AMD
Radeon RX 9070 XT vs GeForce 510M
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
NVIDIA
GeForce 510M
Aggregate performance score
We've compared RX 9070 XT 16 GB and GeForce 510M across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗RX 9070 XT 16 GB outperforms GeForce 510M by ~92% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+92%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: Radeon RX 9070 XT (~80%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider RX 9070 XT 16 GB
- Higher catalog performance index
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 2.2 · FSR
Reasons to consider GeForce 510M
- Recorded feature support: CUDA / OpenCL · Not supported
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
Performance
Price / performance
7338
7265
Graphics card ranking
Positions 10–15of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon RX 9070 XT
144 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
73Better
38
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
59Better
34
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
57Better
31
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
80Better
33
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
72Better
40
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
DisplayPort
HDMI
Device class
Upscaling
USB Type-C
Power consumption—
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
TFLOPS
Memory type
Power connector
Release date
Architecture
Thickness
Compute API
Launch price—
Shader units / cores
Clock speed—
Base clock
Boost clock
VRAM
Memory frequency—
Memory bus
Memory bandwidth—
Interface
Power consumption—
Process nodeBetter
Recommended PSU
Die size
Memory cache
Transistor count
Max monitors
Max resolution
Length
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares RX 9070 XT 16 GB and GeForce 510M across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
RX 9070 XT 16 GBGeForce 510M
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
299 FPS
157 FPS
1080p Ultra
210 FPS
111 FPS
1440p Ultra
163 FPS
86 FPS
4K Ultra
81 FPS
43 FPS
Counter-Strike 2RX 9070 XT 16 GB299 FPSGeForce 510M157 FPSRX 9070 XT 16 GB210 FPSGeForce 510M111 FPSRX 9070 XT 16 GB163 FPSGeForce 510M86 FPSRX 9070 XT 16 GB81 FPSGeForce 510M43 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077RX 9070 XT 16 GB193 FPSGeForce 510M102 FPSRX 9070 XT 16 GB166 FPSGeForce 510M88 FPSRX 9070 XT 16 GB118 FPSGeForce 510M62 FPSRX 9070 XT 16 GB54 FPSGeForce 510M29 FPS
Forza Horizon 5RX 9070 XT 16 GB243 FPSGeForce 510M128 FPSRX 9070 XT 16 GB158 FPSGeForce 510M83 FPSRX 9070 XT 16 GB147 FPSGeForce 510M77 FPSRX 9070 XT 16 GB119 FPSGeForce 510M63 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyRX 9070 XT 16 GB158 FPSGeForce 510M83 FPSRX 9070 XT 16 GB132 FPSGeForce 510M69 FPSRX 9070 XT 16 GB106 FPSGeForce 510M56 FPSRX 9070 XT 16 GB55 FPSGeForce 510M29 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100733863%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100793870%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100773868%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100880200%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 100800200%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100803871%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100793870%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100773868%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100813872%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100783869%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12.211.0
Vulkan1.4Vulkan 1.2 (driver support)
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingFSRNot supported
Compute APIOpenCL 2.2CUDA / OpenCL
Architecture and release
ArchitectureRDNA 4.0Fermi
Process node5 nmBetterTSMC 40 nm
Release date20252011
Device classDesktopMobile
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count53900 millionNot publicly specified
Die size357 mm²Not publicly specified
Shader units / cores4096Not publicly specified
Base clock1660 MHzOEM/TGP dependent
Boost clock2970 MHzOEM/TGP dependent
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 5x16OEM platform dependent
LengthVaries by boardOEM dependent
ThicknessDual-slotOEM dependent
Recommended PSU700 WOEM dependent
Power connector8+8 pinIntegrated laptop power
Display outputs and limits
HDMIHDMI 2.1bOEM dependent
DisplayPortDisplayPort 2.1aOEM dependent
USB Type-CNoOEM dependent
Max monitors4OEM dependent
Max resolution7680 × 4320OEM dependent
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM16 GB GDDR6OEM configuration dependent
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5 / DDR3
Memory bus256 bitOEM configuration dependent
TFLOPS48.66OEM/TGP dependent
Other comparisons
Arc B580IntelVS
RX 9070 XT 16 GBAMDOpen comparison
RTX 4090NVIDIAVSRX 9070 XT 16 GBAMDOpen comparisonRX 9070 GRE 16GBAMDVSRX 9070 XT 16 GBAMDOpen comparisonRX 9070 XT 16 GBAMDVSRX 7900 XTXAMDOpen comparisonRX 9070 XT 16 GBAMDVSArc B770IntelOpen comparisonRX 9070 XT 16 GBAMDVSRadeon RX 9070AMDOpen comparisonReviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 64
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (3)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (2)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: RX 9070 XT 16 GB or GeForce 510M?+
RX 9070 XT 16 GB has the higher overall gaming score, while RX 9070 XT 16 GB offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
GeForce 510M is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
GeForce 510M is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
RX 9070 XT 16 GB offers more overall performance, while RX 9070 XT 16 GB offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
GeForce 510M is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
RX 9070 XT 16 GB is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
RX 9070 XT 16 GB leads in combined 1440p performance. RX 9070 XT 16 GB can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RX 9070 XT 16 GB is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
RX 9070 XT 16 GB is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
RX 9070 XT 16 GB is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to RX 9070 XT 16 GB if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.