H2H

Radeon RX 6400 vs Radeon Vega II 8CU 4700G

Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RX 6400 and Vega II 8CU 4700G across specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Vega II 8CU 4700G outperforms RX 6400 by 36% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+36%

Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.
QUICK COMPARISON ANALYSIS

Radeon RX 6400 vs Radeon Vega II 8CU 4700G: key takeaway

The comparison of RX 6400 and Vega II 8CU 4700G shows a 36% advantage for Vega II 8CU 4700G in gaming performance, while RX 6400 may still be stronger in value for money. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.

SUMMARY PROFILE

Verified-metrics radar

Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.

H2H
Performance
Price / performance
Performance
3345
Price / performance
100100
Missing values are never replaced with zero or an average.Model: H2H 2026.07 fixed scale.
COMPARISON RESULT

The devices received the same overall score

RX 6400 leads in combined game performance. RX 6400 offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.

PERFORMANCE DIFFERENCE0%

Performance is nearly identical

PRICE DIFFERENCE$75

RX 6400 costs less

CATALOG POSITION

Graphics card ranking

Full ranking →

The ranking is recalculated automatically from catalog data.

Positions 160–165of 317
RX 6400not in TOP100position in the GPU ranking
Vega II 8CU 4700Gnot in TOP100position in the GPU ranking
COMPARISON VERDICT

Which should you choose?

Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.

COMMUNITY CHOICE

Radeon Vega II 8CU 4700G

158 likes

Head to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.

$/FPSBEST PRICE / FPS

Radeon RX 6400

100/100 · Price $159

The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.

OVERALL SCORE

Overview

Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.

The Summary score section compares RX 6400 and Vega II 8CU 4700G with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

CategoryRX 6400Vega II 8CU 4700G
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
33
45Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
30
39Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
28
36Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
51
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
58
58
FULL COMPARISON

Specifications

The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.

The Specifications section compares RX 6400 and Vega II 8CU 4700G with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationRX 6400Vega II 8CU 4700G
HDMIHDMI 2.1HDMI 2.1
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4aDisplayPort 1.4a
Device classDesktopDesktop
Max monitors24
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320
USB Type-CNoNo
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.2
OpenGL4.64.6
TFLOPS3.565Better2.1
Power consumption53 W
Memory typeGDDR6SMA
Power connectorNone
Release date20222020
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0Not publicly specified
ThicknessSingle-slotVaries by board
Compute APIOpenCL 2.2OpenCL 3.0
Launch price$159
Shader units / cores768Not publicly specified
Clock speed1923 - 2321 MHzBetter400 - 2100 MHz
Base clock1923 MHzBetter400 MHz
Boost clock2321 MHzBetter2100 MHz
VRAM4 GB GDDR6- SMA
Memory frequency16 GHz
Memory bus64 bit
Memory bandwidth128 GB/s
InterfacePCIe 4x4IGP
Power consumption53 W
Process node6 nmBetter7 nm
Recommended PSU250 WVaries by board
Die size107 mm²Not publicly specified
Memory cacheL1 128 KB, L2 1 MBNot publicly specified
Transistor count5400 millionNot publicly specified
UpscalingFSRFSR
LengthVaries by boardVaries by board
GAME TEST BENCH

Gaming FPS

Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.

The Gaming FPS section compares RX 6400 and Vega II 8CU 4700G across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.

RX 6400Vega II 8CU 4700G
Verified H2HCommunity VerifiedEstimatedPredicted
Black Myth: Wukong

