H2H

Radeon RX 6800 vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RX 6800 and GTX 1650 SUPER across specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 6800 outperforms GTX 1650 SUPER by 43% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+43%

Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.
QUICK COMPARISON ANALYSIS

Radeon RX 6800 vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER: key takeaway

The comparison of RX 6800 and GTX 1650 SUPER shows a 43% advantage for RX 6800 in gaming performance, while GTX 1650 SUPER may still be stronger in efficiency and feature set. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.

SUMMARY PROFILE

Verified-metrics radar

Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.

H2H
Performance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
Performance
5337
Efficiency
71100
Price / performance
100100
Memory capacity
8860
Missing values are never replaced with zero or an average.Model: H2H 2026.07 fixed scale.
COMPARISON RESULT

RX 6800 is the best overall choice

RX 6800 leads in combined game performance. RX 6800 offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.

PERFORMANCE DIFFERENCE8%

RX 6800 leads in the combined performance index

PRICE DIFFERENCE$225

GTX 1650 SUPER costs less

CATALOG POSITION

Graphics card ranking

Full ranking →

The ranking is recalculated automatically from catalog data.

Positions 52–57of 317
RX 6800#54position in the GPU ranking
GTX 1650 SUPERnot in TOP100position in the GPU ranking
COMPARISON VERDICT

Which should you choose?

Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.

COMMUNITY CHOICE

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

172 likes

Head to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.

$/FPSBEST PRICE / FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

100/100 · Price $229

The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.

OVERALL SCORE

Overview

Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.

The Summary score section compares RX 6800 and GTX 1650 SUPER with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

CategoryRX 6800GTX 1650 SUPER
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
53Better
37
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
45Better
33
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
42Better
31
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
71
100Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
66Better
61
FULL COMPARISON

Specifications

The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.

The Specifications section compares RX 6800 and GTX 1650 SUPER with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationRX 6800GTX 1650 SUPER
HDMIHDMI 2.1HDMI 2.0
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4aDisplayPort 1.4a
Device classDesktopDesktop
UpscalingFSR
Max monitors43
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320
USB Type-CYesNo
Power consumption250 W100 WBetter
DirectX12.212.1
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
TFLOPS16.17Better4.416
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Power connector8+8 pin6 pin
Release date20202019
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0Turing
ThicknessDual-slotDual-slot
Compute APIOpenCL 2.1OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 7.5
Launch price$579$229Better
Shader units / cores3840Better1280
Clock speed1700 - 2105 MHzBetter1530 - 1725 MHz
Base clock1700 MHzBetter1530 MHz
Boost clock2105 MHzBetter1725 MHz
VRAM16 GB GDDR6Better4 GB GDDR6
Memory frequency16 GHzBetter12 GHz
Memory bus256 bitBetter128 bit
Memory bandwidth512 GB/sBetter192 GB/s
InterfacePCIe 4x16PCIe 3x16
Power consumption250 W100 WBetter
Process node7 nmBetter12 nm
Recommended PSU600 W300 WBetter
Length267 mm229 mmBetter
Die size520 mm²284 mm²Better
Memory cacheL1 128 KB, L2 4 MBL1 64 KB, L2 1 MB
Transistor count26800 millionBetter6600 million
GAME TEST BENCH

Gaming FPS

Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.

The Gaming FPS section compares RX 6800 and GTX 1650 SUPER across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.

RX 6800GTX 1650 SUPER
Verified H2HCommunity VerifiedEstimatedPredicted
Black Myth: Wukong

