H2H

Radeon RX 6750 XT vs Radeon RX 5700 XT

Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RX 6750 XT and RX 5700 XT across specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 6750 XT outperforms RX 5700 XT by 11% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+11%

Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.
QUICK COMPARISON ANALYSIS

Radeon RX 6750 XT vs Radeon RX 5700 XT: key takeaway

The comparison of RX 6750 XT and RX 5700 XT shows a 11% advantage for RX 6750 XT in gaming performance, while RX 5700 XT may still be stronger in value for money. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.

SUMMARY PROFILE

Verified-metrics radar

Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.

H2H
Performance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
Performance
5045
Efficiency
6767
Price / performance
91100
Memory capacity
8068
Missing values are never replaced with zero or an average.Model: H2H 2026.07 fixed scale.
COMPARISON RESULT

RX 6750 XT is the best overall choice

RX 6750 XT leads in combined game performance. RX 5700 XT offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.

PERFORMANCE DIFFERENCE2%

RX 6750 XT leads in the combined performance index

PRICE DIFFERENCE$275

RX 5700 XT costs less

CATALOG POSITION

Graphics card ranking

Full ranking →

The ranking is recalculated automatically from catalog data.

Positions 115–120of 317
RX 6750 XTnot in TOP100position in the GPU ranking
RX 5700 XTnot in TOP100position in the GPU ranking
COMPARISON VERDICT

Which should you choose?

Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.

COMMUNITY CHOICE

Radeon RX 6750 XT

130 likes

Head to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.

$/FPSBEST PRICE / FPS

Radeon RX 5700 XT

100/100 · Price $299

The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.

OVERALL SCORE

Overview

Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.

The Summary score section compares RX 6750 XT and RX 5700 XT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

CategoryRX 6750 XTRX 5700 XT
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
50Better
45
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
42Better
39
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
40Better
36
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
67
67
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
61Better
60
FULL COMPARISON

Specifications

The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.

The Specifications section compares RX 6750 XT and RX 5700 XT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationRX 6750 XTRX 5700 XT
HDMIHDMI 2.1HDMI 2.0b
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4aDisplayPort 1.4a
Device classDesktopDesktop
UpscalingFSRFSR
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320
USB Type-CNoNo
DirectX12.212.1
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
TFLOPS13.31Better9.754
Power consumption250 W225 WBetter
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Power connector6+8 pin6+8 pin
Release date20222019
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0BetterRDNA 1.0
ThicknessDual-slotDual-slot
Compute APIOpenCL 2.1OpenCL 2.1
Launch price$549$299Better
Shader units / cores25602560
Clock speed2150 - 2600 MHzBetter1605 - 1755 MHz
Base clock2150 MHzBetter1605 MHz
Boost clock2600 MHzBetter1755 MHz
VRAM12 GB GDDR6Better8 GB GDDR6
Memory frequency18 GHzBetter14 GHz
Memory bus192 bit256 bitBetter
Memory bandwidth432 GB/s448 GB/sBetter
InterfacePCIe 4x16PCIe 4x16
Power consumption250 W225 WBetter
Process node7 nm7 nm
Recommended PSU600 W550 WBetter
Length267 mmBetter272 mm
Die size335 mm²251 mm²Better
Memory cacheL1 128 KB, L2 3 MBL2 4 MBBetter
Transistor count17200 millionBetter10300 million
Max monitors44
GAME TEST BENCH

Gaming FPS

Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.

The Gaming FPS section compares RX 6750 XT and RX 5700 XT across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.

RX 6750 XTRX 5700 XT
Verified H2HCommunity VerifiedEstimatedPredicted
Black Myth: Wukong

