AMD
Radeon RX 470 8GB vs Intel Arc A730M
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
Intel
Intel Arc A730M
Aggregate performance score
We've compared RX 470 8GB and Intel Arc A730M across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗Intel Arc A730M outperforms RX 470 8GB by ~23% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+23%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: Radeon RX 470 8GB (~2%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider RX 470 8GB
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 2.0 / DirectCompute 5.0 · Not supported
Reasons to consider Intel Arc A730M
- Higher catalog performance index
- More graphics memory
- Lower stated power consumption
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0 · XeSS
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMD
IntelPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
3948
100100
10060
6880
Graphics card ranking
Positions 90–95of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon RX 470 8GB
122 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
39
48Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
34
41Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
32
39Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100
100
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
57Better
56
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Device class
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
HDMI
DisplayPort
USB Type-C
Recommended PSU
Length
Thickness
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Memory type
Power connector
Release date
Launch price——
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAMBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory busBetter
Memory bandwidthBetter
Interface
Power consumptionBetter
Process nodeBetter
Architecture
Transistor countBetter
Die sizeBetter
Shader units / coresBetter
Memory cacheBetter
Max monitors
Max resolution
Compute API
Upscaling
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares RX 470 8GB and Intel Arc A730M across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
RX 470 8GBIntel Arc A730M
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
186 FPS
207 FPS
1080p Ultra
130 FPS
145 FPS
1440p Ultra
89 FPS
113 FPS
4K Ultra
29 FPS
46 FPS
Counter-Strike 2RX 470 8GB186 FPSIntel Arc A730M207 FPSRX 470 8GB130 FPSIntel Arc A730M145 FPSRX 470 8GB89 FPSIntel Arc A730M113 FPSRX 470 8GB29 FPSIntel Arc A730M46 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077RX 470 8GB120 FPSIntel Arc A730M134 FPSRX 470 8GB103 FPSIntel Arc A730M115 FPSRX 470 8GB64 FPSIntel Arc A730M82 FPSRX 470 8GB20 FPSIntel Arc A730M31 FPS
Forza Horizon 5RX 470 8GB151 FPSIntel Arc A730M168 FPSRX 470 8GB98 FPSIntel Arc A730M109 FPSRX 470 8GB80 FPSIntel Arc A730M102 FPSRX 470 8GB43 FPSIntel Arc A730M68 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyRX 470 8GB98 FPSIntel Arc A730M109 FPSRX 470 8GB82 FPSIntel Arc A730M91 FPSRX 470 8GB58 FPSIntel Arc A730M73 FPSRX 470 8GB20 FPSIntel Arc A730M31 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100394821%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100445624%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100475719%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100688016%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001001000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100526218%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100516118%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100475719%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100556517%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100485819%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12.012.2
Vulkan1.21.4
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingNot supportedXeSS
Compute APIOpenCL 2.0 / DirectCompute 5.0OpenCL 3.0
Architecture and release
ArchitecturePolarisXe HPG (Alchemist)
Process node14 nm6 nmBetter
Release date20162022
Device classDesktopMobile
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count5700 million21700 millionBetter
Die size232 mm²Better406 mm²
Shader units / cores20483072Better
Base clock926 MHz1100 MHzBetter
Boost clock1206 MHz2050 MHzBetter
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 3x16PCIe 4.0 x16
LengthVaries by boardOEM dependent
ThicknessVaries by boardIGP
Recommended PSUVaries by boardOEM dependent
Power connector8 pinIntegrated laptop power
Display outputs and limits
HDMIHDMI 2.0bOEM dependent
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4OEM dependent
USB Type-CNoOEM dependent
Max monitorsVaries by boardOEM dependent
Max resolution7680 × 4320Depends on host system
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM8 GB GDDR512 GB GDDR6Better
Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Memory bus256 bitBetter192 bit
TFLOPS4.9412.6Better
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 68
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (4)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (3)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: RX 470 8GB or Intel Arc A730M?+
RX 470 8GB has the higher overall gaming score, while RX 470 8GB offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
RX 470 8GB is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
RX 470 8GB is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
RX 470 8GB offers more overall performance, while RX 470 8GB offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RX 470 8GB is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
RX 470 8GB is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
RX 470 8GB leads in combined 1440p performance. RX 470 8GB can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RX 470 8GB is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Intel Arc A730M is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Intel Arc A730M is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to RX 470 8GB if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.