Black Myth: Wukong

1080p High
26 FPSEstimated 66%
22 FPSEstimated 66%
1080p Ultra
22 FPSEstimated 66%
19 FPSEstimated 66%
1440p Ultra
17 FPSEstimated 66%
10 FPSEstimated 60%
4K Ultra
9 FPSEstimated 66%
5 FPSEstimated 55%
Game1080p High1080p Ultra1440p Ultra4K Ultra
Black Myth: WukongRX 680026 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 1650 SUPER22 FPSEstimated 66%RX 680022 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 1650 SUPER19 FPSEstimated 66%RX 680017 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 1650 SUPER10 FPSEstimated 60%RX 68009 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 1650 SUPER5 FPSEstimated 55%
Call of Duty: WarzoneRX 680026 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 1650 SUPER22 FPSEstimated 66%RX 680022 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 1650 SUPER19 FPSEstimated 66%RX 680017 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 1650 SUPER10 FPSEstimated 60%RX 68009 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 1650 SUPER5 FPSEstimated 55%
Counter-Strike 2RX 6800218 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 1650 SUPER187 FPSEstimated 74%RX 6800153 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 1650 SUPER131 FPSEstimated 74%RX 6800119 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 1650 SUPER73 FPSEstimated 68%RX 680059 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 1650 SUPER23 FPSEstimated 62%
Cyberpunk 2077RX 6800141 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 1650 SUPER121 FPSEstimated 74%RX 6800121 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 1650 SUPER104 FPSEstimated 74%RX 680086 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 1650 SUPER53 FPSEstimated 68%RX 680040 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 1650 SUPER15 FPSEstimated 62%
Forza Horizon 5RX 6800177 FPSEstimated 80%GTX 1650 SUPER152 FPSEstimated 80%RX 6800115 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 1650 SUPER99 FPSEstimated 74%RX 6800107 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 1650 SUPER66 FPSEstimated 68%RX 680087 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 1650 SUPER34 FPSEstimated 62%
God of War RagnarökRX 680026 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 1650 SUPER22 FPSEstimated 66%RX 680022 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 1650 SUPER19 FPSEstimated 66%RX 680017 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 1650 SUPER10 FPSEstimated 60%RX 68009 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 1650 SUPER5 FPSEstimated 55%
Hogwarts LegacyRX 6800115 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 1650 SUPER99 FPSEstimated 74%RX 680096 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 1650 SUPER82 FPSEstimated 74%RX 680077 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 1650 SUPER48 FPSEstimated 68%RX 680040 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 1650 SUPER16 FPSEstimated 62%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024RX 680026 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 1650 SUPER22 FPSEstimated 66%RX 680022 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 1650 SUPER19 FPSEstimated 66%RX 680017 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 1650 SUPER10 FPSEstimated 60%RX 68009 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 1650 SUPER5 FPSEstimated 55%
Monster Hunter WildsRX 680026 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 1650 SUPER22 FPSEstimated 66%RX 680022 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 1650 SUPER19 FPSEstimated 66%RX 680017 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 1650 SUPER10 FPSEstimated 60%RX 68009 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 1650 SUPER5 FPSEstimated 55%
StarfieldRX 680026 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 1650 SUPER22 FPSEstimated 66%RX 680022 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 1650 SUPER19 FPSEstimated 66%RX 680017 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 1650 SUPER10 FPSEstimated 60%RX 68009 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 1650 SUPER5 FPSEstimated 55%
Average FPSRX 680081 FPSGTX 1650 SUPER69 FPSRX 680062 FPSGTX 1650 SUPER53 FPSRX 680049 FPSGTX 1650 SUPER30 FPSRX 680028 FPSGTX 1650 SUPER12 FPS
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H workload indices

Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.

The Benchmarks section compares RX 6800 and GTX 1650 SUPER with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

IndexRX 6800GTX 1650 SUPERDifference
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100533736%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100614432%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100634436%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100886038%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1007110034%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H AI workload indices

Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.

The Detailed comparison section compares RX 6800 and GTX 1650 SUPER with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

IndexRX 6800GTX 1650 SUPERDifference
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100694836%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100674637%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100634436%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100725036%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100644437%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling

The Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling section compares RX 6800 and GTX 1650 SUPER with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRX 6800GTX 1650 SUPER
DirectX12.212.1
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingFSR
Compute APIOpenCL 2.1OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 7.5

Architecture and release

The Architecture and release section compares RX 6800 and GTX 1650 SUPER with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRX 6800GTX 1650 SUPER
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0Turing
Process node7 nmBetter12 nm
Release date20202019
Device classDesktopDesktop

GPU cores, die and clocks

The Core layout and clocks section compares RX 6800 and GTX 1650 SUPER with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRX 6800GTX 1650 SUPER
Transistor count26800 millionBetter6600 million
Die size520 mm²284 mm²Better
Shader units / cores3840Better1280
Base clock1700 MHzBetter1530 MHz
Boost clock2105 MHzBetter1725 MHz

Board size, power and compatibility

The Form factor and compatibility section compares RX 6800 and GTX 1650 SUPER with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRX 6800GTX 1650 SUPER
InterfacePCIe 4x16PCIe 3x16
Length267 mm229 mmBetter
ThicknessDual-slotDual-slot
Recommended PSU600 W300 WBetter
Power connector8+8 pin6 pin

Display outputs and limits

The Display outputs section compares RX 6800 and GTX 1650 SUPER with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRX 6800GTX 1650 SUPER
HDMIHDMI 2.1HDMI 2.0
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4aDisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-CYesNo
Max monitors43
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320

Memory and compute throughput

The VRAM capacity and bandwidth section compares RX 6800 and GTX 1650 SUPER with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRX 6800GTX 1650 SUPER
VRAM16 GB GDDR6Better4 GB GDDR6
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Memory bus256 bitBetter128 bit
TFLOPS16.17Better4.416
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER

Other comparisons

6

Reviews and questions

AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD

Explain this comparison

Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.

Device ARX 680066
Device BGTX 1650 SUPER61
What AI will explain

Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.

REAL CONFIGURATIONS

Owner experiences

Real builds, results, and community feedback.

Moderator reviewedHelpful to the community🏅Expert badges
FAQ · CHOOSE BY USE CASE

Frequently asked comparison questions

Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.

01Which is better for gaming: RX 6800 or GTX 1650 SUPER?

RX 6800 has the higher overall gaming score, while RX 6800 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.

02Which is better for streaming?

GTX 1650 SUPER is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.

03Which is better for Blender?

GTX 1650 SUPER is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.

04Which is better for video editing?

RX 6800 offers more overall performance, while RX 6800 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.

05Which is better for neural networks and AI?

GTX 1650 SUPER is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.

06Which is better for 1080p?

RX 6800 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.

07Which is better for 1440p?

RX 6800 leads in combined 1440p performance. RX 6800 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.

08Which is better for 4K?

RX 6800 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.

09Which is better for a quiet PC?

GTX 1650 SUPER is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.

10Which is better without replacing the power supply?

GTX 1650 SUPER is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.

11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?

Consider upgrading to RX 6800 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.