AMD
Radeon RX 560 4GB vs Radeon RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
AMD
RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled
Aggregate performance score
We've compared RX 560 4GB and RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled outperforms RX 560 4GB by 70% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+70%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.Radeon RX 560 4GB vs Radeon RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled: key takeaway
The comparison of RX 560 4GB and RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled shows a 70% advantage for RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled in gaming performance, while RX 560 4GB may still be stronger in value for money. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMDPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
3356
10053
10054
5688
COMPARISON RESULT
RX 560 4GB is the best overall choice
RX 560 4GB leads in combined game performance. RX 560 4GB offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
RX 560 4GB leads in the combined performance index
RX 560 4GB costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 135–140of 319
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled
154 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Radeon RX 560 4GB
100/100 · Price $179The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
OVERALL SCORE
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
The Summary score section compares RX 560 4GB and RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
33
56Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
30
47Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
28
44Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
53
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
58Better
55
FULL COMPARISON
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
The Specifications section compares RX 560 4GB and RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
Device classDesktopDesktop
DirectX12.012.2
Vulkan1.21.2
OpenGL4.64.6
HDMIHDMI 2.0bHDMI 2.1
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4DisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-CNoNo
Recommended PSUVaries by boardVaries by board
TFLOPS2.61123.04Better
Power consumption75 WBetter350 W
Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Power connector6 pin8+8 pin
Release date20172021
ArchitecturePolarisNot publicly specified
Launch price——
Clock speed1175 - 1275 MHz2050 - 2435 MHzBetter
Base clock1175 MHz2050 MHzBetter
Boost clock1275 MHz2435 MHzBetter
VRAM4 GB GDDR516 GB GDDR6Better
Memory frequency7 GHz18,4 GHzBetter
Memory bus128 bit256 bitBetter
Memory bandwidth112 GB/s589 GB/sBetter
InterfacePCIe 3x8PCIe 4x16
Power consumption75 WBetter350 W
Process node14 nm7 nmBetter
Transistor count3000 millionNot publicly specified
Die size123 mm²Not publicly specified
Shader units / cores896Not publicly specified
Memory cacheL1 16 KB, L2 1 MBNot publicly specified
Max monitorsVaries by board4
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320
LengthVaries by boardVaries by board
ThicknessVaries by boardVaries by board
UpscalingNot supportedFSR
Compute APIOpenCL 2.0 / DirectCompute 5.0OpenCL 3.0
GAME TEST BENCH
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares RX 560 4GB and RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
RX 560 4GBRX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled
Verified H2HCommunity VerifiedEstimatedPredicted
Black Myth: Wukong
1080p High
20 FPSEstimated 64%
28 FPSEstimated 66%
1080p Ultra
16 FPSEstimated 64%
23 FPSEstimated 66%
1440p Ultra
9 FPSEstimated 58%
18 FPSEstimated 66%
4K Ultra
5 FPSEstimated 55%
10 FPSEstimated 66%
Black Myth: WukongRX 560 4GB20 FPSEstimated 64%RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled28 FPSEstimated 66%RX 560 4GB16 FPSEstimated 64%RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled23 FPSEstimated 66%RX 560 4GB9 FPSEstimated 58%RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled18 FPSEstimated 66%RX 560 4GB5 FPSEstimated 55%RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled10 FPSEstimated 66%
Call of Duty: WarzoneRX 560 4GB20 FPSEstimated 64%RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled28 FPSEstimated 66%RX 560 4GB16 FPSEstimated 64%RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled23 FPSEstimated 66%RX 560 4GB9 FPSEstimated 58%RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled18 FPSEstimated 66%RX 560 4GB5 FPSEstimated 55%RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled10 FPSEstimated 66%
Counter-Strike 2RX 560 4GB165 FPSEstimated 72%RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled232 FPSEstimated 74%RX 560 4GB114 FPSEstimated 72%RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled163 FPSEstimated 74%RX 560 4GB63 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled127 FPSEstimated 74%RX 560 4GB22 FPSEstimated 62%RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled63 FPSEstimated 74%
Cyberpunk 2077RX 560 4GB107 FPSEstimated 72%RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled150 FPSEstimated 74%RX 560 4GB90 FPSEstimated 72%RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled129 FPSEstimated 74%RX 560 4GB46 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled92 FPSEstimated 74%RX 560 4GB15 FPSEstimated 62%RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled42 FPSEstimated 74%
Forza Horizon 5RX 560 4GB135 FPSEstimated 78%RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled189 FPSEstimated 80%RX 560 4GB86 FPSEstimated 72%RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled122 FPSEstimated 74%RX 560 4GB57 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled114 FPSEstimated 74%RX 560 4GB32 FPSEstimated 62%RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled93 FPSEstimated 74%
