H2H

Radeon RX 7900 XT vs Radeon RX 550 4GB

Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RX 7900 XT and RX 550 4GB across specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 7900 XT outperforms RX 550 4GB by 128% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+128%

Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.
QUICK COMPARISON ANALYSIS

Radeon RX 7900 XT vs Radeon RX 550 4GB: key takeaway

The comparison of RX 7900 XT and RX 550 4GB shows a 128% advantage for RX 7900 XT in gaming performance, while RX 550 4GB may still be stronger in value for money. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.

SUMMARY PROFILE

Verified-metrics radar

Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.

H2H
Performance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
Performance
7332
Efficiency
77100
Price / performance
86100
Memory capacity
9556
Missing values are never replaced with zero or an average.Model: H2H 2026.07 fixed scale.
COMPARISON RESULT

RX 7900 XT is the best overall choice

RX 7900 XT leads in combined game performance. RX 550 4GB offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.

PERFORMANCE DIFFERENCE31%

RX 7900 XT leads in the combined performance index

PRICE DIFFERENCE$570

RX 550 4GB costs less

CATALOG POSITION

Graphics card ranking

Full ranking →

The ranking is recalculated automatically from catalog data.

Positions 6–11of 317
RX 7900 XT#8position in the GPU ranking
RX 550 4GBnot in TOP100position in the GPU ranking
COMPARISON VERDICT

Which should you choose?

Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.

COMMUNITY CHOICE

Radeon RX 7900 XT

114 likes

Head to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.

$/FPSBEST PRICE / FPS

Radeon RX 550 4GB

100/100 · Price $119

The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.

OVERALL SCORE

Overview

Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.

The Summary score section compares RX 7900 XT and RX 550 4GB with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

CategoryRX 7900 XTRX 550 4GB
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
73Better
32
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
59Better
29
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
57Better
27
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
77
100Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
76Better
58
FULL COMPARISON

Specifications

The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.

The Specifications section compares RX 7900 XT and RX 550 4GB with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationRX 7900 XTRX 550 4GB
DisplayPortDisplayPort 2.1DisplayPort 1.4
HDMIHDMI 2.1aHDMI 2.0b
Device classDesktopDesktop
UpscalingFSR
USB Type-CYesNo
DirectX12.212.0
Vulkan1.41.2
OpenGL4.64.6
TFLOPS51.48Better1.211
Power consumption315 W50 WBetter
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Power connector8+8 pin
Release date20222017
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0Polaris
ThicknessDual-slotVaries by board
Compute APIOpenCL 2.2
Launch price$899
Shader units / cores5376Better640
Clock speed1500 - 2400 MHzBetter1100 - 1183 MHz
Base clock1500 MHzBetter1100 MHz
Boost clock2400 MHzBetter1183 MHz
VRAM20 GB GDDR6Better4 GB GDDR5
Memory frequency20 GHzBetter7 GHz
Memory bus320 bitBetter128 bit
Memory bandwidth800 GB/sBetter112 GB/s
InterfacePCIe 4x16PCIe 3x8
Power consumption315 W50 WBetter
Process node5 nmBetter14 nm
Recommended PSU700 WVaries by board
Length276 mmVaries by board
Die size529 mm²103 mm²Better
Memory cacheL1 250 KB, L2 6 MBL1 16 KB, L2 0.5 MB
Transistor count57700 millionBetter2200 million
Max monitors4Varies by board
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320
GAME TEST BENCH

Gaming FPS

Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.

The Gaming FPS section compares RX 7900 XT and RX 550 4GB across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.

