NVIDIA
GeForce RTX 5090 vs GeForce GTX 295
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
NVIDIA
GTX 295
Aggregate performance score
We've compared RTX 5090 and GTX 295 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗RTX 5090 outperforms GTX 295 by ~223% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+223%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: GeForce RTX 5090 (~172%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider RTX 5090
- Higher catalog performance index
- More graphics memory
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 12.0 · DLSS 4
Reasons to consider GTX 295
- Lower stated power consumption
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.3 · Not supported
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIAPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
10031
5836
3852
10043
Graphics card ranking
Positions 1–6of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce RTX 5090
156 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
GeForce GTX 295
Price $248.00Based on catalog performance per unit of current market price, not measured FPS.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
100Better
31
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
78Better
29
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
76Better
26
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
58Better
36
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
79Better
29
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
HDMI
Device class
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
Upscaling
Compute API
DisplayPort
Release date
Launch price—
Architecture
Recommended PSUBetter
LengthBetter
Thickness
Max monitors
Max resolution
Transistor countBetter
Die sizeBetter
Shader units / coresBetter
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Memory type
Power connector
Base clockBetter
Clock speedBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAMBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory busBetter
Memory bandwidthBetter
Interface
Power consumptionBetter
Process nodeBetter
USB Type-C
Memory cacheBetter
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares RTX 5090 and GTX 295 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
RTX 5090GTX 295
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
416 FPS
152 FPS
1080p Ultra
288 FPS
107 FPS
1440p Ultra
215 FPS
60 FPS
4K Ultra
109 FPS
23 FPS
Counter-Strike 2RTX 5090416 FPSGTX 295152 FPSRTX 5090288 FPSGTX 295107 FPSRTX 5090215 FPSGTX 29560 FPSRTX 5090109 FPSGTX 29523 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077RTX 5090262 FPSGTX 29598 FPSRTX 5090234 FPSGTX 29584 FPSRTX 5090162 FPSGTX 29543 FPSRTX 509078 FPSGTX 29515 FPS
Forza Horizon 5RTX 5090324 FPSGTX 295124 FPSRTX 5090221 FPSGTX 29580 FPSRTX 5090196 FPSGTX 29554 FPSRTX 5090150 FPSGTX 29533 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyRTX 5090214 FPSGTX 29580 FPSRTX 5090179 FPSGTX 29567 FPSRTX 5090143 FPSGTX 29539 FPSRTX 509084 FPSGTX 29515 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10010031105%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 1009731103%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 1001003499%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 1001004380%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 100583647%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 1001003694%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 1001003694%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 1001003499%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 1001003890%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 1001003596%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12.210.0
Vulkan1.4Not supported
OpenGL4.63.3
UpscalingDLSS 4Not supported
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 12.0OpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.3
Architecture and release
ArchitectureBlackwell 2.0Tesla 2.0
Process node4 nmBetter55 nm
Release date20252009
Device classDesktopDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count92.2 billionBetter1400 million
Die size750 mm²470 mm²Better
Shader units / cores21760Better240
Base clock2017 MHzBetter576 MHz
Boost clock2407 MHzBetter576 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 5x16PCIe 2x16
Length304 mm267 mmBetter
ThicknessDual-slotDual-slot
Recommended PSU950 W600 WBetter
Power connector16 pin6+8 pin
Display outputs and limits
HDMIHDMI 2.1bHDMI
DisplayPortDisplayPort 2.1bBoard dependent
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitors43
Max resolution7680 × 43202560 × 1600
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM32 GB GDDR7Better1,75 GB GDDR3
Memory typeGDDR7GDDR3
Memory bus512 bitBetter448x2 bit
TFLOPS104.8Better0.596
Other comparisons
RX 9070 GRE 16GBAMD
Arc B580IntelReviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 69
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (5)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (4)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record changed: product_prices
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: RTX 5090 or GTX 295?+
RTX 5090 has the higher overall gaming score, while GTX 295 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
RTX 5090 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
RTX 5090 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
RTX 5090 offers more overall performance, while RTX 5090 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RTX 5090 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
GTX 295 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
RTX 5090 leads in combined 1440p performance. RTX 5090 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RTX 5090 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
GTX 295 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
GTX 295 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to RTX 5090 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.