Black Myth: Wukong

1080p High
25 FPSEstimated 66%
24 FPSEstimated 66%
1080p Ultra
21 FPSEstimated 66%
20 FPSEstimated 66%
1440p Ultra
16 FPSEstimated 66%
15 FPSEstimated 66%
4K Ultra
8 FPSEstimated 64%
6 FPSEstimated 60%
Game1080p High1080p Ultra1440p Ultra4K Ultra
Black Myth: WukongRX 6750 XT25 FPSEstimated 66%RX 5700 XT24 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6750 XT21 FPSEstimated 66%RX 5700 XT20 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6750 XT16 FPSEstimated 66%RX 5700 XT15 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6750 XT8 FPSEstimated 64%RX 5700 XT6 FPSEstimated 60%
Call of Duty: WarzoneRX 6750 XT25 FPSEstimated 66%RX 5700 XT24 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6750 XT21 FPSEstimated 66%RX 5700 XT20 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6750 XT16 FPSEstimated 66%RX 5700 XT15 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6750 XT8 FPSEstimated 64%RX 5700 XT6 FPSEstimated 60%
Counter-Strike 2RX 6750 XT211 FPSEstimated 74%RX 5700 XT200 FPSEstimated 74%RX 6750 XT149 FPSEstimated 74%RX 5700 XT140 FPSEstimated 74%RX 6750 XT116 FPSEstimated 74%RX 5700 XT109 FPSEstimated 74%RX 6750 XT51 FPSEstimated 72%RX 5700 XT40 FPSEstimated 68%
Cyberpunk 2077RX 6750 XT136 FPSEstimated 74%RX 5700 XT129 FPSEstimated 74%RX 6750 XT118 FPSEstimated 74%RX 5700 XT111 FPSEstimated 74%RX 6750 XT84 FPSEstimated 74%RX 5700 XT79 FPSEstimated 74%RX 6750 XT34 FPSEstimated 72%RX 5700 XT27 FPSEstimated 68%
Forza Horizon 5RX 6750 XT172 FPSEstimated 80%RX 5700 XT163 FPSEstimated 80%RX 6750 XT111 FPSEstimated 74%RX 5700 XT105 FPSEstimated 74%RX 6750 XT104 FPSEstimated 74%RX 5700 XT98 FPSEstimated 74%RX 6750 XT76 FPSEstimated 72%RX 5700 XT59 FPSEstimated 68%
God of War RagnarökRX 6750 XT25 FPSEstimated 66%RX 5700 XT24 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6750 XT21 FPSEstimated 66%RX 5700 XT20 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6750 XT16 FPSEstimated 66%RX 5700 XT15 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6750 XT8 FPSEstimated 64%RX 5700 XT6 FPSEstimated 60%
Hogwarts LegacyRX 6750 XT111 FPSEstimated 74%RX 5700 XT105 FPSEstimated 74%RX 6750 XT93 FPSEstimated 74%RX 5700 XT88 FPSEstimated 74%RX 6750 XT75 FPSEstimated 74%RX 5700 XT71 FPSEstimated 74%RX 6750 XT35 FPSEstimated 72%RX 5700 XT28 FPSEstimated 68%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024RX 6750 XT25 FPSEstimated 66%RX 5700 XT24 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6750 XT21 FPSEstimated 66%RX 5700 XT20 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6750 XT16 FPSEstimated 66%RX 5700 XT15 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6750 XT8 FPSEstimated 64%RX 5700 XT6 FPSEstimated 60%
Monster Hunter WildsRX 6750 XT25 FPSEstimated 66%RX 5700 XT24 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6750 XT21 FPSEstimated 66%RX 5700 XT20 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6750 XT16 FPSEstimated 66%RX 5700 XT15 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6750 XT8 FPSEstimated 64%RX 5700 XT6 FPSEstimated 60%
StarfieldRX 6750 XT25 FPSEstimated 66%RX 5700 XT24 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6750 XT21 FPSEstimated 66%RX 5700 XT20 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6750 XT16 FPSEstimated 66%RX 5700 XT15 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6750 XT8 FPSEstimated 64%RX 5700 XT6 FPSEstimated 60%
Average FPSRX 6750 XT78 FPSRX 5700 XT74 FPSRX 6750 XT60 FPSRX 5700 XT56 FPSRX 6750 XT48 FPSRX 5700 XT45 FPSRX 6750 XT24 FPSRX 5700 XT19 FPS
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H workload indices

Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.

The Benchmarks section compares RX 6750 XT and RX 5700 XT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

IndexRX 6750 XTRX 5700 XTDifference
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100504511%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100605116%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100585211%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100806816%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 10067670%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H AI workload indices

Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.

The Detailed comparison section compares RX 6750 XT and RX 5700 XT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

IndexRX 6750 XTRX 5700 XTDifference
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100635514%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100625414%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100585211%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100665813%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100595213%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling

The Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling section compares RX 6750 XT and RX 5700 XT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRX 6750 XTRX 5700 XT
DirectX12.212.1
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingFSRFSR
Compute APIOpenCL 2.1OpenCL 2.1

Architecture and release

The Architecture and release section compares RX 6750 XT and RX 5700 XT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRX 6750 XTRX 5700 XT
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0BetterRDNA 1.0
Process node7 nm7 nm
Release date20222019
Device classDesktopDesktop

GPU cores, die and clocks

The Core layout and clocks section compares RX 6750 XT and RX 5700 XT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRX 6750 XTRX 5700 XT
Transistor count17200 millionBetter10300 million
Die size335 mm²251 mm²Better
Shader units / cores25602560
Base clock2150 MHzBetter1605 MHz
Boost clock2600 MHzBetter1755 MHz

Board size, power and compatibility

The Form factor and compatibility section compares RX 6750 XT and RX 5700 XT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRX 6750 XTRX 5700 XT
InterfacePCIe 4x16PCIe 4x16
Length267 mmBetter272 mm
ThicknessDual-slotDual-slot
Recommended PSU600 W550 WBetter
Power connector6+8 pin6+8 pin

Display outputs and limits

The Display outputs section compares RX 6750 XT and RX 5700 XT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRX 6750 XTRX 5700 XT
HDMIHDMI 2.1HDMI 2.0b
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4aDisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitors44
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320

Memory and compute throughput

The VRAM capacity and bandwidth section compares RX 6750 XT and RX 5700 XT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRX 6750 XTRX 5700 XT
VRAM12 GB GDDR6Better8 GB GDDR6
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Memory bus192 bit256 bitBetter
TFLOPS13.31Better9.754
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER

Other comparisons

6

Reviews and questions

AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD

Explain this comparison

Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.

Device ARX 6750 XT61
Device BRX 5700 XT60
What AI will explain

Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.

REAL CONFIGURATIONS

Owner experiences

Real builds, results, and community feedback.

Moderator reviewedHelpful to the community🏅Expert badges
FAQ · CHOOSE BY USE CASE

Frequently asked comparison questions

Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.

01Which is better for gaming: RX 6750 XT or RX 5700 XT?

RX 6750 XT has the higher overall gaming score, while RX 5700 XT offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.

02Which is better for streaming?

RX 6750 XT is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.

03Which is better for Blender?

RX 6750 XT is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.

04Which is better for video editing?

RX 6750 XT offers more overall performance, while RX 6750 XT offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.

05Which is better for neural networks and AI?

RX 6750 XT is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.

06Which is better for 1080p?

RX 5700 XT is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.

07Which is better for 1440p?

RX 6750 XT leads in combined 1440p performance. RX 6750 XT can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.

08Which is better for 4K?

RX 6750 XT is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.

09Which is better for a quiet PC?

RX 5700 XT is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.

10Which is better without replacing the power supply?

RX 5700 XT is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.

11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?

Consider upgrading to RX 6750 XT if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.