AMD
Radeon Vega II 8CU 4700G vs Radeon RX 590
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
AMD
RX 590
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Vega II 8CU 4700G and RX 590 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗Vega II 8CU 4700G outperforms RX 590 by 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+10%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.Radeon Vega II 8CU 4700G vs Radeon RX 590: key takeaway
The comparison of Vega II 8CU 4700G and RX 590 shows a 10% advantage for Vega II 8CU 4700G in gaming performance, while RX 590 may still be stronger in efficiency and feature set. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMDPerformance
Price / performance
4541
100100
COMPARISON RESULT
Vega II 8CU 4700G is the best overall choice
Vega II 8CU 4700G leads in combined game performance. Vega II 8CU 4700G offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
Vega II 8CU 4700G leads in the combined performance index
RX 590 costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 197–202of 319
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon Vega II 8CU 4700G
158 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Radeon Vega II 8CU 4700G
100/100 · Price $169The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
OVERALL SCORE
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
The Summary score section compares Vega II 8CU 4700G and RX 590 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
45Better
41
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
39Better
36
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
36Better
34
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
51
61Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
58Better
56
FULL COMPARISON
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
The Specifications section compares Vega II 8CU 4700G and RX 590 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4aDisplayPort 1.4a
HDMIHDMI 2.1HDMI 2.0b
Device classDesktopDesktop
DirectX12.212.0
Vulkan1.21.3
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingFSRAMD FidelityFX Super Resolution (FSR)
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0OpenCL 2.1
Recommended PSUVaries by board450 W
LengthVaries by board241 mm
ThicknessVaries by boardDual-slot
ArchitectureNot publicly specifiedGCN 4.0
Power consumption—225 W
TFLOPS2.17.119Better
VRAM- SMA8 GB GDDR5
Memory typeSMAGDDR5
Memory frequency—8 GHz
Memory bandwidth—256 GB/s
InterfaceIGPPCIe 3x16
Power consumption—225 W
Release date20202018
USB Type-CNoNo
Launch price—$309
Clock speed400 - 2100 MHz1469 - 1545 MHzBetter
Base clock400 MHz1469 MHzBetter
Boost clock2100 MHzBetter1545 MHz
Process node7 nmBetter12 nm
Max monitors44
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320
Transistor countNot publicly specified5700 million
Die sizeNot publicly specified232 mm²
Shader units / coresNot publicly specified2304
Memory cacheNot publicly specifiedL1 16 KB, L2 2 MB
Memory busSystem memory interface256 bit
Power connectorIntegrated (shared power)8 pin
GAME TEST BENCH
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares Vega II 8CU 4700G and RX 590 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
Vega II 8CU 4700GRX 590
Verified H2HCommunity VerifiedEstimatedPredicted
Black Myth: Wukong
1080p High
22 FPSEstimated 66%
23 FPSEstimated 66%
1080p Ultra
19 FPSEstimated 66%
19 FPSEstimated 66%
1440p Ultra
14 FPSEstimated 66%
13 FPSEstimated 64%
4K Ultra
8 FPSEstimated 66%
5 FPSEstimated 57%
Black Myth: WukongVega II 8CU 4700G22 FPSEstimated 66%RX 59023 FPSEstimated 66%Vega II 8CU 4700G19 FPSEstimated 66%RX 59019 FPSEstimated 66%Vega II 8CU 4700G14 FPSEstimated 66%RX 59013 FPSEstimated 64%Vega II 8CU 4700G8 FPSEstimated 66%RX 5905 FPSEstimated 57%
Call of Duty: WarzoneVega II 8CU 4700G22 FPSEstimated 66%RX 59023 FPSEstimated 66%Vega II 8CU 4700G19 FPSEstimated 66%RX 59019 FPSEstimated 66%Vega II 8CU 4700G14 FPSEstimated 66%RX 59013 FPSEstimated 64%Vega II 8CU 4700G8 FPSEstimated 66%RX 5905 FPSEstimated 57%
Counter-Strike 2Vega II 8CU 4700G185 FPSEstimated 74%RX 590191 FPSEstimated 74%Vega II 8CU 4700G130 FPSEstimated 74%RX 590134 FPSEstimated 74%Vega II 8CU 4700G101 FPSEstimated 74%RX 59097 FPSEstimated 72%Vega II 8CU 4700G50 FPSEstimated 74%RX 59032 FPSEstimated 65%
Cyberpunk 2077Vega II 8CU 4700G119 FPSEstimated 74%RX 590123 FPSEstimated 74%Vega II 8CU 4700G103 FPSEstimated 74%RX 590106 FPSEstimated 74%Vega II 8CU 4700G73 FPSEstimated 74%RX 59070 FPSEstimated 72%Vega II 8CU 4700G34 FPSEstimated 74%RX 59021 FPSEstimated 65%
Forza Horizon 5Vega II 8CU 4700G150 FPSEstimated 80%RX 590155 FPSEstimated 80%Vega II 8CU 4700G97 FPSEstimated 74%RX 590101 FPSEstimated 74%Vega II 8CU 4700G91 FPSEstimated 74%RX 59087 FPSEstimated 72%Vega II 8CU 4700G74 FPSEstimated 74%RX 59046 FPSEstimated 65%
God of War RagnarökVega II 8CU 4700G22 FPSEstimated 66%RX 59023 FPSEstimated 66%Vega II 8CU 4700G19 FPSEstimated 66%RX 59019 FPSEstimated 66%Vega II 8CU 4700G14 FPSEstimated 66%RX 59013 FPSEstimated 64%Vega II 8CU 4700G8 FPSEstimated 66%RX 5905 FPSEstimated 57%
