AMD
Radeon RX 9050 4 GB vs GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
NVIDIA
RTX 4070 SUPER
Aggregate performance score
We've compared RX 9050 4 GB and RTX 4070 SUPER across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗RTX 4070 SUPER outperforms RX 9050 4 GB by 47% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+47%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.Radeon RX 9050 4 GB vs GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER: key takeaway
The comparison of RX 9050 4 GB and RTX 4070 SUPER shows a 47% advantage for RTX 4070 SUPER in gaming performance, while RX 9050 4 GB may still be stronger in efficiency and feature set. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMD
NVIDIAPerformance
Efficiency
Memory capacity
4363
10095
6080
COMPARISON RESULT
RTX 4070 SUPER is the best overall choice
RTX 4070 SUPER leads in combined game performance. RTX 4070 SUPER offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
RTX 4070 SUPER leads in the combined performance index
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 36–41of 319
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
101 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
82/100 · Price $599The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
OVERALL SCORE
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
The Summary score section compares RX 9050 4 GB and RTX 4070 SUPER with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
43
63Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
37
52Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
35
49Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
95
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
59
73Better
FULL COMPARISON
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
The Specifications section compares RX 9050 4 GB and RTX 4070 SUPER with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
ArchitectureRDNA 4Ada Lovelace
Device classDesktopDesktop
Release date20262024
TFLOPS10.635.48Better
Shader units / cores10247168Better
Base clock1920 MHz1980 MHzBetter
Boost clock2600 MHzBetter2475 MHz
Clock speed1920 - 2600 MHz1980 - 2475 MHzBetter
VRAM4 GB GDDR612 GB GDDR6XBetter
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6X
Memory bus64 bit192 bitBetter
Memory bandwidth144 GB/s504 GB/sBetter
Memory frequency18 Gbps21 GHzBetter
Memory cache16 MBBetterL1 128 KB, L2 48 MB
Power consumption92 WBetter220 W
Power consumption92 WBetter220 W
Recommended PSU450 WBetter550 W
Power connector8 pin16 pin
Process node4 nmBetter5 nm
Transistor count29.7 billion35800 millionBetter
InterfacePCIe 5.0 x16PCIe 4x16
DirectX12 Ultimate12.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 8.9
HDMIHDMI 2.1bHDMI 2.1
DisplayPortDisplayPort 2.1aDisplayPort 1.4a
UpscalingFSR 4.1DLSS 3
USB Type-CNoNo
LengthVaries by board267 mm
ThicknessVaries by boardDual-slot
Max monitorsVaries by board4
Max resolution7680 x 43207680 × 4320
Launch priceOEM only - not announced$599
Die size—294 mm²
GAME TEST BENCH
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares RX 9050 4 GB and RTX 4070 SUPER across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
RX 9050 4 GBRTX 4070 SUPER
Verified H2HCommunity VerifiedEstimatedPredicted
Black Myth: Wukong
1080p High
—
31 FPSEstimated 66%
1080p Ultra
—
27 FPSEstimated 66%
1440p Ultra
—
20 FPSEstimated 66%
4K Ultra
—
11 FPSEstimated 65%
Black Myth: WukongRX 9050 4 GB—RTX 4070 SUPER31 FPSEstimated 66%RX 9050 4 GB—RTX 4070 SUPER27 FPSEstimated 66%RX 9050 4 GB—RTX 4070 SUPER20 FPSEstimated 66%RX 9050 4 GB—RTX 4070 SUPER11 FPSEstimated 65%
Call of Duty: WarzoneRX 9050 4 GB—RTX 4070 SUPER31 FPSEstimated 66%RX 9050 4 GB—RTX 4070 SUPER27 FPSEstimated 66%RX 9050 4 GB—RTX 4070 SUPER20 FPSEstimated 66%RX 9050 4 GB—RTX 4070 SUPER11 FPSEstimated 65%
Counter-Strike 2RX 9050 4 GB—RTX 4070 SUPER264 FPSEstimated 74%RX 9050 4 GB—RTX 4070 SUPER186 FPSEstimated 74%RX 9050 4 GB—RTX 4070 SUPER144 FPSEstimated 74%RX 9050 4 GB—RTX 4070 SUPER68 FPSEstimated 73%
Cyberpunk 2077RX 9050 4 GB—RTX 4070 SUPER171 FPSEstimated 74%RX 9050 4 GB—RTX 4070 SUPER147 FPSEstimated 74%RX 9050 4 GB—RTX 4070 SUPER105 FPSEstimated 74%RX 9050 4 GB—RTX 4070 SUPER46 FPSEstimated 73%
Forza Horizon 5RX 9050 4 GB—RTX 4070 SUPER215 FPSEstimated 80%RX 9050 4 GB—RTX 4070 SUPER139 FPSEstimated 74%RX 9050 4 GB—RTX 4070 SUPER130 FPSEstimated 74%RX 9050 4 GB—RTX 4070 SUPER100 FPSEstimated 73%
God of War RagnarökRX 9050 4 GB—RTX 4070 SUPER31 FPSEstimated 66%RX 9050 4 GB—RTX 4070 SUPER27 FPSEstimated 66%RX 9050 4 GB—RTX 4070 SUPER20 FPSEstimated 66%RX 9050 4 GB—RTX 4070 SUPER11 FPSEstimated 65%
