AMD
Radeon RX 5500 vs Radeon RX 6500 XT
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
AMD
RX 6500 XT
Aggregate performance score
We've compared RX 5500 and RX 6500 XT across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗RX 5500 outperforms RX 6500 XT by ~6% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+6%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: Radeon RX 5500 (~2%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider RX 5500
- Higher catalog performance index
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 2.1 · FSR
Reasons to consider RX 6500 XT
- Lower stated power consumption
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 2.2 · FSR
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMDPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
3735
82100
10084
6060
Graphics card ranking
Positions 114–119of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon RX 5500
115 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Radeon RX 5500
Price $60.00Based on catalog performance per unit of current market price, not measured FPS.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
37Better
35
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
33Better
32
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
31Better
29
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
82
100Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
52Better
51
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Device class
Upscaling
HDMI
DisplayPort
USB Type-C
Recommended PSU
Length
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Memory type
Power connector
Release date
ArchitectureBetter
Compute API
Launch priceBetter
Shader units / coresBetter
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAM
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory busBetter
Memory bandwidthBetter
Interface
Power consumptionBetter
Process nodeBetter
Die sizeBetter
Memory cacheBetter
Transistor countBetter
Max monitors
Max resolution
Thickness
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares RX 5500 and RX 6500 XT across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
RX 5500RX 6500 XT
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
189 FPS
178 FPS
1080p Ultra
133 FPS
122 FPS
1440p Ultra
77 FPS
66 FPS
4K Ultra
23 FPS
24 FPS
Counter-Strike 2RX 5500189 FPSRX 6500 XT178 FPSRX 5500133 FPSRX 6500 XT122 FPSRX 550077 FPSRX 6500 XT66 FPSRX 550023 FPSRX 6500 XT24 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077RX 5500122 FPSRX 6500 XT115 FPSRX 5500105 FPSRX 6500 XT97 FPSRX 550056 FPSRX 6500 XT48 FPSRX 550015 FPSRX 6500 XT16 FPS
Forza Horizon 5RX 5500154 FPSRX 6500 XT145 FPSRX 550099 FPSRX 6500 XT92 FPSRX 550070 FPSRX 6500 XT59 FPSRX 550034 FPSRX 6500 XT35 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyRX 550099 FPSRX 6500 XT94 FPSRX 550083 FPSRX 6500 XT77 FPSRX 550050 FPSRX 6500 XT43 FPSRX 550016 FPSRX 6500 XT16 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10037356%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10044489%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10044425%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 10060600%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1008210020%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10048464%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10046452%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10044425%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 10050492%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10044432%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12.112.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingFSRFSR
Compute APIOpenCL 2.1OpenCL 2.2
Architecture and release
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0RDNA 2.0Better
Process node7 nm6 nmBetter
Release date20192022
Device classDesktopDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count6400 millionBetter5400 million
Die size158 mm²107 mm²Better
Shader units / cores1408Better1024
Base clock1500 MHz2310 MHzBetter
Boost clock1845 MHz2815 MHzBetter
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 4x8PCIe 4x4
LengthVaries by boardVaries by board
ThicknessVaries by boardDual-slot
Recommended PSUVaries by board300 W
Power connector8 pin6 pin
Display outputs and limits
HDMIHDMI 2.0bHDMI 2.1
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4DisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitorsVaries by board2
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM4 GB GDDR64 GB GDDR6
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Memory bus128 bitBetter64 bit
TFLOPS5.1965.765Better
Other comparisons
GTX 1050 3GBNVIDIAReviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 70
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (5)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (5)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record changed: product_prices
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: RX 5500 or RX 6500 XT?+
RX 5500 has the higher overall gaming score, while RX 5500 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
RX 5500 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
RX 5500 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
RX 5500 offers more overall performance, while RX 5500 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RX 5500 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
RX 5500 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
RX 5500 leads in combined 1440p performance. RX 5500 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RX 5500 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
RX 6500 XT is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
RX 6500 XT is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to RX 5500 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.