AMD
Radeon RX 7650 GRE vs Radeon R7 250X
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
AMD
R7 250X
Aggregate performance score
We've compared RX 7650 GRE and R7 250X across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗RX 7650 GRE outperforms R7 250X by ~58% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+58%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: Radeon RX 7650 GRE (~12%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider RX 7650 GRE
- Higher catalog performance index
- More graphics memory
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 2.2 · FSR
Reasons to consider R7 250X
- Lower stated power consumption
- Lower recorded market price
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 1.2 · Not supported
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMDPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
4931
96100
72100
6856
Graphics card ranking
Positions 75–80of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon RX 7650 GRE
112 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Radeon R7 250X
Price $20.00Based on catalog performance per unit of current market price, not measured FPS.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
49Better
31
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
42Better
29
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
39Better
26
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
96
100Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
58Better
52
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
DisplayPort
HDMI
Device class
Upscaling
Max monitors
Max resolution
USB Type-C
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
Power consumptionBetter
TFLOPSBetter
Memory type
Power connector
Release date
ArchitectureBetter
Thickness
Compute API
Launch priceBetter
Shader units / coresBetter
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAMBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory bus
Memory bandwidthBetter
Interface
Power consumptionBetter
Process nodeBetter
Recommended PSUBetter
LengthBetter
Die sizeBetter
Memory cache
Transistor countBetter
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares RX 7650 GRE and R7 250X across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
RX 7650 GRER7 250X
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
232 FPS
160 FPS
1080p Ultra
163 FPS
110 FPS
1440p Ultra
117 FPS
61 FPS
4K Ultra
35 FPS
21 FPS
Counter-Strike 2RX 7650 GRE232 FPSR7 250X160 FPSRX 7650 GRE163 FPSR7 250X110 FPSRX 7650 GRE117 FPSR7 250X61 FPSRX 7650 GRE35 FPSR7 250X21 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077RX 7650 GRE150 FPSR7 250X103 FPSRX 7650 GRE129 FPSR7 250X87 FPSRX 7650 GRE85 FPSR7 250X44 FPSRX 7650 GRE23 FPSR7 250X14 FPS
Forza Horizon 5RX 7650 GRE189 FPSR7 250X130 FPSRX 7650 GRE122 FPSR7 250X83 FPSRX 7650 GRE105 FPSR7 250X55 FPSRX 7650 GRE51 FPSR7 250X31 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyRX 7650 GRE122 FPSR7 250X84 FPSRX 7650 GRE102 FPSR7 250X69 FPSRX 7650 GRE76 FPSR7 250X39 FPSRX 7650 GRE24 FPSR7 250X15 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100493145%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100583549%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100543835%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100685619%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 100961004%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100584232%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100574133%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100543835%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100604529%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100553837%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12.211.1
Vulkan1.41.2
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingFSRNot supported
Compute APIOpenCL 2.2OpenCL 1.2
Architecture and release
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0BetterGCN 1.0
Process node6 nmBetter28 nm
Release date20252014
Device classDesktopDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count13300 millionBetter1500 million
Die size204 mm²123 mm²Better
Shader units / cores2048Better640
Base clock1720 MHzBetter950 MHz
Boost clock2695 MHzBetter950 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 4x8PCIe 3x16
Length204 mmBetter210 mm
ThicknessDual-slotDual-slot
Recommended PSU450 W250 WBetter
Power connector8 pin6 pin
Display outputs and limits
HDMIHDMI 2.1aHDMI 1.4a
DisplayPortDisplayPort 2.1mini-DisplayPort 1.2
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitors44
Max resolution7680 × 43204096 × 2160
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM8 GB GDDR6Better1 GB GDDR5
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Memory bus128 bit128 bit
TFLOPS22.08Better1.216
Other comparisons
RTX 2080 TiNVIDIAReviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 70
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (5)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (3)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: RX 7650 GRE or R7 250X?+
RX 7650 GRE has the higher overall gaming score, while R7 250X offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
RX 7650 GRE is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
RX 7650 GRE is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
RX 7650 GRE offers more overall performance, while RX 7650 GRE offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RX 7650 GRE is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
R7 250X is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
RX 7650 GRE leads in combined 1440p performance. RX 7650 GRE can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RX 7650 GRE is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
R7 250X is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
R7 250X is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to RX 7650 GRE if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.