AMD
Radeon RX 7400 vs FirePro W4300
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
AMD
FirePro W4300
Aggregate performance score
We've compared RX 7400 and FirePro W4300 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗RX 7400 outperforms FirePro W4300 by ~8% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+8%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: Radeon RX 7400 (~8%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider RX 7400
- Higher catalog performance index
- More graphics memory
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 2.2 · FSR
Reasons to consider FirePro W4300
- Lower stated power consumption
- Lower recorded market price
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 2.1 · Not supported
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMDPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
4032
100100
88100
6856
Graphics card ranking
Positions 104–109of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon RX 7400
94 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
FirePro W4300
Price $65.00Based on catalog performance per unit of current market price, not measured FPS.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
40Better
32
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
35Better
29
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
33Better
27
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100
100
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
56Better
52
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
DisplayPort
HDMI
Device class
Upscaling
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Memory type
Power connector
Release date
ArchitectureBetter
Thickness
Compute API
Launch price
Shader units / coresBetter
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Max monitors
Max resolution
USB Type-C
Length
Boost clockBetter
VRAMBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory bus
Memory bandwidthBetter
Interface
Power consumptionBetter
Process nodeBetter
Recommended PSUBetter
Die sizeBetter
Memory cache
Transistor countBetter
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares RX 7400 and FirePro W4300 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
RX 7400FirePro W4300
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
197 FPS
162 FPS
1080p Ultra
139 FPS
112 FPS
1440p Ultra
85 FPS
62 FPS
4K Ultra
27 FPS
22 FPS
Counter-Strike 2RX 7400197 FPSFirePro W4300162 FPSRX 7400139 FPSFirePro W4300112 FPSRX 740085 FPSFirePro W430062 FPSRX 740027 FPSFirePro W430022 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077RX 7400127 FPSFirePro W4300104 FPSRX 7400110 FPSFirePro W430088 FPSRX 740062 FPSFirePro W430045 FPSRX 740018 FPSFirePro W430014 FPS
Forza Horizon 5RX 7400161 FPSFirePro W4300132 FPSRX 7400104 FPSFirePro W430084 FPSRX 740077 FPSFirePro W430055 FPSRX 740040 FPSFirePro W430032 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyRX 7400104 FPSFirePro W430085 FPSRX 740087 FPSFirePro W430070 FPSRX 740055 FPSFirePro W430040 FPSRX 740018 FPSFirePro W430015 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100403222%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100503535%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100483921%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100685619%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001001000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100534321%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100514122%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100483921%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100564522%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100483921%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12.212.0
Vulkan1.41.2
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingFSRNot supported
Compute APIOpenCL 2.2OpenCL 2.1
Architecture and release
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0BetterGCN 2.0
Process node6 nmBetter28 nm
Release date20252015
Device classDesktopProf
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count13300 millionBetter2080 million
Die size204 mm²160 mm²Better
Shader units / cores1792Better768
Base clock1452 MHzBetter930 MHz
Boost clock2300 MHzBetter930 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 4x8PCIe 3x16
LengthVaries by board171 mm
ThicknessDual-slotSingle-slot
Recommended PSU200 WBetter250 W
Power connector1x 6-pinNone
Display outputs and limits
HDMIHDMI 2.1aBoard dependent
DisplayPortDisplayPort 2.1mini-DisplayPort 1.2
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitors44
Max resolution7680 × 43204096 × 2160
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM8 GB GDDR6Better4 GB GDDR5
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Memory bus128 bit128 bit
TFLOPS8Better1.429
Other comparisons
RTX 2070 SUPERNVIDIAReviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 70
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (5)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (2)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: RX 7400 or FirePro W4300?+
RX 7400 has the higher overall gaming score, while FirePro W4300 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
RX 7400 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
RX 7400 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
RX 7400 offers more overall performance, while RX 7400 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RX 7400 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
FirePro W4300 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
RX 7400 leads in combined 1440p performance. RX 7400 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RX 7400 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
FirePro W4300 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
FirePro W4300 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to RX 7400 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.