AMD
Radeon RX 7600 vs Radeon R9 295X2
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
AMD
R9 295X2
Aggregate performance score
We've compared RX 7600 and R9 295X2 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗RX 7600 outperforms R9 295X2 by ~20% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+20%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: Radeon RX 7600 (~43%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider RX 7600
- Higher catalog performance index
- Lower stated power consumption
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 2.2 · FSR
Reasons to consider R9 295X2
- Lower recorded market price
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 2.1 · Not supported
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMDPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
4941
9927
93100
6868
Graphics card ranking
Positions 48–53of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon R9 295X2
167 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Radeon RX 7600
Price $353.00Based on catalog performance per unit of current market price, not measured FPS.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
49Better
41
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
42Better
36
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
39Better
34
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
99Better
27
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
63Better
44
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
DisplayPort
HDMI
Device class
Upscaling
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Memory type
Power connector
Release date
ArchitectureBetter
Thickness
Compute API
Launch priceBetter
Shader units / coresBetter
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAM
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory busBetter
Memory bandwidthBetter
Interface
Power consumptionBetter
Process nodeBetter
Recommended PSUBetter
LengthBetter
Die sizeBetter
Memory cache
Transistor countBetter
Max monitors
Max resolution
USB Type-C
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares RX 7600 and R9 295X2 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
RX 7600R9 295X2
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
232 FPS
184 FPS
1080p Ultra
163 FPS
130 FPS
1440p Ultra
117 FPS
100 FPS
4K Ultra
35 FPS
33 FPS
Counter-Strike 2RX 7600232 FPSR9 295X2184 FPSRX 7600163 FPSR9 295X2130 FPSRX 7600117 FPSR9 295X2100 FPSRX 760035 FPSR9 295X233 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077RX 7600150 FPSR9 295X2119 FPSRX 7600129 FPSR9 295X2102 FPSRX 760085 FPSR9 295X272 FPSRX 760023 FPSR9 295X222 FPS
Forza Horizon 5RX 7600189 FPSR9 295X2150 FPSRX 7600122 FPSR9 295X297 FPSRX 7600105 FPSR9 295X290 FPSRX 760051 FPSR9 295X249 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyRX 7600122 FPSR9 295X297 FPSRX 7600102 FPSR9 295X281 FPSRX 760076 FPSR9 295X265 FPSRX 760024 FPSR9 295X223 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100494118%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100584427%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100544910%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 10068680%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1009927114%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10058539%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10057529%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100544910%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 10060567%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100554912%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12.212.0
Vulkan1.41.2
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingFSRNot supported
Compute APIOpenCL 2.2OpenCL 2.1
Architecture and release
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0BetterGCN 2.0
Process node6 nmBetter28 nm
Release date20232014
Device classDesktopDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count13300 millionBetter6200 million
Die size204 mm²Better438 mm²
Shader units / cores20482816Better
Base clock1720 MHzBetter1018 MHz
Boost clock2655 MHzBetter1018 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 4x8PCIe 3x16
Length204 mmBetter307 mm
ThicknessDual-slotDual-slot
Recommended PSU450 WBetter900 W
Power connector8 pin3x8 pin
Display outputs and limits
HDMIHDMI 2.1aBoard dependent
DisplayPortDisplayPort 2.1mini-DisplayPort 1.2
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitors45
Max resolution7680 × 43204096 × 2160
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM8 GB GDDR68 GB GDDR5
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Memory bus128 bit512x2 bitBetter
TFLOPS21.75Better5.733
Other comparisons
Arc B570Intel
RTX 4070NVIDIAReviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 70
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (6)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (3)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: RX 7600 or R9 295X2?+
RX 7600 has the higher overall gaming score, while R9 295X2 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
RX 7600 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
RX 7600 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
RX 7600 offers more overall performance, while RX 7600 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RX 7600 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
R9 295X2 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
RX 7600 leads in combined 1440p performance. RX 7600 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RX 7600 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
RX 7600 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
RX 7600 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to RX 7600 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.