AMD
Radeon RX 7600 vs GeForce 8800 Ultra
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
NVIDIA
8800 Ultra
Aggregate performance score
We've compared RX 7600 and 8800 Ultra across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗RX 7600 outperforms 8800 Ultra by 14% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+14%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.Radeon RX 7600 vs GeForce 8800 Ultra: key takeaway
The comparison of RX 7600 and 8800 Ultra shows a 14% advantage for RX 7600 in gaming performance, while 8800 Ultra may still be stronger in value for money. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMD
NVIDIAPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
4943
9984
82100
6817
COMPARISON RESULT
RX 7600 is the best overall choice
RX 7600 leads in combined game performance. 8800 Ultra offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
RX 7600 leads in the combined performance index
8800 Ultra costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 56–61of 317
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon RX 7600
121 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
GeForce 8800 Ultra
100/100 · Price $79The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
OVERALL SCORE
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
The Summary score section compares RX 7600 and 8800 Ultra with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
49Better
43
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
42Better
37
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
39Better
35
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
99Better
84
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
65Better
62
FULL COMPARISON
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
The Specifications section compares RX 7600 and 8800 Ultra with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
DisplayPortDisplayPort 2.1—
HDMIHDMI 2.1a—
Device classDesktopDesktop
UpscalingFSR—
DirectX12.210.0
Vulkan1.4—
OpenGL4.63.3
TFLOPS21.75Better0.387
Power consumption165 WBetter171 W
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR3
Power connector8 pin6+6 pin
Release date20232007
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0Tesla
ThicknessDual-slotDual-slot
Compute APIOpenCL 2.2OpenCL 1.0, CUDA 1.0
Launch price$549$79Better
Shader units / cores2048Better128
Clock speed1720 - 2655 MHzBetter612 MHz
Base clock1720 MHzBetter612 MHz
Boost clock2655 MHzBetter612 MHz
VRAM8 GB GDDR6768 MB GDDR3Better
Memory frequency18 GHzBetter2,2 GHz
Memory bus128 bit384 bitBetter
Memory bandwidth288 GB/sBetter106 GB/s
InterfacePCIe 4x8PCIe 1x16
Power consumption165 WBetter171 W
Process node6 nmBetter90 nm
Recommended PSU450 W450 W
Length204 mmBetter270 mm
Die size204 mm²Better484 mm²
Memory cacheL1 128 KB, L2 2 MBL2 0.1 MBBetter
Transistor count13300 millionBetter681 million
Max monitors43
Max resolution7680 × 43202560 × 1600
USB Type-CNoNo
GAME TEST BENCH
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares RX 7600 and 8800 Ultra across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
RX 76008800 Ultra
Verified H2HCommunity VerifiedEstimatedPredicted
Black Myth: Wukong
1080p High
28 FPSEstimated 66%
26 FPSEstimated 64%
1080p Ultra
23 FPSEstimated 66%
22 FPSEstimated 64%
1440p Ultra
16 FPSEstimated 64%
12 FPSEstimated 58%
4K Ultra
6 FPSEstimated 56%
5 FPSEstimated 55%
Black Myth: WukongRX 760028 FPSEstimated 66%8800 Ultra26 FPSEstimated 64%RX 760023 FPSEstimated 66%8800 Ultra22 FPSEstimated 64%RX 760016 FPSEstimated 64%8800 Ultra12 FPSEstimated 58%RX 76006 FPSEstimated 56%8800 Ultra5 FPSEstimated 55%
Call of Duty: WarzoneRX 760028 FPSEstimated 66%8800 Ultra26 FPSEstimated 64%RX 760023 FPSEstimated 66%8800 Ultra22 FPSEstimated 64%RX 760016 FPSEstimated 64%8800 Ultra12 FPSEstimated 58%RX 76006 FPSEstimated 56%8800 Ultra5 FPSEstimated 55%
Counter-Strike 2RX 7600232 FPSEstimated 74%8800 Ultra217 FPSEstimated 72%RX 7600163 FPSEstimated 74%8800 Ultra152 FPSEstimated 72%RX 7600117 FPSEstimated 72%8800 Ultra85 FPSEstimated 66%RX 760035 FPSEstimated 64%8800 Ultra32 FPSEstimated 63%
Cyberpunk 2077RX 7600150 FPSEstimated 74%8800 Ultra140 FPSEstimated 72%RX 7600129 FPSEstimated 74%8800 Ultra121 FPSEstimated 72%RX 760085 FPSEstimated 72%8800 Ultra62 FPSEstimated 66%RX 760023 FPSEstimated 64%8800 Ultra22 FPSEstimated 63%
Forza Horizon 5RX 7600189 FPSEstimated 80%8800 Ultra176 FPSEstimated 78%RX 7600122 FPSEstimated 74%8800 Ultra114 FPSEstimated 72%RX 7600105 FPSEstimated 72%8800 Ultra77 FPSEstimated 66%RX 760051 FPSEstimated 64%8800 Ultra47 FPSEstimated 63%
God of War RagnarökRX 760028 FPSEstimated 66%8800 Ultra26 FPSEstimated 64%RX 760023 FPSEstimated 66%8800 Ultra22 FPSEstimated 64%RX 760016 FPSEstimated 64%8800 Ultra12 FPSEstimated 58%RX 76006 FPSEstimated 56%8800 Ultra5 FPSEstimated 55%
