H2H

Radeon RX 6750 XT vs Intel Arc A380

Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RX 6750 XT and Arc A380 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 6750 XT outperforms Arc A380 by 39% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+39%

Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.
QUICK COMPARISON ANALYSIS

Radeon RX 6750 XT vs Intel Arc A380: key takeaway

The comparison of RX 6750 XT and Arc A380 shows a 39% advantage for RX 6750 XT in gaming performance, while Arc A380 may still be stronger in value for money. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.

SUMMARY PROFILE

Verified-metrics radar

Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.

H2H
Performance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
Performance
5036
Efficiency
67100
Price / performance
91100
Memory capacity
8060
Missing values are never replaced with zero or an average.Model: H2H 2026.07 fixed scale.
COMPARISON RESULT

RX 6750 XT is the best overall choice

RX 6750 XT leads in combined game performance. Arc A380 offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.

PERFORMANCE DIFFERENCE2%

RX 6750 XT leads in the combined performance index

PRICE DIFFERENCE$280

Arc A380 costs less

CATALOG POSITION

Graphics card ranking

Full ranking →

The ranking is recalculated automatically from catalog data.

Positions 115–120of 317
RX 6750 XTnot in TOP100position in the GPU ranking
Arc A380not in TOP100position in the GPU ranking
COMPARISON VERDICT

Which should you choose?

Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.

COMMUNITY CHOICE

Radeon RX 6750 XT

130 likes

Head to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.

$/FPSBEST PRICE / FPS

Intel Arc A380

100/100 · Price $139

The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.

OVERALL SCORE

Overview

Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.

The Summary score section compares RX 6750 XT and Arc A380 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

CategoryRX 6750 XTArc A380
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
50Better
36
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
42Better
32
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
40Better
30
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
67
100Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
61Better
60
FULL COMPARISON

Specifications

The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.

The Specifications section compares RX 6750 XT and Arc A380 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationRX 6750 XTArc A380
HDMIHDMI 2.1HDMI 2.1
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4aDisplayPort 2.0
Device classDesktopDesktop
UpscalingFSRXeSS
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320
USB Type-CNoNo
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
TFLOPS13.31Better4.198
Power consumption250 W75 WBetter
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Power connector6+8 pin6 pin
Release date20222022
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0Xe-HPG
ThicknessDual-slotDual-slot
Compute APIOpenCL 2.1OpenCL 3.0
Launch price$549$139Better
Shader units / cores2560Better1024
Clock speed2150 - 2600 MHzBetter300 - 2000 MHz
Base clock2150 MHzBetter300 MHz
Boost clock2600 MHzBetter2000 MHz
VRAM12 GB GDDR6Better6 GB GDDR6
Memory frequency18 GHzBetter15,5 GHz
Memory bus192 bitBetter96 bit
Memory bandwidth432 GB/sBetter186 GB/s
InterfacePCIe 4x16PCIe 4x8
Power consumption250 W75 WBetter
Process node7 nm6 nmBetter
Recommended PSU600 W250 WBetter
Length267 mm222 mmBetter
Die size335 mm²157 mm²Better
Memory cacheL1 128 KB, L2 3 MBL2 4 MBBetter
Transistor count17200 millionBetter7200 million
Max monitors44
GAME TEST BENCH

Gaming FPS

Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.

The Gaming FPS section compares RX 6750 XT and Arc A380 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.

RX 6750 XTArc A380
Verified H2HCommunity VerifiedEstimatedPredicted
Black Myth: Wukong