God of War RagnarökRX 560 4GB20 FPSEstimated 64%RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled28 FPSEstimated 66%RX 560 4GB16 FPSEstimated 64%RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled23 FPSEstimated 66%RX 560 4GB9 FPSEstimated 58%RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled18 FPSEstimated 66%RX 560 4GB5 FPSEstimated 55%RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled10 FPSEstimated 66%
Hogwarts LegacyRX 560 4GB87 FPSEstimated 72%RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled122 FPSEstimated 74%RX 560 4GB72 FPSEstimated 72%RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled102 FPSEstimated 74%RX 560 4GB41 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled82 FPSEstimated 74%RX 560 4GB15 FPSEstimated 62%RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled43 FPSEstimated 74%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024RX 560 4GB20 FPSEstimated 64%RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled28 FPSEstimated 66%RX 560 4GB16 FPSEstimated 64%RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled23 FPSEstimated 66%RX 560 4GB9 FPSEstimated 58%RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled18 FPSEstimated 66%RX 560 4GB5 FPSEstimated 55%RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled10 FPSEstimated 66%
Monster Hunter WildsRX 560 4GB20 FPSEstimated 64%RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled28 FPSEstimated 66%RX 560 4GB16 FPSEstimated 64%RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled23 FPSEstimated 66%RX 560 4GB9 FPSEstimated 58%RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled18 FPSEstimated 66%RX 560 4GB5 FPSEstimated 55%RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled10 FPSEstimated 66%
StarfieldRX 560 4GB20 FPSEstimated 64%RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled28 FPSEstimated 66%RX 560 4GB16 FPSEstimated 64%RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled23 FPSEstimated 66%RX 560 4GB9 FPSEstimated 58%RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled18 FPSEstimated 66%RX 560 4GB5 FPSEstimated 55%RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled10 FPSEstimated 66%
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
The Benchmarks section compares RX 560 4GB and RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100335652%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100386552%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100396550%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100568844%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001005361%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
The Detailed comparison section compares RX 560 4GB and RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100437048%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100426949%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100396550%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100457449%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100406649%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
The Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling section compares RX 560 4GB and RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
DirectX12.012.2
Vulkan1.21.2
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingNot supportedFSR
Compute APIOpenCL 2.0 / DirectCompute 5.0OpenCL 3.0
Architecture and release
The Architecture and release section compares RX 560 4GB and RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
ArchitecturePolarisNot publicly specified
Process node14 nm7 nmBetter
Release date20172021
Device classDesktopDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
The Core layout and clocks section compares RX 560 4GB and RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
Transistor count3000 millionNot publicly specified
Die size123 mm²Not publicly specified
Shader units / cores896Not publicly specified
Base clock1175 MHz2050 MHzBetter
Boost clock1275 MHz2435 MHzBetter
Board size, power and compatibility
The Form factor and compatibility section compares RX 560 4GB and RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
InterfacePCIe 3x8PCIe 4x16
LengthVaries by boardVaries by board
ThicknessVaries by boardVaries by board
Recommended PSUVaries by boardVaries by board
Power connector6 pin8+8 pin
Display outputs and limits
The Display outputs section compares RX 560 4GB and RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
HDMIHDMI 2.0bHDMI 2.1
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4DisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitorsVaries by board4
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320
Memory and compute throughput
The VRAM capacity and bandwidth section compares RX 560 4GB and RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
VRAM4 GB GDDR516 GB GDDR6Better
Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Memory bus128 bit256 bitBetter
TFLOPS2.61123.04Better
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Other comparisons
Arc A310Intel
GTX 1050 3GBNVIDIAReviews and questions
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: RX 560 4GB or RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled?+
RX 560 4GB has the higher overall gaming score, while RX 560 4GB offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
RX 560 4GB is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
RX 560 4GB is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
RX 560 4GB offers more overall performance, while RX 560 4GB offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RX 560 4GB is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
RX 560 4GB is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
RX 560 4GB leads in combined 1440p performance. RX 560 4GB can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RX 560 4GB is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
RX 560 4GB is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
RX 560 4GB is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to RX 560 4GB if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.