AMD
Radeon RX 560 2GB vs Radeon 535
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
AMD
Radeon 535
Aggregate performance score
We've compared RX 560 2GB and Radeon 535 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗Radeon 535 outperforms RX 560 2GB by ~15% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+15%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: Radeon RX 560 2GB (~33%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider RX 560 2GB
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 2.0 / DirectCompute 5.0 · Not supported
Reasons to consider Radeon 535
- Higher catalog performance index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 2.0 / DirectCompute 5.0 · Not supported
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMDPerformance
Price / performance
3338
10065
Graphics card ranking
Positions 126–131of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon RX 560 2GB
115 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
33
38Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
30
34Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
28
31Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
33
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
53Better
40
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Device class
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
HDMI
DisplayPort
Max monitors
Max resolution
Recommended PSU
Length
Thickness
TFLOPS
Power consumption—
Memory type
Power connector
Release date
Launch price——
Clock speed—
Base clock
Boost clock
VRAM
Memory frequency—
Memory bus
Memory bandwidth—
Interface
Power consumption—
Process node—
Architecture
Transistor count
Die size
Shader units / cores
Memory cache
USB Type-C
Compute API
Upscaling
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares RX 560 2GB and Radeon 535 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
RX 560 2GBRadeon 535
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
165 FPS
157 FPS
1080p Ultra
114 FPS
111 FPS
1440p Ultra
63 FPS
86 FPS
4K Ultra
22 FPS
43 FPS
Counter-Strike 2RX 560 2GB165 FPSRadeon 535157 FPSRX 560 2GB114 FPSRadeon 535111 FPSRX 560 2GB63 FPSRadeon 53586 FPSRX 560 2GB22 FPSRadeon 53543 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077RX 560 2GB107 FPSRadeon 535102 FPSRX 560 2GB90 FPSRadeon 53588 FPSRX 560 2GB46 FPSRadeon 53562 FPSRX 560 2GB15 FPSRadeon 53529 FPS
Forza Horizon 5RX 560 2GB135 FPSRadeon 535128 FPSRX 560 2GB86 FPSRadeon 53583 FPSRX 560 2GB57 FPSRadeon 53577 FPSRX 560 2GB32 FPSRadeon 53563 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyRX 560 2GB87 FPSRadeon 53583 FPSRX 560 2GB72 FPSRadeon 53569 FPSRX 560 2GB41 FPSRadeon 53556 FPSRX 560 2GB15 FPSRadeon 53529 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100333814%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10038380%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10039383%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100560200%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001000200%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100433812%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100423810%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10039383%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100453817%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10040385%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12.012.0
Vulkan1.21.2
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingNot supportedNot supported
Compute APIOpenCL 2.0 / DirectCompute 5.0OpenCL 2.0 / DirectCompute 5.0
Architecture and release
ArchitecturePolarisPolaris
Process node14 nm—
Release date20172017
Device classDesktopMobile
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count3000 millionNot publicly specified
Die size123 mm²Not publicly specified
Shader units / cores896Not publicly specified
Base clock1175 MHzOEM/TGP dependent
Boost clock1275 MHzOEM/TGP dependent
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 3x8OEM platform dependent
LengthVaries by boardOEM dependent
ThicknessVaries by boardOEM dependent
Recommended PSUVaries by boardOEM dependent
Power connector6 pinIntegrated laptop power
Display outputs and limits
HDMIHDMI 2.0bOEM dependent
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4OEM dependent
USB Type-CNoOEM dependent
Max monitorsVaries by boardOEM dependent
Max resolution7680 × 4320OEM dependent
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM2 GB GDDR5OEM configuration dependent
Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Memory bus128 bitOEM configuration dependent
TFLOPS2.611OEM/TGP dependent
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 62
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (4)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (3)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: RX 560 2GB or Radeon 535?+
RX 560 2GB has the higher overall gaming score, while RX 560 2GB offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
RX 560 2GB is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
RX 560 2GB is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
RX 560 2GB offers more overall performance, while RX 560 2GB offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RX 560 2GB is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
RX 560 2GB is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
RX 560 2GB leads in combined 1440p performance. RX 560 2GB can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RX 560 2GB is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
RX 560 2GB is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
RX 560 2GB is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to RX 560 2GB if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.