H2H

Radeon RX 6700 XT vs GeForce GTX 1660

Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RX 6700 XT and GTX 1660 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 6700 XT outperforms GTX 1660 by 32% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+32%

Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.
QUICK COMPARISON ANALYSIS

Radeon RX 6700 XT vs GeForce GTX 1660: key takeaway

The comparison of RX 6700 XT and GTX 1660 shows a 32% advantage for RX 6700 XT in gaming performance, while GTX 1660 may still be stronger in efficiency and feature set. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.

SUMMARY PROFILE

Verified-metrics radar

Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.

H2H
Performance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
Performance
5038
Efficiency
72100
Price / performance
100100
Memory capacity
8060
Missing values are never replaced with zero or an average.Model: H2H 2026.07 fixed scale.
COMPARISON RESULT

RX 6700 XT is the best overall choice

RX 6700 XT leads in combined game performance. RX 6700 XT offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.

PERFORMANCE DIFFERENCE3%

RX 6700 XT leads in the combined performance index

PRICE DIFFERENCE$175

GTX 1660 costs less

CATALOG POSITION

Graphics card ranking

Full ranking →

The ranking is recalculated automatically from catalog data.

Positions 67–72of 317
RX 6700 XT#69position in the GPU ranking
GTX 1660not in TOP100position in the GPU ranking
COMPARISON VERDICT

Which should you choose?

Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.

COMMUNITY CHOICE

Radeon RX 6700 XT

97 likes

Head to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.

$/FPSBEST PRICE / FPS

GeForce GTX 1660

100/100 · Price $229

The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.

OVERALL SCORE

Overview

Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.

The Summary score section compares RX 6700 XT and GTX 1660 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

CategoryRX 6700 XTGTX 1660
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
50Better
38
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
42Better
34
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
40Better
31
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
72
100Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
64Better
62
FULL COMPARISON

Specifications

The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.

The Specifications section compares RX 6700 XT and GTX 1660 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationRX 6700 XTGTX 1660
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4aDisplayPort 1.4a
HDMIHDMI 2.1HDMI 2.0
Device classDesktopDesktop
UpscalingFSR
USB Type-CNoNo
DirectX12.212.1
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
TFLOPS13.21Better5.027
Power consumption230 W120 WBetter
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Power connector6+8 pin8 pin
Release date20212019
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0Turing
ThicknessDual-slotDual-slot
Compute APIOpenCL 2.1OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 7.5
Launch price$479$229Better
Shader units / cores2560Better1408
Clock speed2321 - 2581 MHzBetter1530 - 1785 MHz
Base clock2321 MHzBetter1530 MHz
Boost clock2581 MHzBetter1785 MHz
VRAM12 GB GDDR6Better6 GB GDDR5
Memory frequency16 GHzBetter8 GHz
Memory bus192 bit192 bit
Memory bandwidth384 GB/sBetter192 GB/s
InterfacePCIe 4x16PCIe 3x16
Power consumption230 W120 WBetter
Process node7 nmBetter12 nm
Recommended PSU550 W300 WBetter
Length267 mm229 mmBetter
Die size335 mm²284 mm²Better
Memory cacheL1 128 KB, L2 3 MBL1 64 KB, L2 1.5 MB
Transistor count17200 millionBetter6600 million
Max monitors43
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320
GAME TEST BENCH

Gaming FPS

Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.

The Gaming FPS section compares RX 6700 XT and GTX 1660 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.

RX 6700 XTGTX 1660
Verified H2HCommunity VerifiedEstimatedPredicted
Black Myth: Wukong

