NVIDIA
GeForce RTX 5090D V2 vs GeForce MX230
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
NVIDIA
GeForce MX230
Aggregate performance score
We've compared RTX 5090D V2 and GeForce MX230 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗RTX 5090D V2 outperforms GeForce MX230 by ~223% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+223%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: GeForce RTX 5090D V2 (~91%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider RTX 5090D V2
- Higher catalog performance index
- More graphics memory
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 12.0 · DLSS 4
Reasons to consider GeForce MX230
- Lower stated power consumption
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 6.1 · NVIDIA Image Scaling (NIS)
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
Performance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
10031
58100
5054
10056
Graphics card ranking
Positions 1–6of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce RTX 5090D V2
141 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
100Better
31
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
78Better
29
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
76Better
26
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
58
100Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
82Better
43
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
HDMI
DisplayPort
Device class
Upscaling
USB Type-C
Power consumptionBetter
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
TFLOPSBetter
Memory type
Power connector
Release date
Architecture
Thickness
Compute API
Launch price—
Shader units / coresBetter
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAMBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory busBetter
Memory bandwidthBetter
Interface
Power consumptionBetter
Process nodeBetter
Recommended PSU
Length
Die sizeBetter
Memory cache
Transistor countBetter
Max monitors
Max resolution
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares RTX 5090D V2 and GeForce MX230 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
RTX 5090D V2GeForce MX230
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
415 FPS
156 FPS
1080p Ultra
287 FPS
110 FPS
1440p Ultra
215 FPS
59 FPS
4K Ultra
109 FPS
21 FPS
Counter-Strike 2RTX 5090D V2415 FPSGeForce MX230156 FPSRTX 5090D V2287 FPSGeForce MX230110 FPSRTX 5090D V2215 FPSGeForce MX23059 FPSRTX 5090D V2109 FPSGeForce MX23021 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077RTX 5090D V2262 FPSGeForce MX230101 FPSRTX 5090D V2234 FPSGeForce MX23087 FPSRTX 5090D V2162 FPSGeForce MX23043 FPSRTX 5090D V278 FPSGeForce MX23014 FPS
Forza Horizon 5RTX 5090D V2323 FPSGeForce MX230127 FPSRTX 5090D V2221 FPSGeForce MX23082 FPSRTX 5090D V2195 FPSGeForce MX23053 FPSRTX 5090D V2149 FPSGeForce MX23031 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyRTX 5090D V2213 FPSGeForce MX23082 FPSRTX 5090D V2179 FPSGeForce MX23069 FPSRTX 5090D V2143 FPSGeForce MX23038 FPSRTX 5090D V284 FPSGeForce MX23014 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10010031105%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100973887%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 1001003890%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 1001005656%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1005810053%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 1001004282%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 1001004184%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 1001003890%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 1001004576%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 1001003890%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12.212.1
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingDLSS 4NVIDIA Image Scaling (NIS)
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 12.0OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 6.1
Architecture and release
ArchitectureBlackwell 2.0Pascal / Turing / Ampere
Process node4 nmBetter14 nm
Release date20252019
Device classDesktopMobile
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count92200 millionBetter1800 million
Die size750 mm²74 mm²Better
Shader units / cores21760Better256
Base clock2017 MHzBetter1519 MHz
Boost clock2407 MHzBetter1531 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 5x16PCIe 3.0 x4
Length304 mmOEM dependent
ThicknessDual-slotIGP
Recommended PSU950 WOEM dependent
Power connector16 pinNone
Display outputs and limits
HDMIHDMI 2.1bOEM dependent
DisplayPortDisplayPort 2.1bOEM dependent
USB Type-CNoOEM dependent
Max monitors4OEM dependent
Max resolution7680 × 4320Depends on host system
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM24 GB GDDR7Better2 GB GDDR5
Memory typeGDDR7GDDR5 / GDDR6
Memory bus384 bitBetter64 bit
TFLOPS104.8Better0.784
Other comparisons
RTX 5090DNVIDIAVSRTX 5090D V2NVIDIAOpen comparisonRTX 5090D V2NVIDIAVSRTX 5090NVIDIAOpen comparisonRTX 5090D V2NVIDIAVS
RX 9070 GRE 16GBAMDOpen comparisonRTX 5090D V2NVIDIAVS
Arc B580IntelOpen comparisonRTX 5090D V2NVIDIAVSRTX 4090NVIDIAOpen comparisonRTX 5090D V2NVIDIAVSRX 9070 XT 16 GBAMDOpen comparisonReviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 69
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (3)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (2)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: RTX 5090D V2 or GeForce MX230?+
RTX 5090D V2 has the higher overall gaming score, while GeForce MX230 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
RTX 5090D V2 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
RTX 5090D V2 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
RTX 5090D V2 offers more overall performance, while RTX 5090D V2 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RTX 5090D V2 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
GeForce MX230 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
RTX 5090D V2 leads in combined 1440p performance. RTX 5090D V2 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RTX 5090D V2 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
GeForce MX230 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
GeForce MX230 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to RTX 5090D V2 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.