AMD
Radeon RX 5500 XT vs Radeon RX 5600
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
AMD
RX 5600
Aggregate performance score
We've compared RX 5500 XT and RX 5600 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗RX 5500 XT outperforms RX 5600 by 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+1%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.Radeon RX 5500 XT vs Radeon RX 5600: key takeaway
The comparison of RX 5500 XT and RX 5600 shows a 0% advantage for RX 5500 XT in gaming performance, while RX 5600 may still be stronger in efficiency and feature set. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMDPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
3939
100100
100100
6860
COMPARISON RESULT
The devices received the same overall score
RX 5500 XT leads in combined game performance. RX 5500 XT offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
Performance is nearly identical
RX 5500 XT costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 112–117of 317
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon RX 5500 XT
98 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Radeon RX 5500 XT
100/100 · Price $229The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
OVERALL SCORE
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
The Summary score section compares RX 5500 XT and RX 5600 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
39
39
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
34
34
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
32
32
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100
100
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
62
62
FULL COMPARISON
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
The Specifications section compares RX 5500 XT and RX 5600 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4aDisplayPort 1.4a
HDMIHDMI 2.0bHDMI 2.1
Device classDesktopDesktop
UpscalingFSRFSR
DirectX12.112.1
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
TFLOPS5.1966.39Better
Power consumption130 W125 WBetter
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Power connector8 pin8 pin
Release date20192020
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0RDNA 1.0
ThicknessDual-slotIGP
Compute APIOpenCL 2.1OpenCL 2.1
Launch price$229$229
Shader units / cores14082304Better
Clock speed1607 - 1845 MHzBetter1130 - 1560 MHz
Base clock1607 MHzBetter1130 MHz
Boost clock1845 MHzBetter1560 MHz
VRAM8 GB GDDR6Better6 GB GDDR6
Memory frequency14 GHzBetter12 GHz
Memory bus128 bit192 bitBetter
Memory bandwidth224 GB/s288 GB/sBetter
InterfacePCIe 4x8PCIe 4x16
Power consumption130 W125 WBetter
Process node7 nm7 nm
Recommended PSU300 WVaries by board
Length180 mmVaries by board
Die size158 mm²Better251 mm²
Memory cacheL2 2 MBL2 3 MB
Transistor count6400 million10300 millionBetter
Max monitors44
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320
USB Type-CNoNo
GAME TEST BENCH
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares RX 5500 XT and RX 5600 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
RX 5500 XTRX 5600
Verified H2HCommunity VerifiedEstimatedPredicted
Black Myth: Wukong
1080p High
23 FPSEstimated 66%
23 FPSEstimated 66%
1080p Ultra
19 FPSEstimated 66%
19 FPSEstimated 66%
1440p Ultra
12 FPSEstimated 63%
12 FPSEstimated 63%
4K Ultra
5 FPSEstimated 55%
5 FPSEstimated 55%
Black Myth: WukongRX 5500 XT23 FPSEstimated 66%RX 560023 FPSEstimated 66%RX 5500 XT19 FPSEstimated 66%RX 560019 FPSEstimated 66%RX 5500 XT12 FPSEstimated 63%RX 560012 FPSEstimated 63%RX 5500 XT5 FPSEstimated 55%RX 56005 FPSEstimated 55%
Call of Duty: WarzoneRX 5500 XT23 FPSEstimated 66%RX 560023 FPSEstimated 66%RX 5500 XT19 FPSEstimated 66%RX 560019 FPSEstimated 66%RX 5500 XT12 FPSEstimated 63%RX 560012 FPSEstimated 63%RX 5500 XT5 FPSEstimated 55%RX 56005 FPSEstimated 55%
Counter-Strike 2RX 5500 XT190 FPSEstimated 74%RX 5600191 FPSEstimated 74%RX 5500 XT133 FPSEstimated 74%RX 5600134 FPSEstimated 74%RX 5500 XT89 FPSEstimated 71%RX 560088 FPSEstimated 71%RX 5500 XT26 FPSEstimated 63%RX 560027 FPSEstimated 63%
Cyberpunk 2077RX 5500 XT122 FPSEstimated 74%RX 5600123 FPSEstimated 74%RX 5500 XT105 FPSEstimated 74%RX 5600106 FPSEstimated 74%RX 5500 XT64 FPSEstimated 71%RX 560064 FPSEstimated 71%RX 5500 XT17 FPSEstimated 63%RX 560018 FPSEstimated 63%
Forza Horizon 5RX 5500 XT154 FPSEstimated 80%RX 5600156 FPSEstimated 80%RX 5500 XT100 FPSEstimated 74%RX 5600101 FPSEstimated 74%RX 5500 XT80 FPSEstimated 71%RX 560079 FPSEstimated 71%RX 5500 XT38 FPSEstimated 63%RX 560040 FPSEstimated 63%
God of War RagnarökRX 5500 XT23 FPSEstimated 66%RX 560023 FPSEstimated 66%RX 5500 XT19 FPSEstimated 66%RX 560019 FPSEstimated 66%RX 5500 XT12 FPSEstimated 63%RX 560012 FPSEstimated 63%RX 5500 XT5 FPSEstimated 55%RX 56005 FPSEstimated 55%
