AMD
Radeon VII vs GeForce 210
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
NVIDIA
210
Aggregate performance score
We've compared VII and 210 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗VII outperforms 210 by 68% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+68%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.Radeon VII vs GeForce 210: key takeaway
The comparison of VII and 210 shows a 68% advantage for VII in gaming performance, while 210 may still be stronger in efficiency and feature set. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMD
NVIDIAPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
5231
59100
100100
8843
COMPARISON RESULT
VII is the best overall choice
VII leads in combined game performance. VII offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
VII leads in the combined performance index
210 costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 79–84of 317
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon VII
121 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
GeForce 210
100/100 · Price $79The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
OVERALL SCORE
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
The Summary score section compares VII and 210 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
52Better
31
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
44Better
29
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
41Better
26
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
59
100Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
63Better
57
FULL COMPARISON
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
The Specifications section compares VII and 210 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
Power consumption295 W31 WBetter
Process node7 nmBetter40 nm
Recommended PSU600 W200 WBetter
Length280 mm168 mmBetter
Die size331 mm²57 mm²Better
Memory cacheL1 16 KB, L2 4 MBL2 0.03 MBBetter
Transistor count13230 millionBetter260 million
Max monitors43
Max resolution7680 × 43204096 × 2160
USB Type-CNoNo
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4aDisplayPort
HDMIHDMI 2.0b—
Device classDesktopDesktop
DirectX12.110.1
Vulkan1.3—
OpenGL4.63.3
TFLOPS13.44Better0.039
Power consumption295 W31 WBetter
Memory typeHBM2DDR3
Power connector8+8 pinNone
Release date20192009
ArchitectureGCN 5.1BetterTesla 2.0
ThicknessDual-slotSingle-slot
Upscaling——
Compute APIOpenCL 2.1OpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.2
Launch price$399$79Better
Shader units / cores3840Better16
Clock speed1400 - 1800 MHzBetter589 MHz
Base clock1400 MHzBetter589 MHz
Boost clock1800 MHzBetter589 MHz
VRAM16 GB HBM2Better1 GB DDR3
Memory frequency2 GHzBetter1,2 GHz
Memory bus4096 bitBetter64 bit
Memory bandwidth1024 GB/sBetter10 GB/s
InterfacePCIe 3x16PCIe 2x16
GAME TEST BENCH
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares VII and 210 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
VII210
Verified H2HCommunity VerifiedEstimatedPredicted
Black Myth: Wukong
1080p High
25 FPSEstimated 66%
18 FPSEstimated 64%
1080p Ultra
22 FPSEstimated 66%
16 FPSEstimated 64%
1440p Ultra
16 FPSEstimated 66%
8 FPSEstimated 58%
4K Ultra
9 FPSEstimated 66%
5 FPSEstimated 55%
Black Myth: WukongVII25 FPSEstimated 66%21018 FPSEstimated 64%VII22 FPSEstimated 66%21016 FPSEstimated 64%VII16 FPSEstimated 66%2108 FPSEstimated 58%VII9 FPSEstimated 66%2105 FPSEstimated 55%
Call of Duty: WarzoneVII25 FPSEstimated 66%21018 FPSEstimated 64%VII22 FPSEstimated 66%21016 FPSEstimated 64%VII16 FPSEstimated 66%2108 FPSEstimated 58%VII9 FPSEstimated 66%2105 FPSEstimated 55%
Counter-Strike 2VII213 FPSEstimated 74%210154 FPSEstimated 72%VII150 FPSEstimated 74%210108 FPSEstimated 72%VII117 FPSEstimated 74%21058 FPSEstimated 66%VII58 FPSEstimated 74%21021 FPSEstimated 62%
Cyberpunk 2077VII138 FPSEstimated 74%210100 FPSEstimated 72%VII119 FPSEstimated 74%21086 FPSEstimated 72%VII85 FPSEstimated 74%21042 FPSEstimated 66%VII39 FPSEstimated 74%21014 FPSEstimated 62%
Forza Horizon 5VII174 FPSEstimated 80%210126 FPSEstimated 78%VII112 FPSEstimated 74%21081 FPSEstimated 72%VII105 FPSEstimated 74%21052 FPSEstimated 66%VII85 FPSEstimated 74%21031 FPSEstimated 62%
God of War RagnarökVII25 FPSEstimated 66%21018 FPSEstimated 64%VII22 FPSEstimated 66%21016 FPSEstimated 64%VII16 FPSEstimated 66%2108 FPSEstimated 58%VII9 FPSEstimated 66%2105 FPSEstimated 55%
Hogwarts LegacyVII112 FPSEstimated 74%21081 FPSEstimated 72%VII94 FPSEstimated 74%21068 FPSEstimated 72%VII76 FPSEstimated 74%21038 FPSEstimated 66%VII40 FPSEstimated 74%21014 FPSEstimated 62%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024VII25 FPSEstimated 66%21018 FPSEstimated 64%VII22 FPSEstimated 66%21016 FPSEstimated 64%VII16 FPSEstimated 66%2108 FPSEstimated 58%VII9 FPSEstimated 66%2105 FPSEstimated 55%
Monster Hunter WildsVII25 FPSEstimated 66%21018 FPSEstimated 64%VII22 FPSEstimated 66%21016 FPSEstimated 64%VII16 FPSEstimated 66%2108 FPSEstimated 58%VII9 FPSEstimated 66%2105 FPSEstimated 55%
StarfieldVII25 FPSEstimated 66%21018 FPSEstimated 64%VII22 FPSEstimated 66%21016 FPSEstimated 64%VII16 FPSEstimated 66%2108 FPSEstimated 58%VII9 FPSEstimated 66%2105 FPSEstimated 55%
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
The Benchmarks section compares VII and 210 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100523151%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100593162%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100623458%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100884369%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1005910052%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
The Detailed comparison section compares VII and 210 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100683662%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100663659%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100623458%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100723862%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100633557%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
The Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling section compares VII and 210 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
DirectX12.110.1
Vulkan1.3—
OpenGL4.63.3
Upscaling——
Compute APIOpenCL 2.1OpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.2
Architecture and release
The Architecture and release section compares VII and 210 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
ArchitectureGCN 5.1BetterTesla 2.0
Process node7 nmBetter40 nm
Release date20192009
Device classDesktopDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
The Core layout and clocks section compares VII and 210 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
Transistor count13230 millionBetter260 million
Die size331 mm²57 mm²Better
Shader units / cores3840Better16
Base clock1400 MHzBetter589 MHz
Boost clock1800 MHzBetter589 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
The Form factor and compatibility section compares VII and 210 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
InterfacePCIe 3x16PCIe 2x16
Length280 mm168 mmBetter
ThicknessDual-slotSingle-slot
Recommended PSU600 W200 WBetter
Power connector8+8 pinNone
Display outputs and limits
The Display outputs section compares VII and 210 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
HDMIHDMI 2.0b—
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4aDisplayPort
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitors43
Max resolution7680 × 43204096 × 2160
Memory and compute throughput
The VRAM capacity and bandwidth section compares VII and 210 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
VRAM16 GB HBM2Better1 GB DDR3
Memory typeHBM2DDR3
Memory bus4096 bitBetter64 bit
TFLOPS13.44Better0.039
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Other comparisons
Arc A310IntelReviews and questions
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: VII or 210?+
VII has the higher overall gaming score, while VII offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
210 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
210 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
VII offers more overall performance, while VII offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
210 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
VII is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
VII leads in combined 1440p performance. VII can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
VII is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
210 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
210 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to VII if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.