AMD
Radeon VII vs Quadro NVS 315
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
NVIDIA
Quadro NVS 315
Aggregate performance score
We've compared VII and Quadro NVS 315 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗VII outperforms Quadro NVS 315 by ~14% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+14%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: Radeon VII (~14%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider VII
- Higher catalog performance index
- More graphics memory
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 2.1 · AMD FidelityFX Super Resolution (FSR)
Reasons to consider Quadro NVS 315
- Lower stated power consumption
- Lower recorded market price
- Recorded feature support: Not supported
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMD
NVIDIAPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
5230
59100
100100
8843
Graphics card ranking
Positions 76–81of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon VII
121 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Quadro NVS 315
Price $65.00Based on catalog performance per unit of current market price, not measured FPS.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
52Better
30
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
44Better
28
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
41Better
26
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
59
100Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
58Better
51
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Power consumptionBetter
Process nodeBetter
Recommended PSU
Length
Die size
Memory cache
Transistor count
Max monitors
Max resolution
USB Type-C
DisplayPort
HDMI
Device class
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Memory type
Power connector—
Release date
Architecture
Thickness
Compute API—
Launch price—
Shader units / cores
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAMBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory busBetter
Memory bandwidthBetter
Interface
Upscaling
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares VII and Quadro NVS 315 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
VIIQuadro NVS 315
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
213 FPS
154 FPS
1080p Ultra
150 FPS
108 FPS
1440p Ultra
117 FPS
58 FPS
4K Ultra
58 FPS
21 FPS
Counter-Strike 2VII213 FPSQuadro NVS 315154 FPSVII150 FPSQuadro NVS 315108 FPSVII117 FPSQuadro NVS 31558 FPSVII58 FPSQuadro NVS 31521 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077VII138 FPSQuadro NVS 31599 FPSVII119 FPSQuadro NVS 31585 FPSVII85 FPSQuadro NVS 31542 FPSVII39 FPSQuadro NVS 31514 FPS
Forza Horizon 5VII174 FPSQuadro NVS 315125 FPSVII112 FPSQuadro NVS 31581 FPSVII105 FPSQuadro NVS 31552 FPSVII85 FPSQuadro NVS 31531 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyVII112 FPSQuadro NVS 31581 FPSVII94 FPSQuadro NVS 31568 FPSVII76 FPSQuadro NVS 31538 FPSVII40 FPSQuadro NVS 31514 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100523054%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100593065%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100623458%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100884369%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1005910052%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100683662%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100663561%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100623458%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100723764%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100633460%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12.112.0
Vulkan1.31.2
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingAMD FidelityFX Super Resolution (FSR)Not supported
Compute APIOpenCL 2.1—
Architecture and release
ArchitectureGCN 5.1Not publicly specified
Process node7 nmBetter40 nm
Release date20192013
Device classDesktopProf
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count13230 millionNot publicly specified
Die size331 mm²Not publicly specified
Shader units / cores3840Not publicly specified
Base clock1400 MHzBetter523 MHz
Boost clock1800 MHzBetter523 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 3x16PCIe 2x16
Length280 mmVaries by board
ThicknessDual-slotVaries by board
Recommended PSU600 WVaries by board
Power connector8+8 pin—
Display outputs and limits
HDMIHDMI 2.0bBoard dependent
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4aBoard dependent
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitors4Varies by board
Max resolution7680 × 4320Varies by board
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM16 GB HBM2Better1 GB DDR3
Memory typeHBM2DDR3
Memory bus4096 bitBetter64 bit
TFLOPS13.44Better0.026
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 67
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (5)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (3)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: VII or Quadro NVS 315?+
VII has the higher overall gaming score, while VII offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
Quadro NVS 315 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
Quadro NVS 315 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
VII offers more overall performance, while VII offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
Quadro NVS 315 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
VII is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
VII leads in combined 1440p performance. VII can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
VII is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Quadro NVS 315 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Quadro NVS 315 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to VII if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.