RX 7900 XTRX 550 4GB
Verified H2HCommunity VerifiedEstimatedPredicted
Black Myth: Wukong

Black Myth: Wukong

1080p High
36 FPSEstimated 66%
19 FPSEstimated 64%
1080p Ultra
31 FPSEstimated 66%
16 FPSEstimated 64%
1440p Ultra
23 FPSEstimated 66%
9 FPSEstimated 58%
4K Ultra
13 FPSEstimated 66%
5 FPSEstimated 55%
Game1080p High1080p Ultra1440p Ultra4K Ultra
Black Myth: WukongRX 7900 XT36 FPSEstimated 66%RX 550 4GB19 FPSEstimated 64%RX 7900 XT31 FPSEstimated 66%RX 550 4GB16 FPSEstimated 64%RX 7900 XT23 FPSEstimated 66%RX 550 4GB9 FPSEstimated 58%RX 7900 XT13 FPSEstimated 66%RX 550 4GB5 FPSEstimated 55%
Call of Duty: WarzoneRX 7900 XT36 FPSEstimated 66%RX 550 4GB19 FPSEstimated 64%RX 7900 XT31 FPSEstimated 66%RX 550 4GB16 FPSEstimated 64%RX 7900 XT23 FPSEstimated 66%RX 550 4GB9 FPSEstimated 58%RX 7900 XT13 FPSEstimated 66%RX 550 4GB5 FPSEstimated 55%
Counter-Strike 2RX 7900 XT305 FPSEstimated 74%RX 550 4GB162 FPSEstimated 72%RX 7900 XT214 FPSEstimated 74%RX 550 4GB112 FPSEstimated 72%RX 7900 XT166 FPSEstimated 74%RX 550 4GB62 FPSEstimated 66%RX 7900 XT83 FPSEstimated 74%RX 550 4GB22 FPSEstimated 62%
Cyberpunk 2077RX 7900 XT197 FPSEstimated 74%RX 550 4GB105 FPSEstimated 72%RX 7900 XT169 FPSEstimated 74%RX 550 4GB89 FPSEstimated 72%RX 7900 XT121 FPSEstimated 74%RX 550 4GB45 FPSEstimated 66%RX 7900 XT55 FPSEstimated 74%RX 550 4GB15 FPSEstimated 62%
Forza Horizon 5RX 7900 XT226 FPSEstimated 80%RX 550 4GB132 FPSEstimated 78%RX 7900 XT161 FPSEstimated 74%RX 550 4GB84 FPSEstimated 72%RX 7900 XT150 FPSEstimated 74%RX 550 4GB56 FPSEstimated 66%RX 7900 XT122 FPSEstimated 74%RX 550 4GB32 FPSEstimated 62%
God of War RagnarökRX 7900 XT36 FPSEstimated 66%RX 550 4GB19 FPSEstimated 64%RX 7900 XT31 FPSEstimated 66%RX 550 4GB16 FPSEstimated 64%RX 7900 XT23 FPSEstimated 66%RX 550 4GB9 FPSEstimated 58%RX 7900 XT13 FPSEstimated 66%RX 550 4GB5 FPSEstimated 55%
Hogwarts LegacyRX 7900 XT161 FPSEstimated 74%RX 550 4GB85 FPSEstimated 72%RX 7900 XT134 FPSEstimated 74%RX 550 4GB70 FPSEstimated 72%RX 7900 XT108 FPSEstimated 74%RX 550 4GB40 FPSEstimated 66%RX 7900 XT56 FPSEstimated 74%RX 550 4GB15 FPSEstimated 62%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024RX 7900 XT36 FPSEstimated 66%RX 550 4GB19 FPSEstimated 64%RX 7900 XT31 FPSEstimated 66%RX 550 4GB16 FPSEstimated 64%RX 7900 XT23 FPSEstimated 66%RX 550 4GB9 FPSEstimated 58%RX 7900 XT13 FPSEstimated 66%RX 550 4GB5 FPSEstimated 55%
Monster Hunter WildsRX 7900 XT36 FPSEstimated 66%RX 550 4GB19 FPSEstimated 64%RX 7900 XT31 FPSEstimated 66%RX 550 4GB16 FPSEstimated 64%RX 7900 XT23 FPSEstimated 66%RX 550 4GB9 FPSEstimated 58%RX 7900 XT13 FPSEstimated 66%RX 550 4GB5 FPSEstimated 55%
StarfieldRX 7900 XT36 FPSEstimated 66%RX 550 4GB19 FPSEstimated 64%RX 7900 XT31 FPSEstimated 66%RX 550 4GB16 FPSEstimated 64%RX 7900 XT23 FPSEstimated 66%RX 550 4GB9 FPSEstimated 58%RX 7900 XT13 FPSEstimated 66%RX 550 4GB5 FPSEstimated 55%
Average FPSRX 7900 XT111 FPSRX 550 4GB60 FPSRX 7900 XT86 FPSRX 550 4GB45 FPSRX 7900 XT68 FPSRX 550 4GB26 FPSRX 7900 XT39 FPSRX 550 4GB11 FPS
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H workload indices

Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.

