AMD
Radeon RX 480 4GB vs GeForce MX230
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
NVIDIA
GeForce MX230
Aggregate performance score
We've compared RX 480 4GB and GeForce MX230 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗RX 480 4GB outperforms GeForce MX230 by ~23% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+23%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: Radeon RX 480 4GB (~23%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider RX 480 4GB
- Higher catalog performance index
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 2.0 / DirectCompute 5.0 · Not supported
Reasons to consider GeForce MX230
- Lower stated power consumption
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 6.1 · NVIDIA Image Scaling (NIS)
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMD
NVIDIAPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
3831
84100
10054
5656
Graphics card ranking
Positions 125–130of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce MX230
63 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
38Better
31
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
34Better
29
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
31Better
26
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
84
100Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
53Better
43
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Device class
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
HDMI
DisplayPort
USB Type-C
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Memory type
Power connector
Release date
Launch price——
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAMBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory busBetter
Memory bandwidthBetter
Interface
Power consumptionBetter
Process node
Architecture
Transistor countBetter
Die sizeBetter
Shader units / coresBetter
Memory cache
Max monitors
Max resolution
Recommended PSU
Length
Thickness
Compute API
Upscaling
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares RX 480 4GB and GeForce MX230 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
RX 480 4GBGeForce MX230
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
187 FPS
156 FPS
1080p Ultra
132 FPS
110 FPS
1440p Ultra
76 FPS
59 FPS
4K Ultra
26 FPS
21 FPS
Counter-Strike 2RX 480 4GB187 FPSGeForce MX230156 FPSRX 480 4GB132 FPSGeForce MX230110 FPSRX 480 4GB76 FPSGeForce MX23059 FPSRX 480 4GB26 FPSGeForce MX23021 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077RX 480 4GB121 FPSGeForce MX230101 FPSRX 480 4GB104 FPSGeForce MX23087 FPSRX 480 4GB55 FPSGeForce MX23043 FPSRX 480 4GB18 FPSGeForce MX23014 FPS
Forza Horizon 5RX 480 4GB153 FPSGeForce MX230127 FPSRX 480 4GB99 FPSGeForce MX23082 FPSRX 480 4GB69 FPSGeForce MX23053 FPSRX 480 4GB39 FPSGeForce MX23031 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyRX 480 4GB99 FPSGeForce MX23082 FPSRX 480 4GB83 FPSGeForce MX23069 FPSRX 480 4GB50 FPSGeForce MX23038 FPSRX 480 4GB18 FPSGeForce MX23014 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100383120%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10041388%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100433812%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 10056560%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1008410017%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10046429%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10045419%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100433812%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 10048456%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100433812%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12.012.1
Vulkan1.21.4
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingNot supportedNVIDIA Image Scaling (NIS)
Compute APIOpenCL 2.0 / DirectCompute 5.0OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 6.1
Architecture and release
ArchitecturePolarisPascal / Turing / Ampere
Process node14 nm14 nm
Release date20162019
Device classDesktopMobile
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count5700 millionBetter1800 million
Die size232 mm²74 mm²Better
Shader units / cores2304Better256
Base clock1120 MHz1519 MHzBetter
Boost clock1266 MHz1531 MHzBetter
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 3x16PCIe 3.0 x4
LengthVaries by boardOEM dependent
ThicknessVaries by boardIGP
Recommended PSUVaries by boardOEM dependent
Power connector8 pinNone
Display outputs and limits
HDMIHDMI 2.0bOEM dependent
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4OEM dependent
USB Type-CNoOEM dependent
Max monitorsVaries by boardOEM dependent
Max resolution7680 × 4320Depends on host system
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM4 GB GDDR5Better2 GB GDDR5
Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5 / GDDR6
Memory bus256 bitBetter64 bit
TFLOPS5.834Better0.784
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 68
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (4)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (3)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: RX 480 4GB or GeForce MX230?+
RX 480 4GB has the higher overall gaming score, while RX 480 4GB offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
GeForce MX230 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
GeForce MX230 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
RX 480 4GB offers more overall performance, while RX 480 4GB offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
GeForce MX230 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
RX 480 4GB is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
RX 480 4GB leads in combined 1440p performance. RX 480 4GB can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RX 480 4GB is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
GeForce MX230 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
GeForce MX230 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to RX 480 4GB if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.