GeForce RTX 5090
$4,427New · 7/16/2026
- Score
- 100.00
- Performance
- 100.00
- Value
- 37.6
Estimated Data confidence: 82%
Best Graphics cards: RTX 50 Series in 2026
Compare 8 qualifying models by performance, recorded market price, efficiency and data confidence. This ranking covers RTX 50 Series.
318Models analyzed8Qualifying modelsSep 14, 2026Data updated
Top picks
Best overall: GeForce RTX 5090 100.0 / 100
GeForce RTX 5060
$412New · 9/6/2026
- Score
- 55.23
- Performance
- 55.23
- Value
- 91.5
Estimated Data confidence: 75%
GeForce RTX 5080
$1,614New · 7/16/2026
- Score
- 76.42
- Performance
- 76.42
- Value
- 54.4
Estimated Data confidence: 82%
Prices in USD: used-market prices for older models or where retail quotes are unreliable; otherwise new hardware. Each price shows its condition and recorded date. Quotes older than 90 days are excluded. These are catalog estimates, not live offers.
Filters
Filters
8 · Qualifying models
Full ranking
| # | Data confidence | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GeForce RTX 5090Estimated | $4,427New · 7/16/2026 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 37.6 | 58.0 | 32 GB | 575 W | 82% |
| 2 | GeForce RTX 5080Estimated | $1,614New · 7/16/2026 | 76.42 | 76.42 | 54.4 | 63.7 | 16 GB | 400 W | 82% |
| 3 | GeForce RTX 5070 TiEstimated | $1,177New · 7/16/2026 | 69.49 | 69.49 | 60.7 | 77.2 | 16 GB | 300 W | 82% |
| 4 | GeForce RTX 5070Estimated | $779New · 7/16/2026 | 61.66 | 61.66 | 70.3 | 82.2 | 12 GB | 250 W | 82% |
| 5 | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GBEstimated | $465New · 9/6/2026 | 56.06 | 56.06 | 86.8 | 100.0 | 16 GB | 180 W | 82% |
| 6 | GeForce RTX 5060Estimated | $412New · 9/6/2026 | 55.23 | 55.23 | 91.5 | 100.0 | 8 GB | 145 W | 75% |
| 7 | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GBEstimated | $410New · 9/6/2026 | 52.87 | 52.87 | 89.8 | 97.9 | 8 GB | 180 W | 82% |
| 8 | GeForce RTX 5050Estimated | $350New · 7/16/2026 | 45.28 | 45.28 | 89.9 | 100.0 | 8 GB | 130 W | 82% |
Model / Performance
Qualifying models: 8 / 8
How we rank
Scores use a centrally versioned formula. Buying Score weights: performance 40%, value 30%, efficiency 10%, capacity 10%, documented features 5%, data confidence 5%. Missing inputs contribute zero; weights are not redistributed. CPU capacity means physical cores. Estimated results are labelled.
- Value
- 100 × √((Performance / USD) / 0.16)
- Efficiency
- 100 × (Performance / W) / 0.30
- Features
- Data coverage 0–100
H2H ranking v1
What should I check before upgrading?
Check the actual workload, power supply, case clearance and platform compatibility before buying. More VRAM or cores alone does not guarantee higher performance. CPU upgrades may require a BIOS update and compatible memory.
What the data shows
- Median price
- $622
- Average performance
- 64.6
- Score gap: first vs third
- 30.5
Frequently asked questions
Are these current market prices?
Prices in USD: used-market prices for older models or where retail quotes are unreliable; otherwise new hardware. Each price shows its condition and recorded date. Quotes older than 90 days are excluded. These are catalog estimates, not live offers.
How is the score calculated?
Scores use a centrally versioned formula. Buying Score weights: performance 40%, value 30%, efficiency 10%, capacity 10%, documented features 5%, data confidence 5%. Missing inputs contribute zero; weights are not redistributed. CPU capacity means physical cores. Estimated results are labelled.
What should I check before upgrading?
Check the actual workload, power supply, case clearance and platform compatibility before buying. More VRAM or cores alone does not guarantee higher performance. CPU upgrades may require a BIOS update and compatible memory.