NVIDIA
GeForce RTX 5080 vs Radeon R7 M250
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
AMD
Radeon R7 M250
Aggregate performance score
We've compared RTX 5080 and Radeon R7 M250 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗RTX 5080 outperforms Radeon R7 M250 by ~145% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+145%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 15, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: GeForce RTX 5080 (~56%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider RTX 5080
- Higher catalog performance index
- More graphics memory
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 12.0 · DLSS 4
Reasons to consider Radeon R7 M250
- Lower stated power consumption
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 1.2 · Not supported
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIA
AMDPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
7631
63100
5454
8856
Graphics card ranking
Positions 28–33of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce RTX 5080
154 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
76Better
31
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
61Better
29
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
59Better
26
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
63
100Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
67Better
43
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
HDMI
DisplayPort
Device class
Upscaling
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Memory type
Power connector
Release date
Architecture
Thickness
Compute API
Launch price—
Shader units / coresBetter
Length
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAMBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory busBetter
Memory bandwidthBetter
Interface
Power consumptionBetter
Process nodeBetter
Recommended PSUBetter
Die sizeBetter
Memory cache
Transistor countBetter
Max monitors
Max resolution
USB Type-C
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares RTX 5080 and Radeon R7 M250 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
RTX 5080Radeon R7 M250
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
316 FPS
157 FPS
1080p Ultra
222 FPS
108 FPS
1440p Ultra
173 FPS
60 FPS
4K Ultra
86 FPS
21 FPS
Counter-Strike 2RTX 5080316 FPSRadeon R7 M250157 FPSRTX 5080222 FPSRadeon R7 M250108 FPSRTX 5080173 FPSRadeon R7 M25060 FPSRTX 508086 FPSRadeon R7 M25021 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077RTX 5080204 FPSRadeon R7 M250101 FPSRTX 5080176 FPSRadeon R7 M25086 FPSRTX 5080125 FPSRadeon R7 M25043 FPSRTX 508058 FPSRadeon R7 M25014 FPS
Forza Horizon 5RTX 5080234 FPSRadeon R7 M250127 FPSRTX 5080167 FPSRadeon R7 M25081 FPSRTX 5080155 FPSRadeon R7 M25054 FPSRTX 5080126 FPSRadeon R7 M25031 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyRTX 5080167 FPSRadeon R7 M25083 FPSRTX 5080139 FPSRadeon R7 M25068 FPSRTX 5080112 FPSRadeon R7 M25039 FPSRTX 508059 FPSRadeon R7 M25014 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100763184%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100793577%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100793870%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100885644%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1006310045%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100814263%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100814166%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100793870%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100834559%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100803871%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12.211.1
Vulkan1.41.2
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingDLSS 4Not supported
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 12.0OpenCL 1.2
Architecture and release
ArchitectureBlackwell 2.0GCN
Process node4 nmBetter28 nm
Release date20252013
Device classDesktopMobile
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count45600 millionBetter950 million
Die size378 mm²77 mm²Better
Shader units / cores10752Better384
Base clock2295 MHzBetter1000 MHz
Boost clock2617 MHzBetter1050 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 5x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length304 mmOEM dependent
ThicknessDual-slotDual-slot
Recommended PSU750 W250 WBetter
Power connector16 pinNone
Display outputs and limits
HDMIHDMI 2.1bHDMI 1.4a
DisplayPortDisplayPort 2.1bOEM dependent
USB Type-CNoOEM dependent
Max monitors4OEM dependent
Max resolution7680 × 4320OEM dependent
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM16 GB GDDR7Better1 GB GDDR5
Memory typeGDDR7GDDR5 / DDR3
Memory bus256 bitBetter128 bit
TFLOPS56.28Better0.806
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 69
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (4)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (4)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: RTX 5080 or Radeon R7 M250?+
RTX 5080 has the higher overall gaming score, while RTX 5080 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
RTX 5080 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
RTX 5080 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
RTX 5080 offers more overall performance, while RTX 5080 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RTX 5080 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
RTX 5080 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
RTX 5080 leads in combined 1440p performance. RTX 5080 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RTX 5080 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Radeon R7 M250 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Radeon R7 M250 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to RTX 5080 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.