AMD
Radeon RX 7400 vs Radeon R9 290
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
AMD
R9 290
Aggregate performance score
We've compared RX 7400 and R9 290 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗RX 7400 outperforms R9 290 by ~5% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+5%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: Radeon RX 7400 (~22%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider RX 7400
- Higher catalog performance index
- More graphics memory
- Lower stated power consumption
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 2.2 · FSR
Reasons to consider R9 290
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 2.1 · Not supported
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMDPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
4038
10046
88100
6856
Graphics card ranking
Positions 104–109of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon R9 290
153 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Radeon R9 290
Price $46.00Based on catalog performance per unit of current market price, not measured FPS.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
40Better
38
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
35Better
34
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
33Better
31
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
46
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
56Better
46
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
DisplayPort
HDMI
Device class
Upscaling
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Memory type
Power connector
Release date
ArchitectureBetter
Thickness
Compute API
Launch priceBetter
Shader units / coresBetter
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Max monitors
Max resolution
USB Type-C
Length
Boost clockBetter
VRAMBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory busBetter
Memory bandwidthBetter
Interface
Power consumptionBetter
Process nodeBetter
Recommended PSUBetter
Die sizeBetter
Memory cache
Transistor countBetter
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares RX 7400 and R9 290 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
RX 7400R9 290
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
197 FPS
184 FPS
1080p Ultra
139 FPS
130 FPS
1440p Ultra
85 FPS
80 FPS
4K Ultra
27 FPS
28 FPS
Counter-Strike 2RX 7400197 FPSR9 290184 FPSRX 7400139 FPSR9 290130 FPSRX 740085 FPSR9 29080 FPSRX 740027 FPSR9 29028 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077RX 7400127 FPSR9 290119 FPSRX 7400110 FPSR9 290102 FPSRX 740062 FPSR9 29058 FPSRX 740018 FPSR9 29019 FPS
Forza Horizon 5RX 7400161 FPSR9 290150 FPSRX 7400104 FPSR9 29097 FPSRX 740077 FPSR9 29072 FPSRX 740040 FPSR9 29041 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyRX 7400104 FPSR9 29097 FPSRX 740087 FPSR9 29081 FPSRX 740055 FPSR9 29052 FPSRX 740018 FPSR9 29019 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10040385%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100504022%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100484311%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100685619%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001004674%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100534614%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100514513%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100484311%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100564815%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100484311%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12.212.0
Vulkan1.41.2
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingFSRNot supported
Compute APIOpenCL 2.2OpenCL 2.1
Architecture and release
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0BetterGCN 2.0
Process node6 nmBetter28 nm
Release date20252013
Device classDesktopDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count13300 millionBetter6200 million
Die size204 mm²Better438 mm²
Shader units / cores17922816Better
Base clock1452 MHzBetter947 MHz
Boost clock2300 MHzBetter947 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 4x8PCIe 3x16
LengthVaries by boardVaries by board
ThicknessDual-slotTriple-slot
Recommended PSU200 WBetter950 W
Power connector1x 6-pin6+8 pin
Display outputs and limits
HDMIHDMI 2.1aHDMI 1.4a
DisplayPortDisplayPort 2.1DisplayPort 1.2
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitors44
Max resolution7680 × 43204096 × 2160
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM8 GB GDDR6Better4 GB GDDR5
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Memory bus128 bit512 bitBetter
TFLOPS8Better5.632
Other comparisons
RTX 2070 SUPERNVIDIAReviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 70
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (4)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (4)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record changed: product_prices
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: RX 7400 or R9 290?+
RX 7400 has the higher overall gaming score, while R9 290 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
RX 7400 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
RX 7400 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
RX 7400 offers more overall performance, while RX 7400 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RX 7400 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
R9 290 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
RX 7400 leads in combined 1440p performance. RX 7400 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RX 7400 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
RX 7400 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
RX 7400 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to RX 7400 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.