSRadeon HD 8690M50 FPSRTX 5080126 FPSRadeon HD 8690M30 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyRTX 5080167 FPSRadeon HD 8690M78 FPSRTX 5080139 FPSRadeon HD 8690M65 FPSRTX 5080112 FPSRadeon HD 8690M36 FPSRTX 508059 FPSRadeon HD 8690M14 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100762990%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100793480%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100793675%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100885644%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 100630200%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100814166%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100814068%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100793675%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100834461%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100803774%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12.211.1
Vulkan1.41.2
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingDLSS 4Not supported
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 12.0OpenCL 1.2
Architecture and release
ArchitectureBlackwell 2.0GCN / TeraScale
Process node4 nmBetter28 nm
Release date20252013
Device classDesktopMobile
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count45600 millionBetter690 million
Die size378 mm²56 mm²Better
Shader units / cores10752Better320
Base clock2295 MHzBetter925 MHz
Boost clock2617 MHzBetter975 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 5x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length304 mmOEM dependent
ThicknessDual-slotOEM dependent
Recommended PSU750 WOEM dependent
Power connector16 pinIntegrated laptop power
Display outputs and limits
HDMIHDMI 2.1bOEM dependent
DisplayPortDisplayPort 2.1bOEM dependent
USB Type-CNoOEM dependent
Max monitors4OEM dependent
Max resolution7680 × 4320OEM dependent
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM16 GB GDDR7Better2 GB GDDR5
Memory typeGDDR7GDDR5 / DDR3
Memory bus256 bitBetter64 bit
TFLOPS56.28Better0.624
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 67
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (4)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (2)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: RTX 5080 or Radeon HD 8690M?+
RTX 5080 has the higher overall gaming score, while Radeon HD 8690M offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
RTX 5080 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
RTX 5080 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
RTX 5080 offers more overall performance, while RTX 5080 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RTX 5080 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Radeon HD 8690M is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
RTX 5080 leads in combined 1440p performance. RTX 5080 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RTX 5080 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
RTX 5080 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
RTX 5080 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to RTX 5080 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.