AMD
Radeon RX 7700 vs Intel Arc 140T
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
Intel
Arc 140T
Aggregate performance score
We've compared RX 7700 and Arc 140T across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗Arc 140T outperforms RX 7700 by ~12% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+12%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Partially verifiedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 16Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: Radeon RX 7700 (~19%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider RX 7700
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 2.2 · FSR
Reasons to consider Arc 140T
- Higher catalog performance index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0 · Intel XeSS
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMD
IntelPerformance
6067
Graphics card ranking
Positions 25–30of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon RX 7700
109 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
60
67Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
50
55Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
47
52Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
50
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
68Better
57
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
DisplayPort
HDMI
Device class
Upscaling
Max resolution
USB Type-C
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
TFLOPS
Power consumption—
Memory type
Power connector
Release date
Architecture
Thickness
Compute API
Launch price—
Max monitors
Shader units / coresBetter
Clock speed
Base clock
Boost clockBetter
VRAM
Memory frequency
Memory bus
Memory bandwidth
Interface
Power consumption
Process node
Recommended PSU
Length
Die size
Memory cache
Transistor count
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares RX 7700 and Arc 140T across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
RX 7700Arc 140T
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
246 FPS
—
1080p Ultra
173 FPS
—
1440p Ultra
134 FPS
—
4K Ultra
67 FPS
—
Counter-Strike 2RX 7700246 FPSArc 140T—RX 7700173 FPSArc 140T—RX 7700134 FPSArc 140T—RX 770067 FPSArc 140T—
Cyberpunk 2077RX 7700159 FPSArc 140T—RX 7700137 FPSArc 140T—RX 770097 FPSArc 140T—RX 770045 FPSArc 140T—
Forza Horizon 5RX 7700200 FPSArc 140T—RX 7700130 FPSArc 140T—RX 7700121 FPSArc 140T—RX 770098 FPSArc 140T—
Hogwarts LegacyRX 7700130 FPSArc 140T—RX 7700108 FPSArc 140T—RX 770087 FPSArc 140T—RX 770046 FPSArc 140T—
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100606711%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10068691%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10068671%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100880200%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001000200%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10073679%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10071676%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10068671%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100756711%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10068671%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.4Not publicly specified
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingFSRIntel XeSS
Compute APIOpenCL 2.2OpenCL 3.0
Architecture and release
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0Xe-LPG
Process node5 nmNot publicly specified
Release date2025Q1'25
Device classDesktopMobile
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count28100 millionNot publicly specified
Die size346 mm²Not publicly specified
Shader units / cores2560Better8 Xe cores
Base clock1900 MHzNot publicly specified
Boost clock2600 MHzBetterUp to 2.35 GHz (depends on host processor)
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 4x16Integrated into processor package
Length267 mmNot applicable (integrated GPU)
ThicknessDual-slotNot applicable (integrated GPU)
Recommended PSU550 WSystem dependent
Power connector8 pinNot applicable (integrated GPU)
Display outputs and limits
HDMIHDMI 2.1aHDMI 2.1 FRL (OEM dependent)
DisplayPortDisplayPort 2.1DisplayPort 2.1 UHBR20 (OEM dependent)
USB Type-CYesOEM dependent
Max monitors44 (platform capability)
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (DisplayPort)
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM16 GB GDDR6Shared system memory; OEM configurable
Memory typeGDDR6Shared DDR5 / LPDDR5X
Memory bus256 bitDepends on system memory configuration
TFLOPS26.62Not publicly specified
Other comparisons
RTX 3080 12GBNVIDIAReviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 16
- Specifications
- 21 / 68
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (2)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (1)
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: RX 7700 or Arc 140T?+
RX 7700 has the higher overall gaming score, while RX 7700 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
RX 7700 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
RX 7700 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
RX 7700 offers more overall performance, while RX 7700 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RX 7700 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
RX 7700 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
RX 7700 leads in combined 1440p performance. RX 7700 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RX 7700 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
RX 7700 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
RX 7700 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to RX 7700 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.