Radeon RX 9070 vs Radeon RX 460

Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 9070 and RX 460 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Radeon RX 9070 outperforms RX 460 by ~103% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+103%

Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?

H2HBench Data Quality

Low confidence
Specifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026

Limited verified data

H2HBench Verdict

Higher catalog score: Radeon RX 9070 (~35%)

The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.

Reasons to consider Radeon RX 9070

  • Higher catalog performance index
  • More graphics memory
  • Recorded feature support: OpenCL 2.2 · FSR

Reasons to consider RX 460

  • Lower stated power consumption
  • Lower recorded market price
  • Higher catalog value index
  • Recorded feature support: OpenCL 2.1 · Not supported
Low confidence

Catalog metrics radar

Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.

H2H
Performance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
Performance
6532
Efficiency
98100
Price / performance
74100
Memory capacity
8856
Missing values are never replaced with zero or an average.Model: H2H 2026.07 fixed scale.

Graphics card ranking

Full ranking →

The ranking is recalculated automatically from catalog data.

Positions 18–23of 321
Radeon RX 9070#20position in the GPU ranking
RX 460not in TOP100position in the GPU ranking

Which should you choose?

Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.

COMMUNITY CHOICE

Radeon RX 460

120 likes

Head to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.

BEST PRICE / PERFORMANCE

Radeon RX 460

Price $33.00

Based on catalog performance per unit of current market price, not measured FPS.

Overview

Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.

CategoryRadeon RX 9070RX 460
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
65Better
32
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
53Better
29
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
51Better
27
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
98
100Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
70Better
52

Specifications

The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.

SpecificationRadeon RX 9070RX 460
DisplayPort
HDMI
Device class
Upscaling
Length
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Memory type
Power connector
Release date
Architecture
Thickness
Compute API
Launch priceBetter
Shader units / coresBetter
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAMBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory busBetter
Memory bandwidthBetter
Interface
Power consumptionBetter
Process nodeBetter
Recommended PSUBetter
Die sizeBetter
Memory cacheBetter
Transistor countBetter
Max monitors
Max resolution
USB Type-C

Gaming FPS

Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.

The Gaming FPS section compares Radeon RX 9070 and RX 460 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.

Radeon RX 9070RX 460
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080p High
268 FPS
164 FPS
1080p Ultra
188 FPS
113 FPS
1440p Ultra
146 FPS
62 FPS
4K Ultra
73 FPS
22 FPS
Game1080p High1080p Ultra1440p Ultra4K Ultra
Counter-Strike 2Radeon RX 9070268 FPSRX 460164 FPSRadeon RX 9070188 FPSRX 460113 FPSRadeon RX 9070146 FPSRX 46062 FPSRadeon RX 907073 FPSRX 46022 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077Radeon RX 9070173 FPSRX 460106 FPSRadeon RX 9070149 FPSRX 46090 FPSRadeon RX 9070106 FPSRX 46045 FPSRadeon RX 907049 FPSRX 46015 FPS
Forza Horizon 5Radeon RX 9070218 FPSRX 460133 FPSRadeon RX 9070141 FPSRX 46085 FPSRadeon RX 9070132 FPSRX 46056 FPSRadeon RX 9070107 FPSRX 46032 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyRadeon RX 9070141 FPSRX 46086 FPSRadeon RX 9070118 FPSRX 46071 FPSRadeon RX 907095 FPSRX 46041 FPSRadeon RX 907050 FPSRX 46015 FPS
Average FPSRadeon RX 9070200 FPSRX 460122 FPSRadeon RX 9070149 FPSRX 46090 FPSRadeon RX 9070120 FPSRX 46051 FPSRadeon RX 907070 FPSRX 46021 FPS

H2H workload indices

Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.

IndexRadeon RX 9070RX 460Difference
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100653268%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100713763%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100713958%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100885644%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 100981002%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

H2H AI workload indices

Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.

IndexRadeon RX 9070RX 460Difference
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100754354%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100744157%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100713958%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100784554%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100723959%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling

SpecificationsRadeon RX 9070RX 460
DirectX12.212.0
Vulkan1.41.3
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingFSRNot supported
Compute APIOpenCL 2.2OpenCL 2.1

Architecture and release

SpecificationsRadeon RX 9070RX 460
ArchitectureRDNA 4.0GCN 4.0
Process node5 nmBetter14 nm
Release date20252016
Device classDesktopDesktop

GPU cores, die and clocks

SpecificationsRadeon RX 9070RX 460
Transistor count53900 millionBetter3000 million
Die size357 mm²123 mm²Better
Shader units / cores3072Better896
Base clock1330 MHzBetter1090 MHz
Boost clock2520 MHzBetter1200 MHz

Board size, power and compatibility

SpecificationsRadeon RX 9070RX 460
InterfacePCIe 5x16PCIe 3x8
LengthVaries by board170 mm
ThicknessDual-slotDual-slot
Recommended PSU550 W250 WBetter
Power connector8+8 pinNone

Display outputs and limits

SpecificationsRadeon RX 9070RX 460
HDMIHDMI 2.1bHDMI 2.0b
DisplayPortDisplayPort 2.1aDisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitors43
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320

Memory and compute throughput

SpecificationsRadeon RX 9070RX 460
VRAM16 GB GDDR6Better2 GB GDDR5
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Memory bus256 bitBetter128 bit
TFLOPS36.13Better2.15

Other comparisons

6

Reviews and questions

Explain this comparison

Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.

Device ARadeon RX 907070
Device BRX 46052
What AI will explain

Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.

Evidence details

Data coverage

Verified gaming results
0
Verified synthetic results
0
Games with verified results
0
Verified community results
0
Estimated / unverified results
32
Specifications
0 / 70

Specification record updated:

Benchmarks updated:

Price record updated:

Comparison reviewed:

Calculated scores · How is this calculated?

Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.

clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)
Price evidence · View sources (5)

Verified community results

No verified community benchmarks yet.

Reviewed by

No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.

Comparison history

Show recorded changes (3)
  1. · Record updated: products
  2. · Record updated: products
  3. · Record updated: products

Why you can trust this comparison

Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.

Report incorrect data

Owner experiences

Real builds, results, and community feedback.

Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges

Frequently asked comparison questions

Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.

01Which is better for gaming: Radeon RX 9070 or RX 460?

Radeon RX 9070 has the higher overall gaming score, while RX 460 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.

02Which is better for streaming?

Radeon RX 9070 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.

03Which is better for Blender?

Radeon RX 9070 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.

04Which is better for video editing?

Radeon RX 9070 offers more overall performance, while Radeon RX 9070 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.

05Which is better for neural networks and AI?

Radeon RX 9070 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.

06Which is better for 1080p?

RX 460 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.

07Which is better for 1440p?

Radeon RX 9070 leads in combined 1440p performance. Radeon RX 9070 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.

08Which is better for 4K?

Radeon RX 9070 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.

09Which is better for a quiet PC?

RX 460 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.

10Which is better without replacing the power supply?

RX 460 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.

11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?

Consider upgrading to Radeon RX 9070 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.