AMD
Radeon RX 550 2GB vs Intel Arc A370M
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
Intel
Intel Arc A370M
Aggregate performance score
We've compared RX 550 2GB and Intel Arc A370M across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗Intel Arc A370M outperforms RX 550 2GB by ~3% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+3%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 15, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: Radeon RX 550 2GB (~18%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider RX 550 2GB
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 2.0 / DirectCompute 5.0 · Not supported
Reasons to consider Intel Arc A370M
- Higher catalog performance index
- More graphics memory
- Lower stated power consumption
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0 · XeSS
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMD
IntelPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
3233
100100
10055
5660
Graphics card ranking
Positions 159–164of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon RX 550 2GB
164 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
32
33Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
29
30Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
27
28Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100
100
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
52Better
44
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Memory frequencyBetter
Device class
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
HDMI
DisplayPort
Transistor countBetter
Die sizeBetter
Shader units / coresBetter
Memory cacheBetter
Thickness
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Release date
Memory type
Launch price——
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAMBetter
Memory busBetter
Memory bandwidth
Interface
Power consumptionBetter
Process nodeBetter
Architecture
Max monitors
Max resolution
USB Type-C
Recommended PSU
Length
Power connector
Compute API
Upscaling
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares RX 550 2GB and Intel Arc A370M across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
RX 550 2GBIntel Arc A370M
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
162 FPS
166 FPS
1080p Ultra
112 FPS
116 FPS
1440p Ultra
62 FPS
63 FPS
4K Ultra
22 FPS
22 FPS
Counter-Strike 2RX 550 2GB162 FPSIntel Arc A370M166 FPSRX 550 2GB112 FPSIntel Arc A370M116 FPSRX 550 2GB62 FPSIntel Arc A370M63 FPSRX 550 2GB22 FPSIntel Arc A370M22 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077RX 550 2GB104 FPSIntel Arc A370M107 FPSRX 550 2GB89 FPSIntel Arc A370M92 FPSRX 550 2GB45 FPSIntel Arc A370M45 FPSRX 550 2GB15 FPSIntel Arc A370M15 FPS
Forza Horizon 5RX 550 2GB132 FPSIntel Arc A370M135 FPSRX 550 2GB84 FPSIntel Arc A370M87 FPSRX 550 2GB56 FPSIntel Arc A370M57 FPSRX 550 2GB32 FPSIntel Arc A370M33 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyRX 550 2GB85 FPSIntel Arc A370M87 FPSRX 550 2GB70 FPSIntel Arc A370M73 FPSRX 550 2GB40 FPSIntel Arc A370M41 FPSRX 550 2GB15 FPSIntel Arc A370M15 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10032333%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100374213%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10039415%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 10056607%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001001000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10043455%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10041447%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10039415%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 10045486%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10039415%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12.012.2
Vulkan1.21.4
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingNot supportedXeSS
Compute APIOpenCL 2.0 / DirectCompute 5.0OpenCL 3.0
Architecture and release
ArchitecturePolarisXe HPG (Alchemist)
Process node14 nm6 nmBetter
Release date20172022
Device classDesktopMobile
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count2200 million7200 millionBetter
Die size103 mm²Better157 mm²
Shader units / cores6401024Better
Base clock1100 MHz1550 MHzBetter
Boost clock1183 MHz2050 MHzBetter
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 3x8PCIe 4.0 x8
LengthVaries by boardOEM dependent
ThicknessVaries by boardIGP
Recommended PSUVaries by boardOEM dependent
Power connectorNone (slot power)Integrated laptop power
Display outputs and limits
HDMIHDMI 2.0bOEM dependent
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4OEM dependent
USB Type-CNoOEM dependent
Max monitorsVaries by boardOEM dependent
Max resolution7680 × 4320Depends on host system
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM2 GB GDDR54 GB GDDR6Better
Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Memory bus128 bitBetter64 bit
TFLOPS1.2114.198Better
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 68
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (4)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (5)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: RX 550 2GB or Intel Arc A370M?+
RX 550 2GB has the higher overall gaming score, while RX 550 2GB offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
RX 550 2GB is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
RX 550 2GB is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
RX 550 2GB offers more overall performance, while RX 550 2GB offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RX 550 2GB is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
RX 550 2GB is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
RX 550 2GB leads in combined 1440p performance. RX 550 2GB can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RX 550 2GB is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Intel Arc A370M is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Intel Arc A370M is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to RX 550 2GB if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.