Radeon RX 5700VSGeForce 8300 GS
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERRadeon RX 5700+2%Better overall performance
AMD
RX 5700
VSWINNERRX 57002%H2H overall index
NVIDIA
8300 GS
性能4437
効率81100
Price / Performance100100
Data confidence7575
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMDNVIDIAPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
4437
81100
100100
684
COMMUNITY · VERIFIED DATA
Open streamer setups→Hardware used by streamers
Real public setups linked to each device.
AMDRX 57000No verified public setup yet
NVIDIA8300 GS0No verified public setup yet
比較結果
RX 5700 is the best overall choice
RX 5700 leads in combined gaming performance. RX 5700 offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
RX 5700 leads in the combined performance index
8300 GS costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 93–98of 723
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon RX 5700
0 件のいいねHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
GeForce 8300 GS
100/100 · Price $79The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
総合スコア
概要
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
44Better
37
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
38
100Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
36Better
31
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
81
100Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
62Better
61
完全比較
仕様
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Clock speed1465 - 1625 MHzBetter459 MHz
Base clock1465 MHzBetter459 MHz
Boost clock1625 MHzBetter459 MHz
VRAM8 GB GDDR6128 MB DDR2Better
Memory typeGDDR6BetterDDR2
VRAM capacity8 GB128 MBBetter
メモリクロック14 GHz800 MHzBetter
Memory bus256 bitBetter64 bit
Memory bandwidth448 GB/s6400 GB/sBetter
InterfacePCIe 4x16BetterPCIe 2x16
Power connector6+8 pin-
Power consumption180 W40 WBetter
TDP180 W40 WBetter
Process node7 nmBetter80 nm
Release date2019Better2007
Architecture——
Recommended PSU——
Length——
Thickness——
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
DirectX——
Vulkan——
OpenGL——
Upscaling——
Compute API——
TFLOPS7.949Better0.015
Launch price——
Transistor count——
Die size——
Shader units / cores——
Memory cache——
ゲームFPS
Loading test-rig results…
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100443717%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100492951%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100512858%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100684178%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1008110021%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100552286%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100542477%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100512858%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 1005719100%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100512762%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
基本情報
Architecture——
Process node7 nm優位80 nm
Release date2019優位2007
Launch price——
詳細仕様
Transistor count——
Die size——
Shader units / cores——
Base clock1465 MHz優位459 MHz
Boost clock1625 MHz優位459 MHz
フォームファクターと互換性
InterfacePCIe 4x16優位PCIe 2x16
Length——
Thickness——
Recommended PSU——
Power connector6+8 pin-
VRAM容量とタイプ
VRAM8 GB GDDR6128 MB DDR2優位
Memory typeGDDR6優位DDR2
Memory bus256 bit優位64 bit
Memory bandwidth448 GB/s6400 GB/s優位
Memory cache——
接続と出力
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
APIとSDKの互換性
DirectX——
Vulkan——
OpenGL——
Upscaling——
Compute API——
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6その他の比較
レビューと質問
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
比較に関するよくある質問
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: RX 5700 or 8300 GS?+
RX 5700 has the higher overall gaming score, while RX 5700 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
8300 GS is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
8300 GS is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
RX 5700 offers more overall performance, while 8300 GS offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
8300 GS is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
RX 5700 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
RX 5700 leads in combined 1440p performance. 8300 GS can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RX 5700 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
8300 GS is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
8300 GS is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to RX 5700 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.