AMD
Radeon RX 480 4GB vs GeForce 210
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
NVIDIA
210
Aggregate performance score
We've compared RX 480 4GB and 210 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗RX 480 4GB outperforms 210 by ~23% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+23%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: Radeon RX 480 4GB (~2%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider RX 480 4GB
- Higher catalog performance index
- More graphics memory
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 2.0 / DirectCompute 5.0 · Not supported
Reasons to consider 210
- Lower stated power consumption
- Lower recorded market price
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.2 · Not supported
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMD
NVIDIAPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
3831
84100
100100
5643
Graphics card ranking
Positions 125–130of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce 210
83 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
38Better
31
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
34Better
29
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
31Better
26
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
84
100Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
53Better
52
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Device class
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
HDMI
DisplayPort
USB Type-C
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Memory type
Power connector
Release date
Launch price—
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAMBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory busBetter
Memory bandwidthBetter
Interface
Power consumptionBetter
Process nodeBetter
Architecture
Transistor countBetter
Die sizeBetter
Shader units / coresBetter
Memory cacheBetter
Max monitors
Max resolution
Recommended PSU
Length
Thickness
Compute API
Upscaling
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares RX 480 4GB and 210 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
RX 480 4GB210
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
187 FPS
154 FPS
1080p Ultra
132 FPS
108 FPS
1440p Ultra
76 FPS
58 FPS
4K Ultra
26 FPS
21 FPS
Counter-Strike 2RX 480 4GB187 FPS210154 FPSRX 480 4GB132 FPS210108 FPSRX 480 4GB76 FPS21058 FPSRX 480 4GB26 FPS21021 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077RX 480 4GB121 FPS210100 FPSRX 480 4GB104 FPS21086 FPSRX 480 4GB55 FPS21042 FPSRX 480 4GB18 FPS21014 FPS
Forza Horizon 5RX 480 4GB153 FPS210126 FPSRX 480 4GB99 FPS21081 FPSRX 480 4GB69 FPS21052 FPSRX 480 4GB39 FPS21031 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyRX 480 4GB99 FPS21081 FPSRX 480 4GB83 FPS21068 FPSRX 480 4GB50 FPS21038 FPSRX 480 4GB18 FPS21014 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100383120%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100413128%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100433423%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100564326%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1008410017%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100463624%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100453622%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100433423%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100483823%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100433521%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12.010.1
Vulkan1.2Not supported
OpenGL4.63.3
UpscalingNot supportedNot supported
Compute APIOpenCL 2.0 / DirectCompute 5.0OpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.2
Architecture and release
ArchitecturePolarisTesla 2.0
Process node14 nmBetter40 nm
Release date20162009
Device classDesktopDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count5700 millionBetter260 million
Die size232 mm²57 mm²Better
Shader units / cores2304Better16
Base clock1120 MHzBetter589 MHz
Boost clock1266 MHzBetter589 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 3x16PCIe 2x16
LengthVaries by board168 mm
ThicknessVaries by boardSingle-slot
Recommended PSUVaries by board200 W
Power connector8 pinNone
Display outputs and limits
HDMIHDMI 2.0bBoard dependent
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4DisplayPort
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitorsVaries by board3
Max resolution7680 × 43204096 × 2160
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM4 GB GDDR5Better1 GB DDR3
Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Memory bus256 bitBetter64 bit
TFLOPS5.834Better0.039
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 69
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (5)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (4)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: RX 480 4GB or 210?+
RX 480 4GB has the higher overall gaming score, while RX 480 4GB offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
210 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
210 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
RX 480 4GB offers more overall performance, while RX 480 4GB offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
210 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
RX 480 4GB is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
RX 480 4GB leads in combined 1440p performance. RX 480 4GB can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RX 480 4GB is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
210 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
210 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to RX 480 4GB if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.