AMD
Radeon RX 6800 XT vs GeForce RTX 4060
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
NVIDIA
RTX 4060
Aggregate performance score
We've compared RX 6800 XT and RTX 4060 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗RX 6800 XT outperforms RTX 4060 by ~20% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+20%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: Radeon RX 6800 XT (~2%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider RX 6800 XT
- Higher catalog performance index
- More graphics memory
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 2.1 · FSR
Reasons to consider RTX 4060
- Lower stated power consumption
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 8.9 · DLSS 3
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMD
NVIDIAPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
5546
61100
5041
8868
Graphics card ranking
Positions 51–56of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon RX 6800 XT
150 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
GeForce RTX 4060
Price $250.00Based on catalog performance per unit of current market price, not measured FPS.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
55Better
46
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
46Better
40
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
44Better
37
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
61
100Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
51Better
50
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
DisplayPort
HDMI
Device class
Upscaling
Max monitors
Max resolution
USB Type-C
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Memory type
Power connector
Release date
Architecture
Thickness
Compute API
Launch priceBetter
Shader units / coresBetter
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAMBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory busBetter
Memory bandwidthBetter
Interface
Power consumptionBetter
Process nodeBetter
Recommended PSUBetter
LengthBetter
Die sizeBetter
Memory cache
Transistor countBetter
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares RX 6800 XT and RTX 4060 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
RX 6800 XTRTX 4060
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
228 FPS
216 FPS
1080p Ultra
161 FPS
152 FPS
1440p Ultra
125 FPS
107 FPS
4K Ultra
62 FPS
32 FPS
Counter-Strike 2RX 6800 XT228 FPSRTX 4060216 FPSRX 6800 XT161 FPSRTX 4060152 FPSRX 6800 XT125 FPSRTX 4060107 FPSRX 6800 XT62 FPSRTX 406032 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077RX 6800 XT147 FPSRTX 4060139 FPSRX 6800 XT127 FPSRTX 4060120 FPSRX 6800 XT90 FPSRTX 406078 FPSRX 6800 XT42 FPSRTX 406021 FPS
Forza Horizon 5RX 6800 XT186 FPSRTX 4060176 FPSRX 6800 XT120 FPSRTX 4060114 FPSRX 6800 XT112 FPSRTX 406097 FPSRX 6800 XT91 FPSRTX 406046 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyRX 6800 XT120 FPSRTX 4060114 FPSRX 6800 XT101 FPSRTX 406095 FPSRX 6800 XT81 FPSRTX 406070 FPSRX 6800 XT42 FPSRTX 406022 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100554618%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100635514%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100645221%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100886826%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1006110048%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100705622%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100685521%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100645221%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100735823%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100655320%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingFSRDLSS 3
Compute APIOpenCL 2.1OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 8.9
Architecture and release
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0Ada Lovelace
Process node7 nm5 nmBetter
Release date20202023
Device classDesktopDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count26800 millionBetter18900 million
Die size520 mm²159 mm²Better
Shader units / cores4608Better3072
Base clock1825 MHz1830 MHzBetter
Boost clock2250 MHz2460 MHzBetter
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 4x16PCIe 4x8
Length267 mm240 mmBetter
ThicknessDual-slotDual-slot
Recommended PSU700 W300 WBetter
Power connector8+8 pin8 pin
Display outputs and limits
HDMIHDMI 2.1HDMI 2.1
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4aDisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-CYesNo
Max monitors44
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM16 GB GDDR6Better8 GB GDDR6
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Memory bus256 bitBetter128 bit
TFLOPS20.74Better15.11
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 70
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (4)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (6)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record changed: product_prices
- · Record changed: product_prices
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: RX 6800 XT or RTX 4060?+
RX 6800 XT has the higher overall gaming score, while RX 6800 XT offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
RTX 4060 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
RTX 4060 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
RX 6800 XT offers more overall performance, while RX 6800 XT offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RTX 4060 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
RX 6800 XT is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
RX 6800 XT leads in combined 1440p performance. RX 6800 XT can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RX 6800 XT is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
RTX 4060 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
RTX 4060 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to RX 6800 XT if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.