Hogwarts LegacyRX 9050 4 GB—RTX 4070 SUPER139 FPSEstimated 74%RX 9050 4 GB—RTX 4070 SUPER117 FPSEstimated 74%RX 9050 4 GB—RTX 4070 SUPER94 FPSEstimated 74%RX 9050 4 GB—RTX 4070 SUPER46 FPSEstimated 73%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024RX 9050 4 GB—RTX 4070 SUPER31 FPSEstimated 66%RX 9050 4 GB—RTX 4070 SUPER27 FPSEstimated 66%RX 9050 4 GB—RTX 4070 SUPER20 FPSEstimated 66%RX 9050 4 GB—RTX 4070 SUPER11 FPSEstimated 65%
Monster Hunter WildsRX 9050 4 GB—RTX 4070 SUPER31 FPSEstimated 66%RX 9050 4 GB—RTX 4070 SUPER27 FPSEstimated 66%RX 9050 4 GB—RTX 4070 SUPER20 FPSEstimated 66%RX 9050 4 GB—RTX 4070 SUPER11 FPSEstimated 65%
StarfieldRX 9050 4 GB—RTX 4070 SUPER31 FPSEstimated 66%RX 9050 4 GB—RTX 4070 SUPER27 FPSEstimated 66%RX 9050 4 GB—RTX 4070 SUPER20 FPSEstimated 66%RX 9050 4 GB—RTX 4070 SUPER11 FPSEstimated 65%
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
The Benchmarks section compares RX 9050 4 GB and RTX 4070 SUPER with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100436338%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100526827%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100486834%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100608029%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 100100955%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
The Detailed comparison section compares RX 9050 4 GB and RTX 4070 SUPER with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100517133%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100507033%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100486834%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100537230%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100486834%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
The Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling section compares RX 9050 4 GB and RTX 4070 SUPER with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
DirectX12 Ultimate12.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingFSR 4.1DLSS 3
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 8.9
Architecture and release
The Architecture and release section compares RX 9050 4 GB and RTX 4070 SUPER with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
ArchitectureRDNA 4Ada Lovelace
Process node4 nmBetter5 nm
Release date20262024
Device classDesktopDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
The Core layout and clocks section compares RX 9050 4 GB and RTX 4070 SUPER with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
Transistor count29.7 billion35800 millionBetter
Die size—294 mm²
Shader units / cores10247168Better
Base clock1920 MHz1980 MHzBetter
Boost clock2600 MHzBetter2475 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
The Form factor and compatibility section compares RX 9050 4 GB and RTX 4070 SUPER with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
InterfacePCIe 5.0 x16PCIe 4x16
LengthVaries by board267 mm
ThicknessVaries by boardDual-slot
Recommended PSU450 WBetter550 W
Power connector8 pin16 pin
Display outputs and limits
The Display outputs section compares RX 9050 4 GB and RTX 4070 SUPER with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
HDMIHDMI 2.1bHDMI 2.1
DisplayPortDisplayPort 2.1aDisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitorsVaries by board4
Max resolution7680 x 43207680 × 4320
Memory and compute throughput
The VRAM capacity and bandwidth section compares RX 9050 4 GB and RTX 4070 SUPER with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
VRAM4 GB GDDR612 GB GDDR6XBetter
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6X
Memory bus64 bit192 bitBetter
TFLOPS10.635.48Better
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Other comparisons
Arc A310IntelReviews and questions
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: RX 9050 4 GB or RTX 4070 SUPER?+
RTX 4070 SUPER has the higher overall gaming score, while RTX 4070 SUPER offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
RTX 4070 SUPER is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
RTX 4070 SUPER is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
RTX 4070 SUPER offers more overall performance, while RX 9050 4 GB offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RTX 4070 SUPER is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
RTX 4070 SUPER is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
RTX 4070 SUPER leads in combined 1440p performance. RX 9050 4 GB can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RTX 4070 SUPER is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
RX 9050 4 GB is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
RX 9050 4 GB is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to RTX 4070 SUPER if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.