AMD
Radeon RX 570 4GB vs Radeon RX 590
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
AMD
RX 590
Aggregate performance score
We've compared RX 570 4GB and RX 590 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗RX 590 outperforms RX 570 4GB by 11% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+11%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.Radeon RX 570 4GB vs Radeon RX 590: key takeaway
The comparison of RX 570 4GB and RX 590 shows a 11% advantage for RX 590 in gaming performance, while RX 570 4GB may still be stronger in value for money. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMDPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
3741
8261
100100
5668
COMPARISON RESULT
RX 570 4GB is the best overall choice
RX 570 4GB leads in combined game performance. RX 570 4GB offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
RX 570 4GB leads in the combined performance index
RX 570 4GB costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 221–226of 317
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon RX 590
101 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Radeon RX 570 4GB
100/100 · Price $239The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
OVERALL SCORE
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
The Summary score section compares RX 570 4GB and RX 590 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
37
41Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
33
36Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
31
34Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
82Better
61
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
58Better
56
FULL COMPARISON
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
The Specifications section compares RX 570 4GB and RX 590 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
Device classDesktopDesktop
DirectX12.012.0
Vulkan1.21.3
OpenGL4.64.6
HDMIHDMI 2.0bHDMI 2.0b
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4DisplayPort 1.4a
Max monitorsVaries by board4
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320
USB Type-CNoNo
Recommended PSUVaries by board450 W
LengthVaries by board241 mm
ThicknessVaries by boardDual-slot
TFLOPS5.0957.119Better
Power consumption150 WBetter225 W
Release date20172018
Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Power connector8 pin8 pin
Upscaling——
Compute API—OpenCL 2.1
Launch price—$309
Clock speed1168 - 1244 MHz1469 - 1545 MHzBetter
Base clock1168 MHz1469 MHzBetter
Boost clock1244 MHz1545 MHzBetter
VRAM4 GB GDDR58 GB GDDR5Better
Memory frequency7 GHz8 GHzBetter
Memory bus256 bit256 bit
Memory bandwidth224 GB/s256 GB/sBetter
InterfacePCIe 3x16PCIe 3x16
Power consumption150 WBetter225 W
Process node14 nm12 nmBetter
ArchitecturePolarisGCN 4.0
Transistor count5700 million5700 million
Die size232 mm²232 mm²
Shader units / cores20482304Better
Memory cacheL1 16 KB, L2 2 MBL1 16 KB, L2 2 MB
GAME TEST BENCH
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares RX 570 4GB and RX 590 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
RX 570 4GBRX 590
Verified H2HCommunity VerifiedEstimatedPredicted
Black Myth: Wukong
1080p High
22 FPSEstimated 66%
23 FPSEstimated 66%
1080p Ultra
19 FPSEstimated 66%
19 FPSEstimated 66%
1440p Ultra
10 FPSEstimated 60%
13 FPSEstimated 64%
4K Ultra
5 FPSEstimated 55%
5 FPSEstimated 57%
Black Myth: WukongRX 570 4GB22 FPSEstimated 66%RX 59023 FPSEstimated 66%RX 570 4GB19 FPSEstimated 66%RX 59019 FPSEstimated 66%RX 570 4GB10 FPSEstimated 60%RX 59013 FPSEstimated 64%RX 570 4GB5 FPSEstimated 55%RX 5905 FPSEstimated 57%
Call of Duty: WarzoneRX 570 4GB22 FPSEstimated 66%RX 59023 FPSEstimated 66%RX 570 4GB19 FPSEstimated 66%RX 59019 FPSEstimated 66%RX 570 4GB10 FPSEstimated 60%RX 59013 FPSEstimated 64%RX 570 4GB5 FPSEstimated 55%RX 5905 FPSEstimated 57%
Counter-Strike 2RX 570 4GB185 FPSEstimated 74%RX 590191 FPSEstimated 74%RX 570 4GB130 FPSEstimated 74%RX 590134 FPSEstimated 74%RX 570 4GB73 FPSEstimated 68%RX 59097 FPSEstimated 72%RX 570 4GB25 FPSEstimated 63%RX 59032 FPSEstimated 65%
Cyberpunk 2077RX 570 4GB120 FPSEstimated 74%RX 590123 FPSEstimated 74%RX 570 4GB103 FPSEstimated 74%RX 590106 FPSEstimated 74%RX 570 4GB53 FPSEstimated 68%RX 59070 FPSEstimated 72%RX 570 4GB17 FPSEstimated 63%RX 59021 FPSEstimated 65%
Forza Horizon 5RX 570 4GB151 FPSEstimated 80%RX 590155 FPSEstimated 80%RX 570 4GB98 FPSEstimated 74%RX 590101 FPSEstimated 74%RX 570 4GB65 FPSEstimated 68%RX 59087 FPSEstimated 72%RX 570 4GB36 FPSEstimated 63%RX 59046 FPSEstimated 65%
God of War RagnarökRX 570 4GB22 FPSEstimated 66%RX 59023 FPSEstimated 66%RX 570 4GB19 FPSEstimated 66%RX 59019 FPSEstimated 66%RX 570 4GB10 FPSEstimated 60%RX 59013 FPSEstimated 64%RX 570 4GB5 FPSEstimated 55%RX 5905 FPSEstimated 57%