Black Myth: Wukong

1080p High
25 FPSEstimated 66%
22 FPSEstimated 66%
1080p Ultra
21 FPSEstimated 66%
19 FPSEstimated 66%
1440p Ultra
16 FPSEstimated 66%
11 FPSEstimated 60%
4K Ultra
8 FPSEstimated 63%
5 FPSEstimated 55%
Game1080p High1080p Ultra1440p Ultra4K Ultra
Black Myth: WukongRX 6700 XT25 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 166022 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6700 XT21 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 166019 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6700 XT16 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 166011 FPSEstimated 60%RX 6700 XT8 FPSEstimated 63%GTX 16605 FPSEstimated 55%
Call of Duty: WarzoneRX 6700 XT25 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 166022 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6700 XT21 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 166019 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6700 XT16 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 166011 FPSEstimated 60%RX 6700 XT8 FPSEstimated 63%GTX 16605 FPSEstimated 55%
Counter-Strike 2RX 6700 XT212 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 1660189 FPSEstimated 74%RX 6700 XT149 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 1660133 FPSEstimated 74%RX 6700 XT116 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 166077 FPSEstimated 68%RX 6700 XT49 FPSEstimated 71%GTX 166024 FPSEstimated 62%
Cyberpunk 2077RX 6700 XT137 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 1660122 FPSEstimated 74%RX 6700 XT118 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 1660105 FPSEstimated 74%RX 6700 XT84 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 166056 FPSEstimated 68%RX 6700 XT33 FPSEstimated 71%GTX 166016 FPSEstimated 62%
Forza Horizon 5RX 6700 XT172 FPSEstimated 80%GTX 1660154 FPSEstimated 80%RX 6700 XT112 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 166099 FPSEstimated 74%RX 6700 XT104 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 166069 FPSEstimated 68%RX 6700 XT73 FPSEstimated 71%GTX 166036 FPSEstimated 62%
God of War RagnarökRX 6700 XT25 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 166022 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6700 XT21 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 166019 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6700 XT16 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 166011 FPSEstimated 60%RX 6700 XT8 FPSEstimated 63%GTX 16605 FPSEstimated 55%
Hogwarts LegacyRX 6700 XT112 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 166099 FPSEstimated 74%RX 6700 XT93 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 166083 FPSEstimated 74%RX 6700 XT75 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 166050 FPSEstimated 68%RX 6700 XT34 FPSEstimated 71%GTX 166017 FPSEstimated 62%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024RX 6700 XT25 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 166022 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6700 XT21 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 166019 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6700 XT16 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 166011 FPSEstimated 60%RX 6700 XT8 FPSEstimated 63%GTX 16605 FPSEstimated 55%
Monster Hunter WildsRX 6700 XT25 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 166022 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6700 XT21 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 166019 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6700 XT16 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 166011 FPSEstimated 60%RX 6700 XT8 FPSEstimated 63%GTX 16605 FPSEstimated 55%
StarfieldRX 6700 XT25 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 166022 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6700 XT21 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 166019 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6700 XT16 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 166011 FPSEstimated 60%RX 6700 XT8 FPSEstimated 63%GTX 16605 FPSEstimated 55%
Average FPSRX 6700 XT78 FPSGTX 166070 FPSRX 6700 XT60 FPSGTX 166053 FPSRX 6700 XT48 FPSGTX 166032 FPSRX 6700 XT24 FPSGTX 166012 FPS
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H workload indices

Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.

The Benchmarks section compares RX 6700 XT and GTX 1660 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

IndexRX 6700 XTGTX 1660Difference
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100503827%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100604529%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100584427%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100806029%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1007210033%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H AI workload indices

Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.

The Detailed comparison section compares RX 6700 XT and GTX 1660 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

IndexRX 6700 XTGTX 1660Difference
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100634827%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100624728%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100584427%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100665028%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100594527%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling

The Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling section compares RX 6700 XT and GTX 1660 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRX 6700 XTGTX 1660
DirectX12.212.1
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingFSR
Compute APIOpenCL 2.1OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 7.5

Architecture and release

The Architecture and release section compares RX 6700 XT and GTX 1660 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRX 6700 XTGTX 1660
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0Turing
Process node7 nmBetter12 nm
Release date20212019
Device classDesktopDesktop

GPU cores, die and clocks

The Core layout and clocks section compares RX 6700 XT and GTX 1660 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRX 6700 XTGTX 1660
Transistor count17200 millionBetter6600 million
Die size335 mm²284 mm²Better
Shader units / cores2560Better1408
Base clock2321 MHzBetter1530 MHz
Boost clock2581 MHzBetter1785 MHz

Board size, power and compatibility

The Form factor and compatibility section compares RX 6700 XT and GTX 1660 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRX 6700 XTGTX 1660
InterfacePCIe 4x16PCIe 3x16
Length267 mm229 mmBetter
ThicknessDual-slotDual-slot
Recommended PSU550 W300 WBetter
Power connector6+8 pin8 pin

Display outputs and limits

The Display outputs section compares RX 6700 XT and GTX 1660 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRX 6700 XTGTX 1660
HDMIHDMI 2.1HDMI 2.0
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4aDisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitors43
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320

Memory and compute throughput

The VRAM capacity and bandwidth section compares RX 6700 XT and GTX 1660 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRX 6700 XTGTX 1660
VRAM12 GB GDDR6Better6 GB GDDR5
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Memory bus192 bit192 bit
TFLOPS13.21Better5.027
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER

Other comparisons

6

Reviews and questions

AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD

Explain this comparison

Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.

Device ARX 6700 XT64
Device BGTX 166062
What AI will explain

Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.

REAL CONFIGURATIONS

Owner experiences

Real builds, results, and community feedback.

Moderator reviewedHelpful to the community🏅Expert badges
FAQ · CHOOSE BY USE CASE

Frequently asked comparison questions

Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.

01Which is better for gaming: RX 6700 XT or GTX 1660?

RX 6700 XT has the higher overall gaming score, while RX 6700 XT offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.

02Which is better for streaming?

GTX 1660 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.

03Which is better for Blender?

GTX 1660 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.

04Which is better for video editing?

RX 6700 XT offers more overall performance, while RX 6700 XT offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.

05Which is better for neural networks and AI?

GTX 1660 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.

06Which is better for 1080p?

RX 6700 XT is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.

07Which is better for 1440p?

RX 6700 XT leads in combined 1440p performance. RX 6700 XT can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.

08Which is better for 4K?

RX 6700 XT is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.

09Which is better for a quiet PC?

GTX 1660 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.

10Which is better without replacing the power supply?

GTX 1660 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.

11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?

Consider upgrading to RX 6700 XT if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.