AMD
Radeon RX 9070 XT vs GeForce GTX 260
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
NVIDIA
GTX 260
Aggregate performance score
We've compared RX 9070 XT 16 GB and GTX 260 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗RX 9070 XT 16 GB outperforms GTX 260 by ~62% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+62%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: Radeon RX 9070 XT (~24%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider RX 9070 XT 16 GB
- Higher catalog performance index
- More graphics memory
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 2.2 · FSR
Reasons to consider GTX 260
- Lower stated power consumption
- Lower recorded market price
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.3 · Not supported
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
Performance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
7345
8082
72100
8820
Graphics card ranking
Positions 10–15of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon RX 9070 XT
144 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
GeForce GTX 260
Price $26.00Based on catalog performance per unit of current market price, not measured FPS.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
73Better
45
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
59Better
39
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
57Better
36
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
80
82Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
72Better
58
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
DisplayPort
HDMI
Device class
Upscaling
USB Type-C
Power consumptionBetter
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
TFLOPSBetter
Memory type
Power connector
Release date
ArchitectureBetter
Thickness
Compute API
Launch priceBetter
Shader units / coresBetter
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAMBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory busBetter
Memory bandwidthBetter
Interface
Power consumptionBetter
Process nodeBetter
Recommended PSUBetter
Die sizeBetter
Memory cache
Transistor countBetter
Max monitors
Max resolution
Length
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares RX 9070 XT 16 GB and GTX 260 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
RX 9070 XT 16 GBGTX 260
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
299 FPS
227 FPS
1080p Ultra
210 FPS
160 FPS
1440p Ultra
163 FPS
89 FPS
4K Ultra
81 FPS
34 FPS
Counter-Strike 2RX 9070 XT 16 GB299 FPSGTX 260227 FPSRX 9070 XT 16 GB210 FPSGTX 260160 FPSRX 9070 XT 16 GB163 FPSGTX 26089 FPSRX 9070 XT 16 GB81 FPSGTX 26034 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077RX 9070 XT 16 GB193 FPSGTX 260147 FPSRX 9070 XT 16 GB166 FPSGTX 260126 FPSRX 9070 XT 16 GB118 FPSGTX 26065 FPSRX 9070 XT 16 GB54 FPSGTX 26023 FPS
Forza Horizon 5RX 9070 XT 16 GB243 FPSGTX 260185 FPSRX 9070 XT 16 GB158 FPSGTX 260120 FPSRX 9070 XT 16 GB147 FPSGTX 26081 FPSRX 9070 XT 16 GB119 FPSGTX 26050 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyRX 9070 XT 16 GB158 FPSGTX 260120 FPSRX 9070 XT 16 GB132 FPSGTX 260100 FPSRX 9070 XT 16 GB106 FPSGTX 26058 FPSRX 9070 XT 16 GB55 FPSGTX 26023 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100734547%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100793772%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100773868%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 1008820126%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 10080822%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100803481%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100793577%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100773868%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100813189%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100783771%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12.210.0
Vulkan1.4Not supported
OpenGL4.63.3
UpscalingFSRNot supported
Compute APIOpenCL 2.2OpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.3
Architecture and release
ArchitectureRDNA 4.0BetterTesla 2.0
Process node5 nmBetter65 nm
Release date20252008
Device classDesktopDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count53900 millionBetter1400 million
Die size357 mm²Better576 mm²
Shader units / cores4096Better192
Base clock1660 MHzBetter576 MHz
Boost clock2970 MHzBetter576 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 5x16PCIe 2x16
LengthVaries by board267 mm
ThicknessDual-slotDual-slot
Recommended PSU700 W450 WBetter
Power connector8+8 pin6+6 pin
Display outputs and limits
HDMIHDMI 2.1bBoard dependent
DisplayPortDisplayPort 2.1aBoard dependent
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitors43
Max resolution7680 × 43202560 × 1600
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM16 GB GDDR6896 MB GDDR3Better
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR3
Memory bus256 bit448 bitBetter
TFLOPS48.66Better0.477
Other comparisons
Arc B580IntelVS
RX 9070 XT 16 GBAMDOpen comparison
RTX 4090NVIDIAVSRX 9070 XT 16 GBAMDOpen comparisonRX 9070 GRE 16GBAMDVSRX 9070 XT 16 GBAMDOpen comparisonRX 9070 XT 16 GBAMDVSRX 7900 XTXAMDOpen comparisonRX 9070 XT 16 GBAMDVSArc B770IntelOpen comparisonRX 9070 XT 16 GBAMDVSRadeon RX 9070AMDOpen comparisonReviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 70
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (5)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (3)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: RX 9070 XT 16 GB or GTX 260?+
RX 9070 XT 16 GB has the higher overall gaming score, while GTX 260 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
GTX 260 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
GTX 260 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
RX 9070 XT 16 GB offers more overall performance, while RX 9070 XT 16 GB offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
GTX 260 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
GTX 260 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
RX 9070 XT 16 GB leads in combined 1440p performance. RX 9070 XT 16 GB can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RX 9070 XT 16 GB is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
GTX 260 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
GTX 260 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to RX 9070 XT 16 GB if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.