AMD
Radeon RX 470 4GB vs Intel Arc Pro B60
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
Intel
Arc Pro B60
Aggregate performance score
We've compared RX 470 4GB and Arc Pro B60 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗RX 470 4GB outperforms Arc Pro B60 by ~2% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+2%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Partially verifiedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 16Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: Radeon RX 470 4GB (~2%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider RX 470 4GB
- Lower stated power consumption
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 2.0 / DirectCompute 5.0 · Not supported
Reasons to consider Arc Pro B60
- Higher catalog performance index
- More graphics memory
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0 / oneAPI · Intel XeSS
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMD
IntelPerformance
Efficiency
Memory capacity
3652
10087
56100
Graphics card ranking
Positions 112–117of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon RX 470 4GB
143 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
36
52Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
32
44Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
30
41Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
87
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
55Better
54
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Device class
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
HDMI
DisplayPort
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumption—
Memory type
Power connector
Release date
Launch price——
Clock speedBetter
Base clock
Boost clock
VRAMBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory busBetter
Memory bandwidthBetter
Interface
Power consumptionBetter
Process nodeBetter
Architecture
Transistor count
Die size
Shader units / coresBetter
Memory cache
Max monitors
Max resolution
USB Type-C
Recommended PSU
Length
Thickness
Compute API
Upscaling
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares RX 470 4GB and Arc Pro B60 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
RX 470 4GBArc Pro B60
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
185 FPS
—
1080p Ultra
129 FPS
—
1440p Ultra
71 FPS
—
4K Ultra
25 FPS
—
Counter-Strike 2RX 470 4GB185 FPSArc Pro B60—RX 470 4GB129 FPSArc Pro B60—RX 470 4GB71 FPSArc Pro B60—RX 470 4GB25 FPSArc Pro B60—
Cyberpunk 2077RX 470 4GB119 FPSArc Pro B60—RX 470 4GB102 FPSArc Pro B60—RX 470 4GB52 FPSArc Pro B60—RX 470 4GB17 FPSArc Pro B60—
Forza Horizon 5RX 470 4GB151 FPSArc Pro B60—RX 470 4GB96 FPSArc Pro B60—RX 470 4GB64 FPSArc Pro B60—RX 470 4GB36 FPSArc Pro B60—
Hogwarts LegacyRX 470 4GB98 FPSArc Pro B60—RX 470 4GB81 FPSArc Pro B60—RX 470 4GB46 FPSArc Pro B60—RX 470 4GB17 FPSArc Pro B60—
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100365236%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100406040%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100426543%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 1005610056%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001008714%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100457449%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100447147%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100426543%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100477850%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100426644%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12.0DirectX 12 Ultimate
Vulkan1.21.3
OpenGL4.6Up to 4.6
UpscalingNot supportedIntel XeSS
Compute APIOpenCL 2.0 / DirectCompute 5.0OpenCL 3.0 / oneAPI
Architecture and release
ArchitecturePolarisXe2
Process node14 nmTSMC N5Better
Release date2016Q2'25
Device classDesktopProf
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count5700 millionNot publicly specified
Die size232 mm²Not publicly specified
Shader units / cores2048Better20 Xe cores
Base clock926 MHzNot publicly specified
Boost clock1206 MHzNot publicly specified
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 3x16PCI Express 5.0 x8
LengthVaries by boardVaries by board manufacturer
ThicknessVaries by boardVaries by board manufacturer
Recommended PSUVaries by boardNot publicly specified
Power connector8 pinVaries by board manufacturer
Display outputs and limits
HDMIHDMI 2.0bHDMI 2.1; board dependent
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4DisplayPort 2.1; board dependent
USB Type-CNoVaries by board manufacturer
Max monitorsVaries by board4
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 x 4320@120Hz
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM4 GB GDDR524 GB GDDR6Better
Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Memory bus256 bitBetter192 bit
TFLOPS4.9412.28Better
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 16
- Specifications
- 23 / 67
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (3)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (2)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: RX 470 4GB or Arc Pro B60?+
RX 470 4GB has the higher overall gaming score, while RX 470 4GB offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
RX 470 4GB is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
RX 470 4GB is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
RX 470 4GB offers more overall performance, while RX 470 4GB offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RX 470 4GB is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
RX 470 4GB is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
RX 470 4GB leads in combined 1440p performance. RX 470 4GB can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RX 470 4GB is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
RX 470 4GB is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
RX 470 4GB is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to RX 470 4GB if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.