The Benchmarks section compares RX 7900 XT and RX 550 4GB with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

IndexRX 7900 XTRX 550 4GBDifference
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100733278%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100773770%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100793968%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100955652%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1007710026%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H AI workload indices

Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.

The Detailed comparison section compares RX 7900 XT and RX 550 4GB with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

IndexRX 7900 XTRX 550 4GBDifference
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100834363%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100824167%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100793968%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100854562%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100793968%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling

The Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling section compares RX 7900 XT and RX 550 4GB with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRX 7900 XTRX 550 4GB
DirectX12.212.0
Vulkan1.41.2
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingFSR
Compute APIOpenCL 2.2

Architecture and release

The Architecture and release section compares RX 7900 XT and RX 550 4GB with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRX 7900 XTRX 550 4GB
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0Polaris
Process node5 nmBetter14 nm
Release date20222017
Device classDesktopDesktop

GPU cores, die and clocks

The Core layout and clocks section compares RX 7900 XT and RX 550 4GB with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRX 7900 XTRX 550 4GB
Transistor count57700 millionBetter2200 million
Die size529 mm²103 mm²Better
Shader units / cores5376Better640
Base clock1500 MHzBetter1100 MHz
Boost clock2400 MHzBetter1183 MHz

Board size, power and compatibility

The Form factor and compatibility section compares RX 7900 XT and RX 550 4GB with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRX 7900 XTRX 550 4GB
InterfacePCIe 4x16PCIe 3x8
Length276 mmVaries by board
ThicknessDual-slotVaries by board
Recommended PSU700 WVaries by board
Power connector8+8 pin

Display outputs and limits

The Display outputs section compares RX 7900 XT and RX 550 4GB with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRX 7900 XTRX 550 4GB
HDMIHDMI 2.1aHDMI 2.0b
DisplayPortDisplayPort 2.1DisplayPort 1.4
USB Type-CYesNo
Max monitors4Varies by board
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320

Memory and compute throughput

The VRAM capacity and bandwidth section compares RX 7900 XT and RX 550 4GB with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRX 7900 XTRX 550 4GB
VRAM20 GB GDDR6Better4 GB GDDR5
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Memory bus320 bitBetter128 bit
TFLOPS51.48Better1.211
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER

Other comparisons

6

Reviews and questions

AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD

Explain this comparison

Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.

Device ARX 7900 XT76
Device BRX 550 4GB58
What AI will explain

Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.

REAL CONFIGURATIONS

Owner experiences

Real builds, results, and community feedback.

Moderator reviewedHelpful to the community🏅Expert badges
FAQ · CHOOSE BY USE CASE

Frequently asked comparison questions

Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.

01Which is better for gaming: RX 7900 XT or RX 550 4GB?

RX 7900 XT has the higher overall gaming score, while RX 550 4GB offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.

02Which is better for streaming?

RX 7900 XT is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.

03Which is better for Blender?

RX 7900 XT is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.

04Which is better for video editing?

RX 7900 XT offers more overall performance, while RX 7900 XT offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.

05Which is better for neural networks and AI?

RX 7900 XT is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.

06Which is better for 1080p?

RX 550 4GB is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.

07Which is better for 1440p?

RX 7900 XT leads in combined 1440p performance. RX 7900 XT can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.

08Which is better for 4K?

RX 7900 XT is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.

09Which is better for a quiet PC?

RX 550 4GB is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.

10Which is better without replacing the power supply?

RX 550 4GB is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.

11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?

Consider upgrading to RX 7900 XT if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.