Black Myth: Wukong

1080p High
20 FPSEstimated 64%
22 FPSEstimated 66%
1080p Ultra
17 FPSEstimated 64%
19 FPSEstimated 66%
1440p Ultra
9 FPSEstimated 58%
14 FPSEstimated 66%
4K Ultra
5 FPSEstimated 55%
8 FPSEstimated 66%
Game1080p High1080p Ultra1440p Ultra4K Ultra
Black Myth: WukongRX 640020 FPSEstimated 64%Vega II 8CU 4700G22 FPSEstimated 66%RX 640017 FPSEstimated 64%Vega II 8CU 4700G19 FPSEstimated 66%RX 64009 FPSEstimated 58%Vega II 8CU 4700G14 FPSEstimated 66%RX 64005 FPSEstimated 55%Vega II 8CU 4700G8 FPSEstimated 66%
Call of Duty: WarzoneRX 640020 FPSEstimated 64%Vega II 8CU 4700G22 FPSEstimated 66%RX 640017 FPSEstimated 64%Vega II 8CU 4700G19 FPSEstimated 66%RX 64009 FPSEstimated 58%Vega II 8CU 4700G14 FPSEstimated 66%RX 64005 FPSEstimated 55%Vega II 8CU 4700G8 FPSEstimated 66%
Counter-Strike 2RX 6400168 FPSEstimated 72%Vega II 8CU 4700G185 FPSEstimated 74%RX 6400118 FPSEstimated 72%Vega II 8CU 4700G130 FPSEstimated 74%RX 640063 FPSEstimated 66%Vega II 8CU 4700G101 FPSEstimated 74%RX 640023 FPSEstimated 62%Vega II 8CU 4700G50 FPSEstimated 74%
Cyberpunk 2077RX 6400109 FPSEstimated 72%Vega II 8CU 4700G119 FPSEstimated 74%RX 640093 FPSEstimated 72%Vega II 8CU 4700G103 FPSEstimated 74%RX 640046 FPSEstimated 66%Vega II 8CU 4700G73 FPSEstimated 74%RX 640015 FPSEstimated 62%Vega II 8CU 4700G34 FPSEstimated 74%
Forza Horizon 5RX 6400137 FPSEstimated 78%Vega II 8CU 4700G150 FPSEstimated 80%RX 640088 FPSEstimated 72%Vega II 8CU 4700G97 FPSEstimated 74%RX 640057 FPSEstimated 66%Vega II 8CU 4700G91 FPSEstimated 74%RX 640033 FPSEstimated 62%Vega II 8CU 4700G74 FPSEstimated 74%
God of War RagnarökRX 640020 FPSEstimated 64%Vega II 8CU 4700G22 FPSEstimated 66%RX 640017 FPSEstimated 64%Vega II 8CU 4700G19 FPSEstimated 66%RX 64009 FPSEstimated 58%Vega II 8CU 4700G14 FPSEstimated 66%RX 64005 FPSEstimated 55%Vega II 8CU 4700G8 FPSEstimated 66%
Hogwarts LegacyRX 640089 FPSEstimated 72%Vega II 8CU 4700G97 FPSEstimated 74%RX 640074 FPSEstimated 72%Vega II 8CU 4700G81 FPSEstimated 74%RX 640041 FPSEstimated 66%Vega II 8CU 4700G65 FPSEstimated 74%RX 640016 FPSEstimated 62%Vega II 8CU 4700G34 FPSEstimated 74%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024RX 640020 FPSEstimated 64%Vega II 8CU 4700G22 FPSEstimated 66%RX 640017 FPSEstimated 64%Vega II 8CU 4700G19 FPSEstimated 66%RX 64009 FPSEstimated 58%Vega II 8CU 4700G14 FPSEstimated 66%RX 64005 FPSEstimated 55%Vega II 8CU 4700G8 FPSEstimated 66%
Monster Hunter WildsRX 640020 FPSEstimated 64%Vega II 8CU 4700G22 FPSEstimated 66%RX 640017 FPSEstimated 64%Vega II 8CU 4700G19 FPSEstimated 66%RX 64009 FPSEstimated 58%Vega II 8CU 4700G14 FPSEstimated 66%RX 64005 FPSEstimated 55%Vega II 8CU 4700G8 FPSEstimated 66%
StarfieldRX 640020 FPSEstimated 64%Vega II 8CU 4700G22 FPSEstimated 66%RX 640017 FPSEstimated 64%Vega II 8CU 4700G19 FPSEstimated 66%RX 64009 FPSEstimated 58%Vega II 8CU 4700G14 FPSEstimated 66%RX 64005 FPSEstimated 55%Vega II 8CU 4700G8 FPSEstimated 66%
Average FPSRX 640062 FPSVega II 8CU 4700G68 FPSRX 640048 FPSVega II 8CU 4700G53 FPSRX 640026 FPSVega II 8CU 4700G41 FPSRX 640012 FPSVega II 8CU 4700G24 FPS
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H workload indices

Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.

