H2H

Radeon RX 6800 vs GeForce 8800 GTS rev 2

Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RX 6800 and 8800 GTS rev 2 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 6800 outperforms 8800 GTS rev 2 by 36% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+36%

Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.
QUICK COMPARISON ANALYSIS

Radeon RX 6800 vs GeForce 8800 GTS rev 2: key takeaway

The comparison of RX 6800 and 8800 GTS rev 2 shows a 36% advantage for RX 6800 in gaming performance, while 8800 GTS rev 2 may still be stronger in efficiency and feature set. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.

SUMMARY PROFILE

Verified-metrics radar

Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.

H2H
Performance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
Performance
5339
Efficiency
7196
Price / performance
100100
Memory capacity
8813
Missing values are never replaced with zero or an average.Model: H2H 2026.07 fixed scale.
COMPARISON RESULT

RX 6800 is the best overall choice

RX 6800 leads in combined game performance. RX 6800 offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.

PERFORMANCE DIFFERENCE8%

RX 6800 leads in the combined performance index

PRICE DIFFERENCE$280

8800 GTS rev 2 costs less

CATALOG POSITION

Graphics card ranking

Full ranking →

The ranking is recalculated automatically from catalog data.

Positions 52–57of 317
RX 6800#54position in the GPU ranking
8800 GTS rev 2#85position in the GPU ranking
COMPARISON VERDICT

Which should you choose?

Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.

COMMUNITY CHOICE

Radeon RX 6800

152 likes

Head to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.

$/FPSBEST PRICE / FPS

GeForce 8800 GTS rev 2

100/100 · Price $79

The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.

OVERALL SCORE

Overview

Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.

The Summary score section compares RX 6800 and 8800 GTS rev 2 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

CategoryRX 68008800 GTS rev 2
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
53Better
39
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
45Better
34
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
42Better
32
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
71
96Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
66Better
61
FULL COMPARISON

Specifications

The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.

The Specifications section compares RX 6800 and 8800 GTS rev 2 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationRX 68008800 GTS rev 2
HDMIHDMI 2.1
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4a
Device classDesktopDesktop
UpscalingFSR
Max monitors4Varies by board
Max resolution7680 × 4320Varies by board
USB Type-CYesNo
Power consumption250 W135 WBetter
DirectX12.210.0
Vulkan1.4
OpenGL4.63.3
TFLOPS16.17Better0.022
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR3
Power connector8+8 pin6 pin
Release date20202007
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0Tesla
ThicknessDual-slotSingle-slot
Compute APIOpenCL 2.1OpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.1
Launch price$579$79Better
Shader units / cores3840Better8
Clock speed1700 - 2105 MHzBetter650 MHz
Base clock1700 MHzBetter650 MHz
Boost clock2105 MHzBetter650 MHz
VRAM16 GB GDDR6512 MB GDDR3Better
Memory frequency16 GHzBetter1,64 GHz
Memory bus256 bit256 bit
Memory bandwidth512 GB/sBetter52 GB/s
InterfacePCIe 4x16PCIe 2x16
Power consumption250 W135 WBetter
Process node7 nmBetter65 nm
Recommended PSU600 W200 WBetter
Length267 mm170 mmBetter
Die size520 mm²86 mm²Better
Memory cacheL1 128 KB, L2 4 MBL2 0.02 MBBetter
Transistor count26800 millionBetter210 million
GAME TEST BENCH

Gaming FPS

Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.

The Gaming FPS section compares RX 6800 and 8800 GTS rev 2 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.

RX 68008800 GTS rev 2
Verified H2HCommunity VerifiedEstimatedPredicted
Black Myth: Wukong

