Radeon Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxxVSRadeon RX 9050
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERRadeon Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx+6%Better overall performance
AMD
Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx
VSWINNERNavi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx6%H2H overall index
AMD
RX 9050
Performance6353
Price / Performance10088
Data confidence3075
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMDAMDPerformance
Price / performance
6353
10088
COMMUNITY · VERIFIED DATA
Open streamer setups→Hardware used by streamers
Real public setups linked to each device.
AMDNavi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx0No verified public setup yet
AMDRX 90500No verified public setup yet
COMPARISON RESULT
Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx is the best overall choice
Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx leads in combined gaming performance. Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx leads in the combined performance index
Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 19–24of 723
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx
0 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Radeon Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx
100/100 · Price $89The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
OVERALL SCORE
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
63Better
53
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
52Better
45
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
49Better
42
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
65
100Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
72Better
68
FULL COMPARISON
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Clock speed400 - 2200 MHz1700 - 2600 MHzBetter
Base clock400 MHz1700 MHzBetter
Boost clock2200 MHz2600 MHzBetter
VRAM- SMA8 GB GDDR6
Memory typeSMAGDDR6
VRAM capacity-8 GB
Memory frequency-18 GHz
Memory bus-128 bit
Memory bandwidth—288 GB/s
InterfaceIGPPCIe 5x16
Power connector-8 pin
Power consumption-125 W
TDP-125 W
Process node6 nm4 nmBetter
Release date20222026Better
Architecture——
Recommended PSU——
Length——
Thickness——
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
DirectX——
Vulkan——
OpenGL——
Upscaling——
Compute API——
TFLOPS0.5618Better
Launch price——
Transistor count——
Die size——
Shader units / cores——
Memory cache——
Gaming FPS
Loading test-rig results…
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100635317%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10065608%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100635710%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100068200%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1000100200%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10063605%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10063597%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100635710%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 10063613%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10063588%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
Basic information
Architecture——
Process node6 nm4 nmBetter
Release date20222026Better
Launch price——
Detailed specifications
Transistor count——
Die size——
Shader units / cores——
Base clock400 MHz1700 MHzBetter
Boost clock2200 MHz2600 MHzBetter
Form factor and compatibility
InterfaceIGPPCIe 5x16
Length——
Thickness——
Recommended PSU——
Power connector-8 pin
VRAM capacity and type
VRAM- SMA8 GB GDDR6
Memory typeSMAGDDR6
Memory bus-128 bit
Memory bandwidth—288 GB/s
Memory cache——
Connectivity and outputs
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
API and SDK compatibility
DirectX——
Vulkan——
OpenGL——
Upscaling——
Compute API——
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Other comparisons
205NVIDIAReviews and questions
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx or RX 9050?+
Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx has the higher overall gaming score, while Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx offers more overall performance, while RX 9050 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RX 9050 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx leads in combined 1440p performance. RX 9050 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
RX 9050 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
RX 9050 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.