Hogwarts LegacyVega II 8CU 4700G97 FPSEstimated 74%RX 590101 FPSEstimated 74%Vega II 8CU 4700G81 FPSEstimated 74%RX 59084 FPSEstimated 74%Vega II 8CU 4700G65 FPSEstimated 74%RX 59063 FPSEstimated 72%Vega II 8CU 4700G34 FPSEstimated 74%RX 59022 FPSEstimated 65%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024Vega II 8CU 4700G22 FPSEstimated 66%RX 59023 FPSEstimated 66%Vega II 8CU 4700G19 FPSEstimated 66%RX 59019 FPSEstimated 66%Vega II 8CU 4700G14 FPSEstimated 66%RX 59013 FPSEstimated 64%Vega II 8CU 4700G8 FPSEstimated 66%RX 5905 FPSEstimated 57%
Monster Hunter WildsVega II 8CU 4700G22 FPSEstimated 66%RX 59023 FPSEstimated 66%Vega II 8CU 4700G19 FPSEstimated 66%RX 59019 FPSEstimated 66%Vega II 8CU 4700G14 FPSEstimated 66%RX 59013 FPSEstimated 64%Vega II 8CU 4700G8 FPSEstimated 66%RX 5905 FPSEstimated 57%
StarfieldVega II 8CU 4700G22 FPSEstimated 66%RX 59023 FPSEstimated 66%Vega II 8CU 4700G19 FPSEstimated 66%RX 59019 FPSEstimated 66%Vega II 8CU 4700G14 FPSEstimated 66%RX 59013 FPSEstimated 64%Vega II 8CU 4700G8 FPSEstimated 66%RX 5905 FPSEstimated 57%
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
The Benchmarks section compares Vega II 8CU 4700G and RX 590 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10045419%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10049474%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10045499%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100068200%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 100061200%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
The Detailed comparison section compares Vega II 8CU 4700G and RX 590 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100455316%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100455214%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10045499%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100455622%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10045499%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
The Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling section compares Vega II 8CU 4700G and RX 590 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
DirectX12.212.0
Vulkan1.21.3
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingFSRAMD FidelityFX Super Resolution (FSR)
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0OpenCL 2.1
Architecture and release
The Architecture and release section compares Vega II 8CU 4700G and RX 590 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
ArchitectureNot publicly specifiedGCN 4.0
Process node7 nmBetter12 nm
Release date20202018
Device classDesktopDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
The Core layout and clocks section compares Vega II 8CU 4700G and RX 590 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
Transistor countNot publicly specified5700 million
Die sizeNot publicly specified232 mm²
Shader units / coresNot publicly specified2304
Base clock400 MHz1469 MHzBetter
Boost clock2100 MHzBetter1545 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
The Form factor and compatibility section compares Vega II 8CU 4700G and RX 590 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
InterfaceIGPPCIe 3x16
LengthVaries by board241 mm
ThicknessVaries by boardDual-slot
Recommended PSUVaries by board450 W
Power connectorIntegrated (shared power)8 pin
Display outputs and limits
The Display outputs section compares Vega II 8CU 4700G and RX 590 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
HDMIHDMI 2.1HDMI 2.0b
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4aDisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitors44
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320
Memory and compute throughput
The VRAM capacity and bandwidth section compares Vega II 8CU 4700G and RX 590 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
VRAM- SMA8 GB GDDR5
Memory typeSMAGDDR5
Memory busSystem memory interface256 bit
TFLOPS2.17.119Better
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Other comparisons
Arc A310Intel
GTX 1050 3GBNVIDIAReviews and questions
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Vega II 8CU 4700G or RX 590?+
Vega II 8CU 4700G has the higher overall gaming score, while Vega II 8CU 4700G offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
Vega II 8CU 4700G is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
Vega II 8CU 4700G is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Vega II 8CU 4700G offers more overall performance, while Vega II 8CU 4700G offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
Vega II 8CU 4700G is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Vega II 8CU 4700G is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Vega II 8CU 4700G leads in combined 1440p performance. Vega II 8CU 4700G can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Vega II 8CU 4700G is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
RX 590 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
RX 590 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Vega II 8CU 4700G if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.