Black Myth: Wukong

1080p High
25 FPSEstimated 66%
22 FPSEstimated 66%
1080p Ultra
21 FPSEstimated 66%
19 FPSEstimated 66%
1440p Ultra
16 FPSEstimated 66%
10 FPSEstimated 59%
4K Ultra
8 FPSEstimated 64%
5 FPSEstimated 55%
Game1080p High1080p Ultra1440p Ultra4K Ultra
Black Myth: WukongRX 6750 XT25 FPSEstimated 66%Arc A38022 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6750 XT21 FPSEstimated 66%Arc A38019 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6750 XT16 FPSEstimated 66%Arc A38010 FPSEstimated 59%RX 6750 XT8 FPSEstimated 64%Arc A3805 FPSEstimated 55%
Call of Duty: WarzoneRX 6750 XT25 FPSEstimated 66%Arc A38022 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6750 XT21 FPSEstimated 66%Arc A38019 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6750 XT16 FPSEstimated 66%Arc A38010 FPSEstimated 59%RX 6750 XT8 FPSEstimated 64%Arc A3805 FPSEstimated 55%
Counter-Strike 2RX 6750 XT211 FPSEstimated 74%Arc A380188 FPSEstimated 74%RX 6750 XT149 FPSEstimated 74%Arc A380129 FPSEstimated 74%RX 6750 XT116 FPSEstimated 74%Arc A38069 FPSEstimated 67%RX 6750 XT51 FPSEstimated 72%Arc A38023 FPSEstimated 62%
Cyberpunk 2077RX 6750 XT136 FPSEstimated 74%Arc A380121 FPSEstimated 74%RX 6750 XT118 FPSEstimated 74%Arc A380102 FPSEstimated 74%RX 6750 XT84 FPSEstimated 74%Arc A38050 FPSEstimated 67%RX 6750 XT34 FPSEstimated 72%Arc A38015 FPSEstimated 62%
Forza Horizon 5RX 6750 XT172 FPSEstimated 80%Arc A380153 FPSEstimated 80%RX 6750 XT111 FPSEstimated 74%Arc A38097 FPSEstimated 74%RX 6750 XT104 FPSEstimated 74%Arc A38062 FPSEstimated 67%RX 6750 XT76 FPSEstimated 72%Arc A38034 FPSEstimated 62%
God of War RagnarökRX 6750 XT25 FPSEstimated 66%Arc A38022 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6750 XT21 FPSEstimated 66%Arc A38019 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6750 XT16 FPSEstimated 66%Arc A38010 FPSEstimated 59%RX 6750 XT8 FPSEstimated 64%Arc A3805 FPSEstimated 55%
Hogwarts LegacyRX 6750 XT111 FPSEstimated 74%Arc A38099 FPSEstimated 74%RX 6750 XT93 FPSEstimated 74%Arc A38081 FPSEstimated 74%RX 6750 XT75 FPSEstimated 74%Arc A38045 FPSEstimated 67%RX 6750 XT35 FPSEstimated 72%Arc A38016 FPSEstimated 62%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024RX 6750 XT25 FPSEstimated 66%Arc A38022 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6750 XT21 FPSEstimated 66%Arc A38019 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6750 XT16 FPSEstimated 66%Arc A38010 FPSEstimated 59%RX 6750 XT8 FPSEstimated 64%Arc A3805 FPSEstimated 55%
Monster Hunter WildsRX 6750 XT25 FPSEstimated 66%Arc A38022 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6750 XT21 FPSEstimated 66%Arc A38019 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6750 XT16 FPSEstimated 66%Arc A38010 FPSEstimated 59%RX 6750 XT8 FPSEstimated 64%Arc A3805 FPSEstimated 55%
StarfieldRX 6750 XT25 FPSEstimated 66%Arc A38022 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6750 XT21 FPSEstimated 66%Arc A38019 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6750 XT16 FPSEstimated 66%Arc A38010 FPSEstimated 59%RX 6750 XT8 FPSEstimated 64%Arc A3805 FPSEstimated 55%
Average FPSRX 6750 XT78 FPSArc A38069 FPSRX 6750 XT60 FPSArc A38052 FPSRX 6750 XT48 FPSArc A38029 FPSRX 6750 XT24 FPSArc A38012 FPS
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H workload indices

Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.

The Benchmarks section compares RX 6750 XT and Arc A380 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

IndexRX 6750 XTArc A380Difference
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100503633%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100604431%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100584330%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100806029%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1006710040%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H AI workload indices

Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.

The Detailed comparison section compares RX 6750 XT and Arc A380 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

IndexRX 6750 XTArc A380Difference
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100634729%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100624630%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100584330%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100664930%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100594331%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling

The Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling section compares RX 6750 XT and Arc A380 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRX 6750 XTArc A380
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingFSRXeSS
Compute APIOpenCL 2.1OpenCL 3.0

Architecture and release

The Architecture and release section compares RX 6750 XT and Arc A380 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRX 6750 XTArc A380
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0Xe-HPG
Process node7 nm6 nmBetter
Release date20222022
Device classDesktopDesktop

GPU cores, die and clocks

The Core layout and clocks section compares RX 6750 XT and Arc A380 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRX 6750 XTArc A380
Transistor count17200 millionBetter7200 million
Die size335 mm²157 mm²Better
Shader units / cores2560Better1024
Base clock2150 MHzBetter300 MHz
Boost clock2600 MHzBetter2000 MHz

Board size, power and compatibility

The Form factor and compatibility section compares RX 6750 XT and Arc A380 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRX 6750 XTArc A380
InterfacePCIe 4x16PCIe 4x8
Length267 mm222 mmBetter
ThicknessDual-slotDual-slot
Recommended PSU600 W250 WBetter
Power connector6+8 pin6 pin

Display outputs and limits

The Display outputs section compares RX 6750 XT and Arc A380 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRX 6750 XTArc A380
HDMIHDMI 2.1HDMI 2.1
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4aDisplayPort 2.0
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitors44
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320

Memory and compute throughput

The VRAM capacity and bandwidth section compares RX 6750 XT and Arc A380 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRX 6750 XTArc A380
VRAM12 GB GDDR6Better6 GB GDDR6
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Memory bus192 bitBetter96 bit
TFLOPS13.31Better4.198
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER

Other comparisons

6

Reviews and questions

AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD

Explain this comparison

Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.

Device ARX 6750 XT61
Device BArc A38060
What AI will explain

Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.

REAL CONFIGURATIONS

Owner experiences

Real builds, results, and community feedback.

Moderator reviewedHelpful to the community🏅Expert badges
FAQ · CHOOSE BY USE CASE

Frequently asked comparison questions

Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.

01Which is better for gaming: RX 6750 XT or Arc A380?

RX 6750 XT has the higher overall gaming score, while Arc A380 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.

02Which is better for streaming?

RX 6750 XT is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.

03Which is better for Blender?

RX 6750 XT is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.

04Which is better for video editing?

RX 6750 XT offers more overall performance, while RX 6750 XT offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.

05Which is better for neural networks and AI?

RX 6750 XT is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.

06Which is better for 1080p?

Arc A380 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.

07Which is better for 1440p?

RX 6750 XT leads in combined 1440p performance. RX 6750 XT can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.

08Which is better for 4K?

RX 6750 XT is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.

09Which is better for a quiet PC?

Arc A380 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.

10Which is better without replacing the power supply?

Arc A380 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.

11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?

Consider upgrading to RX 6750 XT if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.