AMD
Radeon RX 9050 4 GB vs GeForce RTX 2070
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
NVIDIA
RTX 2070
Aggregate performance score
We've compared RX 9050 4 GB and RTX 2070 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗RX 9050 4 GB outperforms RTX 2070 by ~9% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+9%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 16Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: Radeon RX 9050 4 GB (~23%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider RX 9050 4 GB
- Higher catalog performance index
- Lower stated power consumption
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0 · FSR 4.1
Reasons to consider RTX 2070
- More graphics memory
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 7.5 · DLSS 2
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMD
NVIDIAPerformance
Efficiency
Memory capacity
4844
10079
6068
Graphics card ranking
Positions 88–93of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce RTX 2070
178 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
48Better
44
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
41Better
38
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
39Better
36
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
79
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
54Better
44
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Architecture
Device class
Release date
TFLOPSBetter
Shader units / coresBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
Clock speedBetter
VRAMBetter
Memory type
Memory busBetter
Memory bandwidthBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory cacheBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Recommended PSU
Power connector
Process nodeBetter
Transistor countBetter
Interface
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
Compute API
HDMI
DisplayPort
Upscaling
USB Type-C
Length
Thickness
Max monitors
Max resolution
Launch price
Die size—
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares RX 9050 4 GB and RTX 2070 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
RX 9050 4 GBRTX 2070
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
—
194 FPS
1080p Ultra
—
137 FPS
1440p Ultra
—
106 FPS
4K Ultra
—
39 FPS
Counter-Strike 2RX 9050 4 GB—RTX 2070194 FPSRX 9050 4 GB—RTX 2070137 FPSRX 9050 4 GB—RTX 2070106 FPSRX 9050 4 GB—RTX 207039 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077RX 9050 4 GB—RTX 2070125 FPSRX 9050 4 GB—RTX 2070108 FPSRX 9050 4 GB—RTX 207077 FPSRX 9050 4 GB—RTX 207026 FPS
Forza Horizon 5RX 9050 4 GB—RTX 2070158 FPSRX 9050 4 GB—RTX 2070103 FPSRX 9050 4 GB—RTX 207096 FPSRX 9050 4 GB—RTX 207058 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyRX 9050 4 GB—RTX 2070103 FPSRX 9050 4 GB—RTX 207086 FPSRX 9050 4 GB—RTX 207069 FPSRX 9050 4 GB—RTX 207027 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10048449%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100564913%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10051510%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100606813%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001007923%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10054552%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10053542%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10051510%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 10055574%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10052512%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12 Ultimate12.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingFSR 4.1DLSS 2
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 7.5
Architecture and release
ArchitectureRDNA 4Turing
Process node4 nmBetter12 nm
Release date20262018
Device classDesktopDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count29.7 billionBetter10800 million
Die size—445 mm²
Shader units / cores10242304Better
Base clock1920 MHzBetter1410 MHz
Boost clock2600 MHzBetter1620 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 5.0 x16PCIe 3x16
LengthVaries by board229 mm
ThicknessVaries by boardDual-slot
Recommended PSU450 W450 W
Power connector8 pin8 pin
Display outputs and limits
HDMIHDMI 2.1bHDMI 2.0
DisplayPortDisplayPort 2.1aDisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-CNoYes
Max monitorsVaries by board5
Max resolution7680 x 43207680 × 4320
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM4 GB GDDR68 GB GDDR6Better
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Memory bus64 bit256 bitBetter
TFLOPS10.6Better7.465
Other comparisons
Arc A380IntelReviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 16
- Specifications
- 0 / 69
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (2)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (3)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record changed: product_prices
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: RX 9050 4 GB or RTX 2070?+
RX 9050 4 GB has the higher overall gaming score, while RTX 2070 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
RTX 2070 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
RTX 2070 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
RX 9050 4 GB offers more overall performance, while RX 9050 4 GB offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RTX 2070 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
RTX 2070 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
RX 9050 4 GB leads in combined 1440p performance. RX 9050 4 GB can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RX 9050 4 GB is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
RX 9050 4 GB is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
RX 9050 4 GB is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to RX 9050 4 GB if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.