Radeon RX 7900 GRE vs Radeon HD 6570

Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RX 7900 GRE and HD 6570 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 7900 GRE outperforms HD 6570 by ~126% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+126%

Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?

H2HBench Data Quality

Low confidence
Specifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026

Limited verified data

H2HBench Verdict

Higher catalog score: Radeon RX 7900 GRE (~33%)

The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.

Reasons to consider RX 7900 GRE

  • Higher catalog performance index
  • More graphics memory
  • Recorded feature support: OpenCL 2.2 · FSR

Reasons to consider HD 6570

  • Lower stated power consumption
  • Higher catalog value index
  • Recorded feature support: OpenCL 1.2 · Not supported
Low confidence

Catalog metrics radar

Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.

H2H
Performance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
Performance
7031
Efficiency
90100
Price / performance
60100
Memory capacity
8843
Missing values are never replaced with zero or an average.Model: H2H 2026.07 fixed scale.

Graphics card ranking

Full ranking →

The ranking is recalculated automatically from catalog data.

Positions 3–8of 321
RX 7900 GRE#5position in the GPU ranking
HD 6570not in TOP100position in the GPU ranking

Which should you choose?

Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.

COMMUNITY CHOICE

Radeon RX 7900 GRE

90 likes

Head to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.

BEST PRICE / PERFORMANCE

Radeon HD 6570

Price $19.00

Based on catalog performance per unit of current market price, not measured FPS.

Overview

Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.

CategoryRX 7900 GREHD 6570
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
70Better
31
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
57Better
29
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
54Better
26
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
90
100Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
69Better
52

Specifications

The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.

SpecificationRX 7900 GREHD 6570
DisplayPort
HDMI
Device class
Upscaling
Max monitors
Max resolution
USB Type-C
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Memory type
Power connector
Release date
ArchitectureBetter
Thickness
Compute API
Launch priceBetter
Shader units / coresBetter
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAMBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory busBetter
Memory bandwidthBetter
Interface
Power consumptionBetter
Process nodeBetter
Recommended PSUBetter
LengthBetter
Die sizeBetter
Memory cache
Transistor countBetter

Gaming FPS

Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.

The Gaming FPS section compares RX 7900 GRE and HD 6570 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.

RX 7900 GREHD 6570
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080p High
289 FPS
155 FPS
1080p Ultra
203 FPS
109 FPS
1440p Ultra
158 FPS
59 FPS
4K Ultra
79 FPS
21 FPS
Game1080p High1080p Ultra1440p Ultra4K Ultra
Counter-Strike 2RX 7900 GRE289 FPSHD 6570155 FPSRX 7900 GRE203 FPSHD 6570109 FPSRX 7900 GRE158 FPSHD 657059 FPSRX 7900 GRE79 FPSHD 657021 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077RX 7900 GRE187 FPSHD 6570100 FPSRX 7900 GRE161 FPSHD 657086 FPSRX 7900 GRE115 FPSHD 657043 FPSRX 7900 GRE53 FPSHD 657014 FPS
Forza Horizon 5RX 7900 GRE236 FPSHD 6570126 FPSRX 7900 GRE153 FPSHD 657082 FPSRX 7900 GRE142 FPSHD 657053 FPSRX 7900 GRE116 FPSHD 657031 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyRX 7900 GRE153 FPSHD 657082 FPSRX 7900 GRE128 FPSHD 657068 FPSRX 7900 GRE103 FPSHD 657038 FPSRX 7900 GRE54 FPSHD 657014 FPS
Average FPSRX 7900 GRE216 FPSHD 6570116 FPSRX 7900 GRE161 FPSHD 657086 FPSRX 7900 GRE130 FPSHD 657048 FPSRX 7900 GRE76 FPSHD 657020 FPS

H2H workload indices

Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.

IndexRX 7900 GREHD 6570Difference
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100703177%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100733181%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100753475%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100884369%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1009010011%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

H2H AI workload indices

Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.

IndexRX 7900 GREHD 6570Difference
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100783674%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100773673%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100753475%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100803871%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100753573%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling

SpecificationsRX 7900 GREHD 6570
DirectX12.211.0
Vulkan1.4Not supported
OpenGL4.64.4
UpscalingFSRNot supported
Compute APIOpenCL 2.2OpenCL 1.2

Architecture and release

SpecificationsRX 7900 GREHD 6570
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0BetterTeraScale 2
Process node5 nmBetter40 nm
Release date20232011
Device classDesktopDesktop

GPU cores, die and clocks

SpecificationsRX 7900 GREHD 6570
Transistor count57700 millionBetter716 million
Die size529 mm²118 mm²Better
Shader units / cores5120Better480
Base clock1500 MHzBetter650 MHz
Boost clock2245 MHzBetter650 MHz

Board size, power and compatibility

SpecificationsRX 7900 GREHD 6570
InterfacePCIe 4x16PCIe 2x16
Length276 mm168 mmBetter
ThicknessDual-slotSingle-slot
Recommended PSU600 W250 WBetter
Power connector8+8 pinNone

Display outputs and limits

SpecificationsRX 7900 GREHD 6570
HDMIHDMI 2.1aHDMI 1.3a
DisplayPortDisplayPort 2.1Board dependent
USB Type-CYesNo
Max monitors43
Max resolution7680 × 43202560 × 1600

Memory and compute throughput

SpecificationsRX 7900 GREHD 6570
VRAM16 GB GDDR6Better1 GB GDDR3
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR3
Memory bus256 bitBetter128 bit
TFLOPS45.98Better0.624

Other comparisons

6

Reviews and questions

Explain this comparison

Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.

Device ARX 7900 GRE69
Device BHD 657052
What AI will explain

Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.

Evidence details

Data coverage

Verified gaming results
0
Verified synthetic results
0
Games with verified results
0
Verified community results
0
Estimated / unverified results
32
Specifications
0 / 70

Specification record updated:

Benchmarks updated:

Price record updated:

Comparison reviewed:

Calculated scores · How is this calculated?

Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.

clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)
Price evidence · View sources (5)

Verified community results

No verified community benchmarks yet.

Reviewed by

No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.

Comparison history

Show recorded changes (5)
  1. · Record updated: products
  2. · Record updated: products
  3. · Record changed: product_prices
  4. · Record updated: products
  5. · Record updated: products

Why you can trust this comparison

Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.

Report incorrect data

Owner experiences

Real builds, results, and community feedback.

Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges

Frequently asked comparison questions

Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.

01Which is better for gaming: RX 7900 GRE or HD 6570?

RX 7900 GRE has the higher overall gaming score, while HD 6570 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.

02Which is better for streaming?

RX 7900 GRE is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.

03Which is better for Blender?

RX 7900 GRE is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.

04Which is better for video editing?

RX 7900 GRE offers more overall performance, while RX 7900 GRE offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.

05Which is better for neural networks and AI?

RX 7900 GRE is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.

06Which is better for 1080p?

HD 6570 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.

07Which is better for 1440p?

RX 7900 GRE leads in combined 1440p performance. RX 7900 GRE can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.

08Which is better for 4K?

RX 7900 GRE is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.

09Which is better for a quiet PC?

HD 6570 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.

10Which is better without replacing the power supply?

HD 6570 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.

11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?

Consider upgrading to RX 7900 GRE if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.