The Benchmarks section compares RX 6400 and Vega II 8CU 4700G with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

IndexRX 6400Vega II 8CU 4700GDifference
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100334531%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100444911%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10041459%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100600200%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001000200%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H AI workload indices

Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.

The Detailed comparison section compares RX 6400 and Vega II 8CU 4700G with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

IndexRX 6400Vega II 8CU 4700GDifference
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10045450%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10044452%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10041459%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 10048456%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10041459%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling

The Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling section compares RX 6400 and Vega II 8CU 4700G with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRX 6400Vega II 8CU 4700G
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.2
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingFSRFSR
Compute APIOpenCL 2.2OpenCL 3.0

Architecture and release

The Architecture and release section compares RX 6400 and Vega II 8CU 4700G with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRX 6400Vega II 8CU 4700G
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0Not publicly specified
Process node6 nmBetter7 nm
Release date20222020
Device classDesktopDesktop

GPU cores, die and clocks

The Core layout and clocks section compares RX 6400 and Vega II 8CU 4700G with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRX 6400Vega II 8CU 4700G
Transistor count5400 millionNot publicly specified
Die size107 mm²Not publicly specified
Shader units / cores768Not publicly specified
Base clock1923 MHzBetter400 MHz
Boost clock2321 MHzBetter2100 MHz

Board size, power and compatibility

The Form factor and compatibility section compares RX 6400 and Vega II 8CU 4700G with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRX 6400Vega II 8CU 4700G
InterfacePCIe 4x4IGP
LengthVaries by boardVaries by board
ThicknessSingle-slotVaries by board
Recommended PSU250 WVaries by board
Power connectorNone

Display outputs and limits

The Display outputs section compares RX 6400 and Vega II 8CU 4700G with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRX 6400Vega II 8CU 4700G
HDMIHDMI 2.1HDMI 2.1
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4aDisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitors24
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320

Memory and compute throughput

The VRAM capacity and bandwidth section compares RX 6400 and Vega II 8CU 4700G with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRX 6400Vega II 8CU 4700G
VRAM4 GB GDDR6- SMA
Memory typeGDDR6SMA
Memory bus64 bit
TFLOPS3.565Better2.1
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER

Other comparisons

6

Reviews and questions

AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD

Explain this comparison

Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.

Device ARX 640058
Device BVega II 8CU 4700G58
What AI will explain

Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.

REAL CONFIGURATIONS

Owner experiences

Real builds, results, and community feedback.

Moderator reviewedHelpful to the community🏅Expert badges
FAQ · CHOOSE BY USE CASE

Frequently asked comparison questions

Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.

01Which is better for gaming: RX 6400 or Vega II 8CU 4700G?

RX 6400 has the higher overall gaming score, while RX 6400 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.

02Which is better for streaming?

RX 6400 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.

03Which is better for Blender?

RX 6400 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.

04Which is better for video editing?

RX 6400 offers more overall performance, while RX 6400 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.

05Which is better for neural networks and AI?

RX 6400 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.

06Which is better for 1080p?

RX 6400 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.

07Which is better for 1440p?

RX 6400 leads in combined 1440p performance. RX 6400 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.

08Which is better for 4K?

RX 6400 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.

09Which is better for a quiet PC?

RX 6400 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.

10Which is better without replacing the power supply?

RX 6400 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.

11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?

Consider upgrading to RX 6400 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.