AMD
Radeon RX 470D vs GeForce GTX 680
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
NVIDIA
GTX 680
Aggregate performance score
We've compared RX 470D and GTX 680 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗RX 470D outperforms GTX 680 by ~3% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+3%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: Radeon RX 470D (~38%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider RX 470D
- Higher catalog performance index
- Lower stated power consumption
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 2.1 · Not supported
Reasons to consider GTX 680
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 3.0 · Not supported
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMD
NVIDIAPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
3635
10060
10069
5656
Graphics card ranking
Positions 223–228of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon RX 470D
166 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
36Better
35
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
32
32
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
30Better
29
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
60
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
55Better
40
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
DisplayPort
HDMI
Device class
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Architecture
Thickness
Memory type
Power connector
Release date
Compute API
Launch priceBetter
Shader units / coresBetter
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAMBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory bus
Memory bandwidthBetter
Interface
Power consumptionBetter
Process nodeBetter
Recommended PSUBetter
LengthBetter
Die sizeBetter
Memory cache
Transistor countBetter
Max monitors
Max resolution
USB Type-C
Upscaling
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares RX 470D and GTX 680 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
RX 470DGTX 680
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
184 FPS
178 FPS
1080p Ultra
128 FPS
122 FPS
1440p Ultra
71 FPS
67 FPS
4K Ultra
25 FPS
24 FPS
Counter-Strike 2RX 470D184 FPSGTX 680178 FPSRX 470D128 FPSGTX 680122 FPSRX 470D71 FPSGTX 68067 FPSRX 470D25 FPSGTX 68024 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077RX 470D119 FPSGTX 680115 FPSRX 470D101 FPSGTX 68096 FPSRX 470D51 FPSGTX 68048 FPSRX 470D16 FPSGTX 68016 FPS
Forza Horizon 5RX 470D150 FPSGTX 680145 FPSRX 470D96 FPSGTX 68091 FPSRX 470D64 FPSGTX 68060 FPSRX 470D36 FPSGTX 68035 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyRX 470D97 FPSGTX 68094 FPSRX 470D80 FPSGTX 68076 FPSRX 470D46 FPSGTX 68043 FPSRX 470D17 FPSGTX 68016 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10036353%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10040385%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10042412%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 10056560%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001006050%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10045442%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10044432%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10042412%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 10047462%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10042412%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12.011.0
Vulkan1.31.2
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingNot supportedNot supported
Compute APIOpenCL 2.1OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 3.0
Architecture and release
ArchitectureGCN 4.0Kepler
Process node14 nmBetter28 nm
Release date20162012
Device classDesktopDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count5700 millionBetter3540 million
Die size232 mm²Better294 mm²
Shader units / cores1792Better1536
Base clock926 MHz1006 MHzBetter
Boost clock1206 MHzBetter1058 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 3x16PCIe 3x16
Length241 mmBetter256 mm
ThicknessDual-slotDual-slot
Recommended PSU300 WBetter450 W
Power connector6 pin6+6 pin
Display outputs and limits
HDMIHDMI 2.0bHDMI 1.4a
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4aDisplayPort 1.2
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitors44
Max resolution7680 × 43204096 × 2160
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM4 GB GDDR5Better2 GB GDDR5
Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Memory bus256 bit256 bit
TFLOPS4.322Better3.25
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 70
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (4)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (5)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record changed: product_prices
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: RX 470D or GTX 680?+
RX 470D has the higher overall gaming score, while RX 470D offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
GTX 680 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
GTX 680 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
RX 470D offers more overall performance, while RX 470D offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
GTX 680 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
RX 470D is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
RX 470D leads in combined 1440p performance. RX 470D can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RX 470D is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
RX 470D is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
RX 470D is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to RX 470D if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.