Hogwarts LegacyRX 570 4GB98 FPSEstimated 74%RX 590101 FPSEstimated 74%RX 570 4GB82 FPSEstimated 74%RX 59084 FPSEstimated 74%RX 570 4GB47 FPSEstimated 68%RX 59063 FPSEstimated 72%RX 570 4GB17 FPSEstimated 63%RX 59022 FPSEstimated 65%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024RX 570 4GB22 FPSEstimated 66%RX 59023 FPSEstimated 66%RX 570 4GB19 FPSEstimated 66%RX 59019 FPSEstimated 66%RX 570 4GB10 FPSEstimated 60%RX 59013 FPSEstimated 64%RX 570 4GB5 FPSEstimated 55%RX 5905 FPSEstimated 57%
Monster Hunter WildsRX 570 4GB22 FPSEstimated 66%RX 59023 FPSEstimated 66%RX 570 4GB19 FPSEstimated 66%RX 59019 FPSEstimated 66%RX 570 4GB10 FPSEstimated 60%RX 59013 FPSEstimated 64%RX 570 4GB5 FPSEstimated 55%RX 5905 FPSEstimated 57%
StarfieldRX 570 4GB22 FPSEstimated 66%RX 59023 FPSEstimated 66%RX 570 4GB19 FPSEstimated 66%RX 59019 FPSEstimated 66%RX 570 4GB10 FPSEstimated 60%RX 59013 FPSEstimated 64%RX 570 4GB5 FPSEstimated 55%RX 5905 FPSEstimated 57%
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
The Benchmarks section compares RX 570 4GB and RX 590 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100374110%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100404716%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100424915%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100566819%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 100826129%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
The Detailed comparison section compares RX 570 4GB and RX 590 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100455316%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100445217%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100424915%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100475617%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100434913%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
The Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling section compares RX 570 4GB and RX 590 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
DirectX12.012.0
Vulkan1.21.3
OpenGL4.64.6
Upscaling——
Compute API—OpenCL 2.1
Architecture and release
The Architecture and release section compares RX 570 4GB and RX 590 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
ArchitecturePolarisGCN 4.0
Process node14 nm12 nmBetter
Release date20172018
Device classDesktopDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
The Core layout and clocks section compares RX 570 4GB and RX 590 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
Transistor count5700 million5700 million
Die size232 mm²232 mm²
Shader units / cores20482304Better
Base clock1168 MHz1469 MHzBetter
Boost clock1244 MHz1545 MHzBetter
Board size, power and compatibility
The Form factor and compatibility section compares RX 570 4GB and RX 590 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
InterfacePCIe 3x16PCIe 3x16
LengthVaries by board241 mm
ThicknessVaries by boardDual-slot
Recommended PSUVaries by board450 W
Power connector8 pin8 pin
Display outputs and limits
The Display outputs section compares RX 570 4GB and RX 590 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
HDMIHDMI 2.0bHDMI 2.0b
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4DisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitorsVaries by board4
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320
Memory and compute throughput
The VRAM capacity and bandwidth section compares RX 570 4GB and RX 590 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
VRAM4 GB GDDR58 GB GDDR5Better
Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Memory bus256 bit256 bit
TFLOPS5.0957.119Better
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Other comparisons
Arc A310Intel
GTX 1050 3GBNVIDIAReviews and questions
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: RX 570 4GB or RX 590?+
RX 570 4GB has the higher overall gaming score, while RX 570 4GB offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
RX 570 4GB is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
RX 570 4GB is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
RX 570 4GB offers more overall performance, while RX 570 4GB offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RX 570 4GB is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
RX 570 4GB is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
RX 570 4GB leads in combined 1440p performance. RX 570 4GB can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RX 570 4GB is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
RX 570 4GB is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
RX 570 4GB is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to RX 570 4GB if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.