AMD
Radeon RX 7600 XT vs Radeon Pro W6800
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
AMD
Pro W6800
Aggregate performance score
We've compared RX 7600 XT and Pro W6800 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗RX 7600 XT outperforms Pro W6800 by ~15% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+15%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: Radeon RX 7600 XT (~15%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider RX 7600 XT
- Lower stated power consumption
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 2.2 · FSR
Reasons to consider Pro W6800
- More graphics memory
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 2.1 · FSR
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMDPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
5454
9572
6851
88100
Graphics card ranking
Positions 29–34of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon RX 7600 XT
119 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Radeon RX 7600 XT
Price $317.00Based on catalog performance per unit of current market price, not measured FPS.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
54
54
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
45
45
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
43
43
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
95Better
72
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
60Better
52
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
DisplayPort
HDMI
Memory frequencyBetter
Device class
Upscaling
Max monitors
Max resolution
USB Type-C
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Memory type
Power connector
Release date
ArchitectureBetter
Thickness
Compute API
Launch priceBetter
Shader units / coresBetter
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAMBetter
Memory busBetter
Memory bandwidthBetter
Interface
Power consumptionBetter
Process nodeBetter
Recommended PSUBetter
LengthBetter
Die sizeBetter
Memory cache
Transistor countBetter
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares RX 7600 XT and Pro W6800 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
RX 7600 XTPro W6800
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
234 FPS
221 FPS
1080p Ultra
164 FPS
155 FPS
1440p Ultra
127 FPS
121 FPS
4K Ultra
48 FPS
60 FPS
Counter-Strike 2RX 7600 XT234 FPSPro W6800221 FPSRX 7600 XT164 FPSPro W6800155 FPSRX 7600 XT127 FPSPro W6800121 FPSRX 7600 XT48 FPSPro W680060 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077RX 7600 XT151 FPSPro W6800143 FPSRX 7600 XT130 FPSPro W6800123 FPSRX 7600 XT92 FPSPro W680088 FPSRX 7600 XT32 FPSPro W680040 FPS
Forza Horizon 5RX 7600 XT190 FPSPro W6800180 FPSRX 7600 XT123 FPSPro W6800117 FPSRX 7600 XT114 FPSPro W6800109 FPSRX 7600 XT71 FPSPro W680088 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyRX 7600 XT123 FPSPro W6800117 FPSRX 7600 XT103 FPSPro W680097 FPSRX 7600 XT83 FPSPro W680078 FPSRX 7600 XT33 FPSPro W680041 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10054540%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10065642%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10064675%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 1008810013%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 100957228%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10069758%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10068726%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10064675%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 10073798%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10064686%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingFSRFSR
Compute APIOpenCL 2.2OpenCL 2.1
Architecture and release
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0BetterRDNA 2.0
Process node6 nmBetter7 nm
Release date20242021
Device classDesktopProf
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count13300 million26800 millionBetter
Die size204 mm²Better520 mm²
Shader units / cores20483840Better
Base clock1720 MHz2075 MHzBetter
Boost clock2755 MHzBetter2320 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 4x8PCIe 4x16
Length204 mmBetter267 mm
ThicknessDual-slotDual-slot
Recommended PSU450 WBetter600 W
Power connector8 pin6+8 pin
Display outputs and limits
HDMIHDMI 2.1aHDMI 2.1
DisplayPortDisplayPort 2.1DisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitors46
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM16 GB GDDR632 GB GDDR6Better
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Memory bus128 bit256 bitBetter
TFLOPS22.57Better17.83
Other comparisons
RTX 4070 TiNVIDIA
Arc A750IntelReviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 70
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (5)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (4)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record changed: product_prices
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: RX 7600 XT or Pro W6800?+
RX 7600 XT has the higher overall gaming score, while RX 7600 XT offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
RX 7600 XT is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
RX 7600 XT is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
RX 7600 XT offers more overall performance, while RX 7600 XT offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RX 7600 XT is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
RX 7600 XT is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
RX 7600 XT leads in combined 1440p performance. RX 7600 XT can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RX 7600 XT is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
RX 7600 XT is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
RX 7600 XT is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to RX 7600 XT if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.