AMD
Radeon RX 460 vs GeForce MX350
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
NVIDIA
GeForce MX350
Aggregate performance score
We've compared RX 460 and GeForce MX350 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗RX 460 outperforms GeForce MX350 by ~3% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+3%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: Radeon RX 460 (~21%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider RX 460
- Higher catalog performance index
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 2.1 · Not supported
Reasons to consider GeForce MX350
- Lower stated power consumption
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 6.1 · NVIDIA Image Scaling (NIS)
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMD
NVIDIAPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
3231
100100
10054
5656
Graphics card ranking
Positions 158–163of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce MX350
165 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
32Better
31
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
29
29
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
27Better
26
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100
100
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
52Better
43
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Process node
DisplayPort
HDMI
Device class
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Memory type
Power connector
Release date
Architecture
Thickness
Compute API
Launch price—
Shader units / coresBetter
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAM
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory busBetter
Memory bandwidthBetter
Interface
Power consumptionBetter
Recommended PSU
Length
Die sizeBetter
Memory cache
Transistor countBetter
Max monitors
Max resolution
USB Type-C
Upscaling
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares RX 460 and GeForce MX350 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
RX 460GeForce MX350
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
164 FPS
155 FPS
1080p Ultra
113 FPS
109 FPS
1440p Ultra
62 FPS
58 FPS
4K Ultra
22 FPS
21 FPS
Counter-Strike 2RX 460164 FPSGeForce MX350155 FPSRX 460113 FPSGeForce MX350109 FPSRX 46062 FPSGeForce MX35058 FPSRX 46022 FPSGeForce MX35021 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077RX 460106 FPSGeForce MX350100 FPSRX 46090 FPSGeForce MX35086 FPSRX 46045 FPSGeForce MX35042 FPSRX 46015 FPSGeForce MX35014 FPS
Forza Horizon 5RX 460133 FPSGeForce MX350126 FPSRX 46085 FPSGeForce MX35082 FPSRX 46056 FPSGeForce MX35052 FPSRX 46032 FPSGeForce MX35031 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyRX 46086 FPSGeForce MX35082 FPSRX 46071 FPSGeForce MX35068 FPSRX 46041 FPSGeForce MX35038 FPSRX 46015 FPSGeForce MX35014 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10032313%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10037356%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10039383%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 10056560%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001001000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10043422%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10041410%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10039383%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 10045450%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10039383%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12.012.1
Vulkan1.31.4
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingNot supportedNVIDIA Image Scaling (NIS)
Compute APIOpenCL 2.1OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 6.1
Architecture and release
ArchitectureGCN 4.0Pascal / Turing / Ampere
Process node14 nm14 nm
Release date20162020
Device classDesktopMobile
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count3000 million3300 millionBetter
Die size123 mm²Better132 mm²
Shader units / cores896Better640
Base clock1090 MHzBetter747 MHz
Boost clock1200 MHzBetter937 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 3x8PCIe 3.0 x4
Length170 mmOEM dependent
ThicknessDual-slotOEM dependent
Recommended PSU250 WOEM dependent
Power connectorNoneNone
Display outputs and limits
HDMIHDMI 2.0bOEM dependent
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4aOEM dependent
USB Type-CNoOEM dependent
Max monitors3OEM dependent
Max resolution7680 × 4320OEM dependent
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM2 GB GDDR52 GB GDDR5
Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5 / GDDR6
Memory bus128 bitBetter64 bit
TFLOPS2.15Better1.199
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 69
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (4)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (3)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: RX 460 or GeForce MX350?+
RX 460 has the higher overall gaming score, while RX 460 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
GeForce MX350 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
GeForce MX350 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
RX 460 offers more overall performance, while RX 460 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
GeForce MX350 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
RX 460 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
RX 460 leads in combined 1440p performance. RX 460 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RX 460 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
GeForce MX350 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
GeForce MX350 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to RX 460 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.