AMD
Radeon RX 7400 vs GeForce 305M
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
NVIDIA
GeForce 305M
Aggregate performance score
We've compared RX 7400 and GeForce 305M across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗RX 7400 outperforms GeForce 305M by ~33% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+33%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: Radeon RX 7400 (~33%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider RX 7400
- Higher catalog performance index
- More graphics memory
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 2.2 · FSR
Reasons to consider GeForce 305M
- Lower stated power consumption
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.2 · Not supported
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMD
NVIDIAPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
4030
100100
8854
6843
Graphics card ranking
Positions 104–109of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce 305M
177 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
40Better
30
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
35Better
28
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
33Better
26
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100
100
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
56Better
42
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
DisplayPort
HDMI
Device class
Upscaling
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Memory type
Power connector
Release date
Architecture
Thickness
Compute API
Launch price—
Shader units / coresBetter
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Max monitors
Max resolution
USB Type-C
Length
Boost clockBetter
VRAMBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory busBetter
Memory bandwidthBetter
Interface
Power consumptionBetter
Process nodeBetter
Recommended PSU
Die sizeBetter
Memory cacheBetter
Transistor countBetter
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares RX 7400 and GeForce 305M across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
RX 7400GeForce 305M
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
197 FPS
150 FPS
1080p Ultra
139 FPS
105 FPS
1440p Ultra
85 FPS
56 FPS
4K Ultra
27 FPS
20 FPS
Counter-Strike 2RX 7400197 FPSGeForce 305M150 FPSRX 7400139 FPSGeForce 305M105 FPSRX 740085 FPSGeForce 305M56 FPSRX 740027 FPSGeForce 305M20 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077RX 7400127 FPSGeForce 305M97 FPSRX 7400110 FPSGeForce 305M83 FPSRX 740062 FPSGeForce 305M41 FPSRX 740018 FPSGeForce 305M14 FPS
Forza Horizon 5RX 7400161 FPSGeForce 305M122 FPSRX 7400104 FPSGeForce 305M79 FPSRX 740077 FPSGeForce 305M51 FPSRX 740040 FPSGeForce 305M30 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyRX 7400104 FPSGeForce 305M79 FPSRX 740087 FPSGeForce 305M66 FPSRX 740055 FPSGeForce 305M37 FPSRX 740018 FPSGeForce 305M14 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100403029%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100503050%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100483434%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100684345%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001001000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100533638%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100513537%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100483434%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100563741%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100483434%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12.210.1
Vulkan1.4Not supported
OpenGL4.63.3
UpscalingFSRNot supported
Compute APIOpenCL 2.2OpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.2
Architecture and release
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0Tesla
Process node6 nmBetter40 nm
Release date20252010
Device classDesktopMobile
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count13300 millionBetter260 million
Die size204 mm²57 mm²Better
Shader units / cores1792Better16
Base clock1452 MHzBetter525 MHz
Boost clock2300 MHzBetter525 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 4x8PCIe 2.0 x16
LengthVaries by boardOEM dependent
ThicknessDual-slotIGP
Recommended PSU200 WOEM dependent
Power connector1x 6-pinNone
Display outputs and limits
HDMIHDMI 2.1aOEM dependent
DisplayPortDisplayPort 2.1OEM dependent
USB Type-CNoOEM dependent
Max monitors4OEM dependent
Max resolution7680 × 4320Depends on host system
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM8 GB GDDR6Better0.5 GB GDDR3
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR3 / DDR3
Memory bus128 bitBetter64 bit
TFLOPS8Better0.037
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 69
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (3)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (2)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: RX 7400 or GeForce 305M?+
RX 7400 has the higher overall gaming score, while RX 7400 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
GeForce 305M is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
GeForce 305M is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
RX 7400 offers more overall performance, while RX 7400 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
GeForce 305M is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
RX 7400 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
RX 7400 leads in combined 1440p performance. RX 7400 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RX 7400 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
GeForce 305M is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
GeForce 305M is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to RX 7400 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.