Hogwarts LegacyRX 7600122 FPSEstimated 74%8800 Ultra114 FPSEstimated 72%RX 7600102 FPSEstimated 74%8800 Ultra96 FPSEstimated 72%RX 760076 FPSEstimated 72%8800 Ultra55 FPSEstimated 66%RX 760024 FPSEstimated 64%8800 Ultra22 FPSEstimated 63%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024RX 760028 FPSEstimated 66%8800 Ultra26 FPSEstimated 64%RX 760023 FPSEstimated 66%8800 Ultra22 FPSEstimated 64%RX 760016 FPSEstimated 64%8800 Ultra12 FPSEstimated 58%RX 76006 FPSEstimated 56%8800 Ultra5 FPSEstimated 55%
Monster Hunter WildsRX 760028 FPSEstimated 66%8800 Ultra26 FPSEstimated 64%RX 760023 FPSEstimated 66%8800 Ultra22 FPSEstimated 64%RX 760016 FPSEstimated 64%8800 Ultra12 FPSEstimated 58%RX 76006 FPSEstimated 56%8800 Ultra5 FPSEstimated 55%
StarfieldRX 760028 FPSEstimated 66%8800 Ultra26 FPSEstimated 64%RX 760023 FPSEstimated 66%8800 Ultra22 FPSEstimated 64%RX 760016 FPSEstimated 64%8800 Ultra12 FPSEstimated 58%RX 76006 FPSEstimated 56%8800 Ultra5 FPSEstimated 55%
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
The Benchmarks section compares RX 7600 and 8800 Ultra with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100494313%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100583647%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100543640%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 1006817120%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 100998416%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
The Detailed comparison section compares RX 7600 and 8800 Ultra with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100583161%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100573353%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100543640%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100602970%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100553544%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
The Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling section compares RX 7600 and 8800 Ultra with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
DirectX12.210.0
Vulkan1.4—
OpenGL4.63.3
UpscalingFSR—
Compute APIOpenCL 2.2OpenCL 1.0, CUDA 1.0
Architecture and release
The Architecture and release section compares RX 7600 and 8800 Ultra with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0Tesla
Process node6 nmBetter90 nm
Release date20232007
Device classDesktopDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
The Core layout and clocks section compares RX 7600 and 8800 Ultra with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
Transistor count13300 millionBetter681 million
Die size204 mm²Better484 mm²
Shader units / cores2048Better128
Base clock1720 MHzBetter612 MHz
Boost clock2655 MHzBetter612 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
The Form factor and compatibility section compares RX 7600 and 8800 Ultra with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
InterfacePCIe 4x8PCIe 1x16
Length204 mmBetter270 mm
ThicknessDual-slotDual-slot
Recommended PSU450 W450 W
Power connector8 pin6+6 pin
Display outputs and limits
The Display outputs section compares RX 7600 and 8800 Ultra with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
HDMIHDMI 2.1a—
DisplayPortDisplayPort 2.1—
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitors43
Max resolution7680 × 43202560 × 1600
Memory and compute throughput
The VRAM capacity and bandwidth section compares RX 7600 and 8800 Ultra with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
VRAM8 GB GDDR6768 MB GDDR3Better
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR3
Memory bus128 bit384 bitBetter
TFLOPS21.75Better0.387
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Other comparisons
Arc A310IntelReviews and questions
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: RX 7600 or 8800 Ultra?+
RX 7600 has the higher overall gaming score, while 8800 Ultra offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
8800 Ultra is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
8800 Ultra is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
RX 7600 offers more overall performance, while RX 7600 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
8800 Ultra is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
8800 Ultra is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
RX 7600 leads in combined 1440p performance. RX 7600 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RX 7600 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
RX 7600 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
RX 7600 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to RX 7600 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.