AMD
Radeon RX 550 4GB vs Radeon HD 6930
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
AMD
HD 6930
Aggregate performance score
We've compared RX 550 4GB and HD 6930 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗HD 6930 outperforms RX 550 4GB by ~3% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+3%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: Radeon RX 550 4GB (~16%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider RX 550 4GB
- Lower stated power consumption
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 2.0 / DirectCompute 5.0 · Not supported
Reasons to consider HD 6930
- Higher catalog performance index
- Lower recorded market price
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 1.2 · Not supported
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMDPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
3233
10059
100100
5656
Graphics card ranking
Positions 160–165of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
32
33Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
29
30Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
27
28Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
59
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
52Better
45
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Device class
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
HDMI
DisplayPort
Transistor countBetter
Die sizeBetter
Shader units / coresBetter
Memory cache
Max monitors
Max resolution
USB Type-C
Recommended PSU
Length
Thickness
Power consumptionBetter
TFLOPSBetter
Memory type
Release date
Launch price—
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAMBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory busBetter
Memory bandwidthBetter
Interface
Power consumptionBetter
Process nodeBetter
Architecture
Upscaling
Power connector
Compute API
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares RX 550 4GB and HD 6930 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
RX 550 4GBHD 6930
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
162 FPS
167 FPS
1080p Ultra
112 FPS
114 FPS
1440p Ultra
62 FPS
63 FPS
4K Ultra
22 FPS
23 FPS
Counter-Strike 2RX 550 4GB162 FPSHD 6930167 FPSRX 550 4GB112 FPSHD 6930114 FPSRX 550 4GB62 FPSHD 693063 FPSRX 550 4GB22 FPSHD 693023 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077RX 550 4GB105 FPSHD 6930108 FPSRX 550 4GB89 FPSHD 693090 FPSRX 550 4GB45 FPSHD 693046 FPSRX 550 4GB15 FPSHD 693016 FPS
Forza Horizon 5RX 550 4GB132 FPSHD 6930136 FPSRX 550 4GB84 FPSHD 693085 FPSRX 550 4GB56 FPSHD 693057 FPSRX 550 4GB32 FPSHD 693034 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyRX 550 4GB85 FPSHD 693088 FPSRX 550 4GB70 FPSHD 693071 FPSRX 550 4GB40 FPSHD 693041 FPSRX 550 4GB15 FPSHD 693016 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10032333%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10037356%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10039390%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 10056560%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001005952%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10043430%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10041422%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10039390%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 10045450%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10039403%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12.011.0
Vulkan1.2Not supported
OpenGL4.64.4
UpscalingNot supportedNot supported
Compute APIOpenCL 2.0 / DirectCompute 5.0OpenCL 1.2
Architecture and release
ArchitecturePolarisTeraScale 3
Process node14 nmBetter40 nm
Release date20172011
Device classDesktopDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count2200 million2640 millionBetter
Die size103 mm²Better389 mm²
Shader units / cores6401280Better
Base clock1100 MHzBetter750 MHz
Boost clock1183 MHzBetter750 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 3x8PCIe 2x16
LengthVaries by board220 mm
ThicknessVaries by boardDual-slot
Recommended PSUVaries by board450 W
Power connectorNone (slot power)6+6 pin
Display outputs and limits
HDMIHDMI 2.0bHDMI 1.4a
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4mini-DisplayPort 1.2
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitorsVaries by board5
Max resolution7680 × 43204096 × 2160
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM4 GB GDDR5Better1 GB GDDR5
Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Memory bus128 bit256 bitBetter
TFLOPS1.2111.92Better
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 69
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (5)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (4)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: RX 550 4GB or HD 6930?+
RX 550 4GB has the higher overall gaming score, while RX 550 4GB offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
RX 550 4GB is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
RX 550 4GB is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
RX 550 4GB offers more overall performance, while RX 550 4GB offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RX 550 4GB is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
RX 550 4GB is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
RX 550 4GB leads in combined 1440p performance. RX 550 4GB can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RX 550 4GB is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
RX 550 4GB is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
RX 550 4GB is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to RX 550 4GB if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.