AMD
Radeon RX 460 1024SP vs Radeon RX 6500 XT
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
AMD
RX 6500 XT
Aggregate performance score
We've compared RX 460 1024SP and RX 6500 XT across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗RX 6500 XT outperforms RX 460 1024SP by ~9% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+9%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: Radeon RX 460 1024SP (~2%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider RX 460 1024SP
- Lower stated power consumption
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 2.1 · Not supported
Reasons to consider RX 6500 XT
- Higher catalog performance index
- More graphics memory
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 2.2 · FSR
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMDPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
3235
100100
10084
5660
Graphics card ranking
Positions 114–119of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon RX 460 1024SP
178 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
32
35Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
29
32Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
27
29Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100
100
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
52Better
51
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
DisplayPort
HDMI
Device class
USB Type-C
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Thickness
Memory type
Power connector
Release date
ArchitectureBetter
Compute API
Launch priceBetter
Shader units / cores
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAM
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory busBetter
Memory bandwidthBetter
Interface
Power consumptionBetter
Process nodeBetter
Recommended PSUBetter
Length
Die sizeBetter
Memory cache
Transistor countBetter
Max monitors
Max resolution
Upscaling
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares RX 460 1024SP and RX 6500 XT across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
RX 460 1024SPRX 6500 XT
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
165 FPS
178 FPS
1080p Ultra
114 FPS
122 FPS
1440p Ultra
63 FPS
66 FPS
4K Ultra
22 FPS
24 FPS
Counter-Strike 2RX 460 1024SP165 FPSRX 6500 XT178 FPSRX 460 1024SP114 FPSRX 6500 XT122 FPSRX 460 1024SP63 FPSRX 6500 XT66 FPSRX 460 1024SP22 FPSRX 6500 XT24 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077RX 460 1024SP106 FPSRX 6500 XT115 FPSRX 460 1024SP90 FPSRX 6500 XT97 FPSRX 460 1024SP46 FPSRX 6500 XT48 FPSRX 460 1024SP15 FPSRX 6500 XT16 FPS
Forza Horizon 5RX 460 1024SP134 FPSRX 6500 XT145 FPSRX 460 1024SP85 FPSRX 6500 XT92 FPSRX 460 1024SP57 FPSRX 6500 XT59 FPSRX 460 1024SP32 FPSRX 6500 XT35 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyRX 460 1024SP87 FPSRX 6500 XT94 FPSRX 460 1024SP71 FPSRX 6500 XT77 FPSRX 460 1024SP41 FPSRX 6500 XT43 FPSRX 460 1024SP15 FPSRX 6500 XT16 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10032359%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100374826%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10039427%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 10056607%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001001000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10043467%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10041459%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10039427%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 10045499%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100394310%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12.012.2
Vulkan1.31.4
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingNot supportedFSR
Compute APIOpenCL 2.1OpenCL 2.2
Architecture and release
ArchitectureGCN 4.0BetterRDNA 2.0
Process node14 nm6 nmBetter
Release date20172022
Device classDesktopDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count3000 million5400 millionBetter
Die size123 mm²107 mm²Better
Shader units / cores10241024
Base clock1090 MHz2310 MHzBetter
Boost clock1200 MHz2815 MHzBetter
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 3x8PCIe 4x4
Length170 mmVaries by board
ThicknessDual-slotDual-slot
Recommended PSU250 WBetter300 W
Power connector6 pin6 pin
Display outputs and limits
HDMIHDMI 2.0bHDMI 2.1
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4aDisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitors32
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM4 GB GDDR54 GB GDDR6
Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Memory bus128 bitBetter64 bit
TFLOPS2.4585.765Better
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 70
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (4)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (5)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record changed: product_prices
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: RX 460 1024SP or RX 6500 XT?+
RX 460 1024SP has the higher overall gaming score, while RX 460 1024SP offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
RX 460 1024SP is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
RX 460 1024SP is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
RX 460 1024SP offers more overall performance, while RX 460 1024SP offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RX 460 1024SP is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
RX 460 1024SP is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
RX 460 1024SP leads in combined 1440p performance. RX 460 1024SP can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RX 460 1024SP is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
RX 460 1024SP is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
RX 460 1024SP is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to RX 460 1024SP if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.