AMD
Radeon RX 7900 GRE vs Intel Arc 140V
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
Intel
Intel Arc 140V
Aggregate performance score
We've compared RX 7900 GRE and Intel Arc 140V across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗RX 7900 GRE outperforms Intel Arc 140V by ~84% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+84%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: Radeon RX 7900 GRE (~73%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider RX 7900 GRE
- Higher catalog performance index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 2.2 · FSR
Reasons to consider Intel Arc 140V
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0 · XeSS
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMD
IntelPerformance
Price / performance
7038
6065
Graphics card ranking
Positions 3–8of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon RX 7900 GRE
90 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
70Better
38
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
57Better
34
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
54Better
31
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
90Better
33
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
69Better
40
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
DisplayPort
HDMI
Device class
Upscaling
Max monitors
Max resolution
USB Type-C
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
TFLOPS
Power consumption—
Memory type
Power connector
Release date
ArchitectureBetter
Thickness
Compute API
Launch price—
Shader units / cores
Clock speed—
Base clock
Boost clock
VRAM
Memory frequency—
Memory bus
Memory bandwidth—
Interface
Power consumption—
Process node—
Recommended PSU
Length
Die size
Memory cache
Transistor count
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares RX 7900 GRE and Intel Arc 140V across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
RX 7900 GREIntel Arc 140V
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
289 FPS
157 FPS
1080p Ultra
203 FPS
111 FPS
1440p Ultra
158 FPS
86 FPS
4K Ultra
79 FPS
43 FPS
Counter-Strike 2RX 7900 GRE289 FPSIntel Arc 140V157 FPSRX 7900 GRE203 FPSIntel Arc 140V111 FPSRX 7900 GRE158 FPSIntel Arc 140V86 FPSRX 7900 GRE79 FPSIntel Arc 140V43 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077RX 7900 GRE187 FPSIntel Arc 140V102 FPSRX 7900 GRE161 FPSIntel Arc 140V88 FPSRX 7900 GRE115 FPSIntel Arc 140V62 FPSRX 7900 GRE53 FPSIntel Arc 140V29 FPS
Forza Horizon 5RX 7900 GRE236 FPSIntel Arc 140V128 FPSRX 7900 GRE153 FPSIntel Arc 140V83 FPSRX 7900 GRE142 FPSIntel Arc 140V77 FPSRX 7900 GRE116 FPSIntel Arc 140V63 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyRX 7900 GRE153 FPSIntel Arc 140V83 FPSRX 7900 GRE128 FPSIntel Arc 140V69 FPSRX 7900 GRE103 FPSIntel Arc 140V56 FPSRX 7900 GRE54 FPSIntel Arc 140V29 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100703859%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100733863%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100753865%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100880200%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 100900200%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100783869%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100773868%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100753865%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100803871%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100753865%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingFSRXeSS
Compute APIOpenCL 2.2OpenCL 3.0
Architecture and release
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0BetterXe2 LPG
Process node5 nm—
Release date20232024
Device classDesktopMobile
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count57700 millionNot publicly specified
Die size529 mm²Not publicly specified
Shader units / cores5120Not publicly specified
Base clock1500 MHzOEM/TGP dependent
Boost clock2245 MHzOEM/TGP dependent
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 4x16OEM platform dependent
Length276 mmOEM dependent
ThicknessDual-slotOEM dependent
Recommended PSU600 WOEM dependent
Power connector8+8 pinIntegrated laptop power
Display outputs and limits
HDMIHDMI 2.1aOEM dependent
DisplayPortDisplayPort 2.1OEM dependent
USB Type-CYesOEM dependent
Max monitors4OEM dependent
Max resolution7680 × 4320OEM dependent
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM16 GB GDDR6OEM configuration dependent
Memory typeGDDR6Shared LPDDR5X
Memory bus256 bitOEM configuration dependent
TFLOPS45.98OEM/TGP dependent
Other comparisons
RTX 4080 SUPERNVIDIAReviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 63
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (3)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (4)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record changed: product_prices
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: RX 7900 GRE or Intel Arc 140V?+
RX 7900 GRE has the higher overall gaming score, while Intel Arc 140V offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
RX 7900 GRE is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
RX 7900 GRE is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
RX 7900 GRE offers more overall performance, while RX 7900 GRE offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RX 7900 GRE is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Intel Arc 140V is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
RX 7900 GRE leads in combined 1440p performance. RX 7900 GRE can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RX 7900 GRE is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
RX 7900 GRE is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
RX 7900 GRE is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to RX 7900 GRE if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.