Hogwarts LegacyRX 5500 XT100 FPSEstimated 74%RX 5600101 FPSEstimated 74%RX 5500 XT84 FPSEstimated 74%RX 560084 FPSEstimated 74%RX 5500 XT58 FPSEstimated 71%RX 560057 FPSEstimated 71%RX 5500 XT18 FPSEstimated 63%RX 560018 FPSEstimated 63%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024RX 5500 XT23 FPSEstimated 66%RX 560023 FPSEstimated 66%RX 5500 XT19 FPSEstimated 66%RX 560019 FPSEstimated 66%RX 5500 XT12 FPSEstimated 63%RX 560012 FPSEstimated 63%RX 5500 XT5 FPSEstimated 55%RX 56005 FPSEstimated 55%
Monster Hunter WildsRX 5500 XT23 FPSEstimated 66%RX 560023 FPSEstimated 66%RX 5500 XT19 FPSEstimated 66%RX 560019 FPSEstimated 66%RX 5500 XT12 FPSEstimated 63%RX 560012 FPSEstimated 63%RX 5500 XT5 FPSEstimated 55%RX 56005 FPSEstimated 55%
StarfieldRX 5500 XT23 FPSEstimated 66%RX 560023 FPSEstimated 66%RX 5500 XT19 FPSEstimated 66%RX 560019 FPSEstimated 66%RX 5500 XT12 FPSEstimated 63%RX 560012 FPSEstimated 63%RX 5500 XT5 FPSEstimated 55%RX 56005 FPSEstimated 55%
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
The Benchmarks section compares RX 5500 XT and RX 5600 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10039390%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10047447%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10047454%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100686013%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001001000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
The Detailed comparison section compares RX 5500 XT and RX 5600 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10052496%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10051486%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10047454%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 10055518%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10048456%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
The Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling section compares RX 5500 XT and RX 5600 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
DirectX12.112.1
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingFSRFSR
Compute APIOpenCL 2.1OpenCL 2.1
Architecture and release
The Architecture and release section compares RX 5500 XT and RX 5600 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0RDNA 1.0
Process node7 nm7 nm
Release date20192020
Device classDesktopDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
The Core layout and clocks section compares RX 5500 XT and RX 5600 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
Transistor count6400 million10300 millionBetter
Die size158 mm²Better251 mm²
Shader units / cores14082304Better
Base clock1607 MHzBetter1130 MHz
Boost clock1845 MHzBetter1560 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
The Form factor and compatibility section compares RX 5500 XT and RX 5600 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
InterfacePCIe 4x8PCIe 4x16
Length180 mmVaries by board
ThicknessDual-slotIGP
Recommended PSU300 WVaries by board
Power connector8 pin8 pin
Display outputs and limits
The Display outputs section compares RX 5500 XT and RX 5600 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
HDMIHDMI 2.0bHDMI 2.1
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4aDisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitors44
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320
Memory and compute throughput
The VRAM capacity and bandwidth section compares RX 5500 XT and RX 5600 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
VRAM8 GB GDDR6Better6 GB GDDR6
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Memory bus128 bit192 bitBetter
TFLOPS5.1966.39Better
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Other comparisons
Arc A310Intel
GTX 1050 3GBNVIDIAReviews and questions
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: RX 5500 XT or RX 5600?+
RX 5500 XT has the higher overall gaming score, while RX 5500 XT offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
RX 5500 XT is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
RX 5500 XT is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
RX 5500 XT offers more overall performance, while RX 5500 XT offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RX 5500 XT is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
RX 5500 XT is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
RX 5500 XT leads in combined 1440p performance. RX 5500 XT can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RX 5500 XT is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
RX 5600 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
RX 5600 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to RX 5500 XT if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.