AMD
Radeon RX 5700 vs GeForce MX250
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
NVIDIA
GeForce MX250
Aggregate performance score
We've compared RX 5700 and GeForce MX250 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗RX 5700 outperforms GeForce MX250 by ~45% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+45%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: Radeon RX 5700 (~21%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider RX 5700
- Higher catalog performance index
- More graphics memory
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 2.1 · FSR
Reasons to consider GeForce MX250
- Lower stated power consumption
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 6.1 · NVIDIA Image Scaling (NIS)
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMD
NVIDIAPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
4531
83100
6854
6856
Graphics card ranking
Positions 72–77of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon RX 5700
176 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
45Better
31
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
39Better
29
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
36Better
26
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
83
100Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
52Better
43
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
DisplayPort
HDMI
Device class
Upscaling
Max resolution
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Memory type
Power connector
Release date
Architecture
Thickness
Compute API
Launch price—
Shader units / coresBetter
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAMBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory busBetter
Memory bandwidthBetter
Interface
Power consumptionBetter
Process nodeBetter
Recommended PSU
Length
Die sizeBetter
Memory cacheBetter
Transistor countBetter
Max monitors
USB Type-C
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares RX 5700 and GeForce MX250 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
RX 5700GeForce MX250
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
196 FPS
157 FPS
1080p Ultra
138 FPS
110 FPS
1440p Ultra
107 FPS
59 FPS
4K Ultra
40 FPS
21 FPS
Counter-Strike 2RX 5700196 FPSGeForce MX250157 FPSRX 5700138 FPSGeForce MX250110 FPSRX 5700107 FPSGeForce MX25059 FPSRX 570040 FPSGeForce MX25021 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077RX 5700126 FPSGeForce MX250101 FPSRX 5700109 FPSGeForce MX25087 FPSRX 570078 FPSGeForce MX25043 FPSRX 570027 FPSGeForce MX25014 FPS
Forza Horizon 5RX 5700159 FPSGeForce MX250128 FPSRX 5700103 FPSGeForce MX25083 FPSRX 570096 FPSGeForce MX25053 FPSRX 570058 FPSGeForce MX25031 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyRX 5700103 FPSGeForce MX25083 FPSRX 570086 FPSGeForce MX25069 FPSRX 570069 FPSGeForce MX25038 FPSRX 570027 FPSGeForce MX25015 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100453137%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100503827%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100523831%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100685619%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1008310019%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100554227%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100544127%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100523831%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100584525%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100523831%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12.112.1
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingFSRNVIDIA Image Scaling (NIS)
Compute APIOpenCL 2.1OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 6.1
Architecture and release
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0Pascal / Turing / Ampere
Process node7 nmBetter14 nm
Release date20192019
Device classDesktopMobile
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count10300 millionBetter1800 million
Die size251 mm²74 mm²Better
Shader units / cores2304Better384
Base clock1465 MHz1519 MHzBetter
Boost clock1625 MHzBetter1582 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 4x16PCIe 3.0 x4
Length268 mmOEM dependent
ThicknessDual-slotIGP
Recommended PSU450 WOEM dependent
Power connector6+8 pinNone
Display outputs and limits
HDMIHDMI 2.0bOEM dependent
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4aOEM dependent
USB Type-CNoOEM dependent
Max monitors4OEM dependent
Max resolution7680 × 4320Depends on host system
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM8 GB GDDR6Better2 GB GDDR5
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5 / GDDR6
Memory bus256 bitBetter64 bit
TFLOPS7.949Better1.215
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 69
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (3)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (4)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record changed: product_prices
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: RX 5700 or GeForce MX250?+
RX 5700 has the higher overall gaming score, while RX 5700 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
GeForce MX250 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
GeForce MX250 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
RX 5700 offers more overall performance, while RX 5700 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
GeForce MX250 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
RX 5700 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
RX 5700 leads in combined 1440p performance. RX 5700 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RX 5700 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
GeForce MX250 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
GeForce MX250 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to RX 5700 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.