AMD
Radeon RX 9050 4 GB vs GeForce 930M
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
NVIDIA
GeForce 930M
Aggregate performance score
We've compared RX 9050 4 GB and GeForce 930M across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗RX 9050 4 GB outperforms GeForce 930M by ~60% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+60%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 16Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: Radeon RX 9050 4 GB (~29%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider RX 9050 4 GB
- Higher catalog performance index
- More graphics memory
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0 · FSR 4.1
Reasons to consider GeForce 930M
- Lower stated power consumption
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 5.0 · Not supported
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMD
NVIDIAPerformance
Efficiency
Memory capacity
4830
100100
6043
Graphics card ranking
Positions 120–125of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce 930M
140 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
48Better
30
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
41Better
28
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
39Better
26
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100
100
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
54Better
42
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Architecture
Device class
Release date
TFLOPSBetter
Shader units / coresBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
Clock speedBetter
VRAMBetter
Memory type
Memory bus
Memory bandwidthBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory cacheBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Recommended PSU
Power connector
Process nodeBetter
Transistor countBetter
Interface
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
Compute API
HDMI
DisplayPort
Upscaling
USB Type-C
Length
Thickness
Max monitors
Max resolution
Launch price—
Die size—
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares RX 9050 4 GB and GeForce 930M across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
RX 9050 4 GBGeForce 930M
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
—
150 FPS
1080p Ultra
—
106 FPS
1440p Ultra
—
57 FPS
4K Ultra
—
20 FPS
Counter-Strike 2RX 9050 4 GB—GeForce 930M150 FPSRX 9050 4 GB—GeForce 930M106 FPSRX 9050 4 GB—GeForce 930M57 FPSRX 9050 4 GB—GeForce 930M20 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077RX 9050 4 GB—GeForce 930M97 FPSRX 9050 4 GB—GeForce 930M84 FPSRX 9050 4 GB—GeForce 930M41 FPSRX 9050 4 GB—GeForce 930M14 FPS
Forza Horizon 5RX 9050 4 GB—GeForce 930M122 FPSRX 9050 4 GB—GeForce 930M79 FPSRX 9050 4 GB—GeForce 930M51 FPSRX 9050 4 GB—GeForce 930M30 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyRX 9050 4 GB—GeForce 930M79 FPSRX 9050 4 GB—GeForce 930M66 FPSRX 9050 4 GB—GeForce 930M37 FPSRX 9050 4 GB—GeForce 930M14 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100483046%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100563060%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100513440%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100604333%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001001000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100543640%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100533541%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100513440%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100553739%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100523442%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12 Ultimate11.0
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingFSR 4.1Not supported
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 5.0
Architecture and release
ArchitectureRDNA 4Maxwell
Process node4 nmBetter28 nm
Release date20262015
Device classDesktopMobile
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count29.7 billionBetter1020 million
Die size—77 mm²
Shader units / cores1024Better384
Base clock1920 MHzBetter549 MHz
Boost clock2600 MHzBetter549 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 5.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
LengthVaries by boardOEM dependent
ThicknessVaries by boardIGP
Recommended PSU450 WOEM dependent
Power connector8 pinNone
Display outputs and limits
HDMIHDMI 2.1bOEM dependent
DisplayPortDisplayPort 2.1aOEM dependent
USB Type-CNoOEM dependent
Max monitorsVaries by boardOEM dependent
Max resolution7680 x 4320Depends on host system
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM4 GB GDDR6Better2 GB DDR3
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5 / DDR3
Memory bus64 bit64 bit
TFLOPS10.6Better0.422
Other comparisons
Arc A380IntelReviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 16
- Specifications
- 0 / 68
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (1)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (1)
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: RX 9050 4 GB or GeForce 930M?+
RX 9050 4 GB has the higher overall gaming score, while GeForce 930M offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
GeForce 930M is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
GeForce 930M is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
RX 9050 4 GB offers more overall performance, while RX 9050 4 GB offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
GeForce 930M is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
GeForce 930M is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
RX 9050 4 GB leads in combined 1440p performance. RX 9050 4 GB can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RX 9050 4 GB is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
GeForce 930M is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
GeForce 930M is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to RX 9050 4 GB if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.