AMD
Radeon RX 460 vs Mobility Radeon 9700
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
ATI
Mobility Radeon 9700
Aggregate performance score
We've compared RX 460 and Mobility Radeon 9700 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗RX 460 outperforms Mobility Radeon 9700 by ~10% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+10%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: Radeon RX 460 (~58%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider RX 460
- Higher catalog performance index
- More graphics memory
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 2.1 · Not supported
Reasons to consider Mobility Radeon 9700
- Recorded feature support: Not supported · Not supported
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMDPerformance
Price / performance
Memory capacity
3229
10064
562
Graphics card ranking
Positions 158–163of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon RX 460
120 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
32Better
29
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
29Better
27
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
27Better
25
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
26
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
52Better
33
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Process nodeBetter
DisplayPort
HDMI
Device class
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
TFLOPS
Power consumption—
Memory type
Power connector
Release date
ArchitectureBetter
Thickness
Compute API
Launch price—
Shader units / cores
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAMBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory bus
Memory bandwidthBetter
Interface
Power consumption—
Recommended PSU
Length
Die sizeBetter
Memory cache
Transistor countBetter
Max monitors
Max resolution
USB Type-C
Upscaling
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares RX 460 and Mobility Radeon 9700 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
RX 460Mobility Radeon 9700
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
164 FPS
144 FPS
1080p Ultra
113 FPS
101 FPS
1440p Ultra
62 FPS
54 FPS
4K Ultra
22 FPS
20 FPS
Counter-Strike 2RX 460164 FPSMobility Radeon 9700144 FPSRX 460113 FPSMobility Radeon 9700101 FPSRX 46062 FPSMobility Radeon 970054 FPSRX 46022 FPSMobility Radeon 970020 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077RX 460106 FPSMobility Radeon 970093 FPSRX 46090 FPSMobility Radeon 970080 FPSRX 46045 FPSMobility Radeon 970039 FPSRX 46015 FPSMobility Radeon 970013 FPS
Forza Horizon 5RX 460133 FPSMobility Radeon 9700117 FPSRX 46085 FPSMobility Radeon 970076 FPSRX 46056 FPSMobility Radeon 970049 FPSRX 46032 FPSMobility Radeon 970029 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyRX 46086 FPSMobility Radeon 970076 FPSRX 46071 FPSMobility Radeon 970063 FPSRX 46041 FPSMobility Radeon 970035 FPSRX 46015 FPSMobility Radeon 970013 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100322910%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100372347%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100392160%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100562186%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001000200%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100431787%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100411878%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100392160%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 1004514105%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100392160%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12.09.0
Vulkan1.3Not supported
OpenGL4.62.0
UpscalingNot supportedNot supported
Compute APIOpenCL 2.1Not supported
Architecture and release
ArchitectureGCN 4.0Radeon R300/R400Better
Process node14 nmBetter130 nm
Release date20162004
Device classDesktopMobile
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count3000 millionBetter76 million
Die size123 mm²92 mm²Better
Shader units / cores896Not publicly specified
Base clock1090 MHzBetter450 MHz
Boost clock1200 MHzBetter450 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 3x8AGP 8x
Length170 mmOEM dependent
ThicknessDual-slotOEM dependent
Recommended PSU250 WOEM dependent
Power connectorNoneIntegrated laptop power
Display outputs and limits
HDMIHDMI 2.0bOEM dependent
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4aOEM dependent
USB Type-CNoOEM dependent
Max monitors3OEM dependent
Max resolution7680 × 4320OEM dependent
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM2 GB GDDR5Better0.064 GB DDR
Memory typeGDDR5DDR / DDR2
Memory bus128 bit128 bit
TFLOPS2.15Not published (legacy architecture)
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 67
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (4)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (3)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: RX 460 or Mobility Radeon 9700?+
RX 460 has the higher overall gaming score, while RX 460 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
RX 460 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
RX 460 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
RX 460 offers more overall performance, while RX 460 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RX 460 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
RX 460 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
RX 460 leads in combined 1440p performance. RX 460 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RX 460 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
RX 460 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
RX 460 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to RX 460 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.