Black Myth: Wukong

1080p High
26 FPSEstimated 66%
23 FPSEstimated 64%
1080p Ultra
22 FPSEstimated 66%
20 FPSEstimated 64%
1440p Ultra
17 FPSEstimated 66%
11 FPSEstimated 58%
4K Ultra
9 FPSEstimated 66%
5 FPSEstimated 55%
Game1080p High1080p Ultra1440p Ultra4K Ultra
Black Myth: WukongRX 680026 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GTS rev 223 FPSEstimated 64%RX 680022 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GTS rev 220 FPSEstimated 64%RX 680017 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GTS rev 211 FPSEstimated 58%RX 68009 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GTS rev 25 FPSEstimated 55%
Call of Duty: WarzoneRX 680026 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GTS rev 223 FPSEstimated 64%RX 680022 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GTS rev 220 FPSEstimated 64%RX 680017 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GTS rev 211 FPSEstimated 58%RX 68009 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GTS rev 25 FPSEstimated 55%
Counter-Strike 2RX 6800218 FPSEstimated 74%8800 GTS rev 2194 FPSEstimated 72%RX 6800153 FPSEstimated 74%8800 GTS rev 2137 FPSEstimated 72%RX 6800119 FPSEstimated 74%8800 GTS rev 276 FPSEstimated 66%RX 680059 FPSEstimated 74%8800 GTS rev 229 FPSEstimated 63%
Cyberpunk 2077RX 6800141 FPSEstimated 74%8800 GTS rev 2125 FPSEstimated 72%RX 6800121 FPSEstimated 74%8800 GTS rev 2108 FPSEstimated 72%RX 680086 FPSEstimated 74%8800 GTS rev 255 FPSEstimated 66%RX 680040 FPSEstimated 74%8800 GTS rev 219 FPSEstimated 63%
Forza Horizon 5RX 6800177 FPSEstimated 80%8800 GTS rev 2158 FPSEstimated 78%RX 6800115 FPSEstimated 74%8800 GTS rev 2102 FPSEstimated 72%RX 6800107 FPSEstimated 74%8800 GTS rev 269 FPSEstimated 66%RX 680087 FPSEstimated 74%8800 GTS rev 242 FPSEstimated 63%
God of War RagnarökRX 680026 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GTS rev 223 FPSEstimated 64%RX 680022 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GTS rev 220 FPSEstimated 64%RX 680017 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GTS rev 211 FPSEstimated 58%RX 68009 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GTS rev 25 FPSEstimated 55%
Hogwarts LegacyRX 6800115 FPSEstimated 74%8800 GTS rev 2102 FPSEstimated 72%RX 680096 FPSEstimated 74%8800 GTS rev 286 FPSEstimated 72%RX 680077 FPSEstimated 74%8800 GTS rev 250 FPSEstimated 66%RX 680040 FPSEstimated 74%8800 GTS rev 220 FPSEstimated 63%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024RX 680026 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GTS rev 223 FPSEstimated 64%RX 680022 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GTS rev 220 FPSEstimated 64%RX 680017 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GTS rev 211 FPSEstimated 58%RX 68009 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GTS rev 25 FPSEstimated 55%
Monster Hunter WildsRX 680026 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GTS rev 223 FPSEstimated 64%RX 680022 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GTS rev 220 FPSEstimated 64%RX 680017 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GTS rev 211 FPSEstimated 58%RX 68009 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GTS rev 25 FPSEstimated 55%
StarfieldRX 680026 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GTS rev 223 FPSEstimated 64%RX 680022 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GTS rev 220 FPSEstimated 64%RX 680017 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GTS rev 211 FPSEstimated 58%RX 68009 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GTS rev 25 FPSEstimated 55%
Average FPSRX 680081 FPS8800 GTS rev 272 FPSRX 680062 FPS8800 GTS rev 255 FPSRX 680049 FPS8800 GTS rev 232 FPSRX 680028 FPS8800 GTS rev 214 FPS
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H workload indices

Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.

The Benchmarks section compares RX 6800 and 8800 GTS rev 2 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

IndexRX 68008800 GTS rev 2Difference
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100533930%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100613262%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100633265%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 1008813149%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 100719630%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H AI workload indices

Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.

The Detailed comparison section compares RX 6800 and 8800 GTS rev 2 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

IndexRX 68008800 GTS rev 2Difference
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100692788%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100672882%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100633265%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 1007224100%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100643169%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling

The Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling section compares RX 6800 and 8800 GTS rev 2 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRX 68008800 GTS rev 2
DirectX12.210.0
Vulkan1.4
OpenGL4.63.3
UpscalingFSR
Compute APIOpenCL 2.1OpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.1

Architecture and release

The Architecture and release section compares RX 6800 and 8800 GTS rev 2 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRX 68008800 GTS rev 2
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0Tesla
Process node7 nmBetter65 nm
Release date20202007
Device classDesktopDesktop

GPU cores, die and clocks

The Core layout and clocks section compares RX 6800 and 8800 GTS rev 2 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRX 68008800 GTS rev 2
Transistor count26800 millionBetter210 million
Die size520 mm²86 mm²Better
Shader units / cores3840Better8
Base clock1700 MHzBetter650 MHz
Boost clock2105 MHzBetter650 MHz

Board size, power and compatibility

The Form factor and compatibility section compares RX 6800 and 8800 GTS rev 2 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRX 68008800 GTS rev 2
InterfacePCIe 4x16PCIe 2x16
Length267 mm170 mmBetter
ThicknessDual-slotSingle-slot
Recommended PSU600 W200 WBetter
Power connector8+8 pin6 pin

Display outputs and limits

The Display outputs section compares RX 6800 and 8800 GTS rev 2 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRX 68008800 GTS rev 2
HDMIHDMI 2.1
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-CYesNo
Max monitors4Varies by board
Max resolution7680 × 4320Varies by board

Memory and compute throughput

The VRAM capacity and bandwidth section compares RX 6800 and 8800 GTS rev 2 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRX 68008800 GTS rev 2
VRAM16 GB GDDR6512 MB GDDR3Better
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR3
Memory bus256 bit256 bit
TFLOPS16.17Better0.022
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER

Other comparisons

6

Reviews and questions

AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD

Explain this comparison

Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.

Device ARX 680066
Device B8800 GTS rev 261
What AI will explain

Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.

REAL CONFIGURATIONS

Owner experiences

Real builds, results, and community feedback.

Moderator reviewedHelpful to the community🏅Expert badges
FAQ · CHOOSE BY USE CASE

Frequently asked comparison questions

Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.

01Which is better for gaming: RX 6800 or 8800 GTS rev 2?

RX 6800 has the higher overall gaming score, while RX 6800 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.

02Which is better for streaming?

8800 GTS rev 2 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.

03Which is better for Blender?

8800 GTS rev 2 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.

04Which is better for video editing?

RX 6800 offers more overall performance, while RX 6800 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.

05Which is better for neural networks and AI?

8800 GTS rev 2 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.

06Which is better for 1080p?

RX 6800 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.

07Which is better for 1440p?

RX 6800 leads in combined 1440p performance. RX 6800 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.

08Which is better for 4K?

RX 6800 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.

09Which is better for a quiet PC?

8800 GTS rev 2 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.

10Which is better without replacing the power supply?

8800 GTS rev 2 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.

11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?

Consider upgrading to RX 6800 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.